Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;16(10):2056–2063. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.308099

Table 4.

Statistical comparisons of SFI scores for control and experimental groups

Groups 0–42 d PO 42 d PO


Significance P value Significance P value
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. Sham ns 0.9999 ns 0.9883
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. Negative Control (n = 18) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Unoperated (n = 3) vs. PEG (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Sham vs. HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Sham vs. Negative Control (n = 18) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Sham vs. PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Sham vs. PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Sham vs. PEG (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) vs. Negative Control (n = 18) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) vs. PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) ns 0.9037 ns > 0.9999
HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) vs. PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) ns 0.8658 ns 0.9795
HPEG + 1% MB (n = 13) vs. PEG (n = 10) *** 0.0004 ** 0.0039
Negative Control (n = 18) vs. PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Negative Control (n = 18) vs. PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) **** < 0.0001 **** < 0.0001
Negative Control (n = 18) vs. PEG (n = 10) * 0.0062 *** 0.0003
PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) vs. PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) ns > 0.9999 ns 0.9938
PEG + 1% MB (n = 10) vs. PEG (n = 10) * 0.0317 * 0.0131
PEG + 0.5% MB (n = 10) vs. PEG (n = 10) * 0.0403 ns 0.0953

ns: Not significant; *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01,***P < 0.001,****P < 0.0001, respectively according to two-way analysis of variance with multiple comparisons from SFI data from 0–42 days PO, or SFI data from 42 days PO only.