Table 3. Summary table with performance metrics reported as median (95% CI) and F 1 interquartile variance (IQV) after 200 bootstrap iterations.
The performance metrics are compared across pipelines using different fields from PubMed entries.
| Pipeline | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F 1 (%) | F 1 IQV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title | 65.3 (59.0,72.7) | 65.8 (55.0,72.8) | 65.0 (59.5,71.0) | 11.5 |
| Abstract | 77.0 (69.8,82.6) | 79.8 (73.4,86.1) | 78.2 (73.6,82.6) | 9.0 |
| Authors * | 76.4 (69.4,82.6) | 80.4 (72.8,86.1) | 78.2 (73.3,82.6) | 9.3 |
| Journal * | 76.4 (70.2,82.2) | 79.8 (72.8,85.4) | 78.0 (73.6,82.0) | 8.4 |
| Publication Type * | 78.0 (71.6,84.3) | 81.6 (74.7,87.4) | 79.6 (75.5,84.2) | 8.7 |
| Keywords * | 76.6 (70.2,83.0) | 80.4 (72.8,85.5) | 78.2 (73.8,82.2) | 8.4 |
| MeSH terms * | 79.2 (72.1,85.2) | 79.8 (72.8,86.1) | 79.5 (74.3,83.3) | 9.0 |
| Chemicals * | 76.0 (69.5,81.9) | 80.4 (73.4,86.1) | 77.8 (73.0,82.0) | 9.0 |
| Affiliations * | 76.6 (69.8,82.1) | 80.4 (72.8,86.7) | 78.3 (73.2,81.9) | 8.7 |
| All fields | 80.1 (73.0,86.1) | 81.6 (74.1,87.4) | 80.5 (75.7,84.9) | 9.2 |
| Optimal Fields ** | 80.1 (73.9,86.0) | 82.3 (74.1,88.6) | 80.6 (75.8,85.2) | 9.4 |
*Tokens from the title and abstract were also included when encoding this field.
**The optimal fields were the title, abstract, MeSH terms and publication type.