Author & year of publication |
Rehabilitation outcome target |
Intervention |
Number of patients |
Type of study |
Result |
Conclusion |
Bortone et al. (2020) [25] |
Upper extremity function in Cerebral Palsy |
weaRable hAptic devices (VERA), cross over with manual therapy |
8 |
Pilot cross over RCT |
Improvement in upper extremity function in both control and experimental group |
No statistically significant difference between both groups |
Ögün et al. (2019) [26] |
Post-stroke upper extremity function |
Leap Motion-based 3D immersion VR |
65 |
RCT |
Improvement in upper extremity function |
Statistically significant upper extremity motor improvement in the experimental group (p<0.05) assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale |
Choi et al. (2019) [27] |
Post-stroke upper extremity function |
Gesture recognition (GR) device mirror therapy |
36 |
RCT |
Improvement in upper extremity function |
Statistically significant motor improvement in the GR group as compared to conventional mirror therapy group (p<0.05) |
Oh et al. (2019) [28] |
Post-stroke upper extremity function and cognitive function |
VR + real instrument training |
31 |
RCT |
Improvement in upper extremity function |
Statistically significant motor improvement in the experimental group for wrist extension (p< 0.04) and elbow flexion (p<0.022) |
Feng et al. (2019) [29] |
Parkinson’s disease balance and gait |
VR training rehabilitation |
28 |
RCT |
Improved balance and gait |
Statistically significant motor improvement in the experimental group (p < 0.05) across many scales: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) |
Park et al. (2019) [30] |
Post-stroke upper extremity function |
VR based planar motion exercise apparatus |
26 |
Pilot RCT |
Improvement in upper extremity function |
Significant difference in motor function in both groups (p<0.05). Increased range of motion in the experimental group versus control for should abduction and internal rotation (non-statistically significant) |
Lee et al. (2018) [31] |
Post-stroke postural balance and upper extremity function |
Game-based VR canoe paddling |
30 |
RCT |
Improvement in both balance and upper extremity function |
Statistically significant motor improvement in upper extremity function and postural balance (p<0.05) |
Karasu et al. (2018) [32] |
Post-stroke static and dynamic balance |
Nintendo Wii + conventional therapy |
23 |
RCT |
Improved in many categories |
Motor improvement in both groups (non-statistically significant primary outcome), however group-time secondary outcome shows significant difference in the experimental group (p<0.001) for BBS and Functional Reach Test (FRT) |
Bergmann et al. (2018) [33] |
Post-stroke gait |
VR augmented robotic-assisted gait therapy (RAGT) |
20 |
Pilot RCT |
Improved gait and motivation |
Increased motivation in the experimental group, this group spent more time walking on the robot compared to the control group (<0.03). Statistically significant difference on the Functional Ambulation Classification (p<0.01) after intervention in both control and experimental group |
Gandolfi et al. (2017) [34] |
Parkinson’s disease balance and gait |
Virtual Telerehabilitation using Nintendo Wii |
76 |
RCT |
Reduced postural instability |
Statistically significant motor improvement in VR Telerehabilitation group compared to in-clinic rehabilitation group (p=0.04) on Berg Balance Scale |
Calabrò et al. (2017) [35] |
Post-stroke gait and balance |
RAGT + VR (2D animated avatar) interaction using EEG oscillations |
24 |
Pilot RCT |
Improvement in gait and balance |
RAGT + VR (experimental group) showed higher event-related spectral perturbations (ERSP) in specific fronto-central cortical affected brain areas as compared to the control group |
In et al. (2016) [16] |
Post-stroke postural balance and gait |
Virtual reality reflection therapy (VRRT) |
25 |
RCT |
Improvement in many categories |
Statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in VRRT group across various scales such as postural sway, Functional Reach Test, BBS, and TUG |
Ballester et al. (2016) [36] |
Post-stroke upper extremity function |
Reinforcement-Induced Movement Therapy (RIMT) |
18 |
RCT |
Motor improvement with RIMT |
Statistically significant motor improvement 12 weeks post-trial (p<0.05) |