Table 1.
| Differences in NAP SACC Change Scores among ECE Programs in Virginia that participated in the Original ECELC Model in 2016–2017 compared to those that participated in the Online Go NAP SACC Model in 2017–2018
| NAP SACC scores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAP SACC topic | n | Pre | Post | Change scorea | Difference in change score P valueb |
| Breastfeeding and infant feeding | |||||
| Original ECELC Model | 63 | 9.3 | 14.1 | 4.8*** | .1182 |
| Online Go NAP SACC | 31 | 7.7 | 14.7 | 7.1*** | |
| Child Nutrition | |||||
| Original ECELC Model | 74 | 24.4 | 31.9 | 7.4*** | .1934 |
| Online Go NAP SACC | 31 | 21.8 | 32.3 | 10.5*** | |
| Infant and Child Physical Activity | |||||
| Original ECELC Model | 74 | 8.7 | 13.7 | 5.0*** | .0519 |
| Online Go NAP SACC | 31 | 8.3 | 14.2 | 5.9*** | |
| Outdoor Play and Learning | |||||
| Original ECELC Model | 74 | 4.8 | 8.7 | 3.9*** | .4201 |
| Online Go NAP SACC | 31 | 5.1 | 10.3 | 5.2*** | |
| Screen Time | |||||
| Original ECELC Model | 74 | 4.9 | 7.3 | 2.4*** | .0910 |
| Online Go NAP SACC | 31 | 4.3 | 6.1 | 1.8*** | |
Analysis included ECE programs that served infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and responded to at least one item per each topic area of the NAP SACC at preassessment and at least one item in postassessment.
aChange Scores were calculated by subtracting from preassessment from postassessment. Statistically significant changes from preassessment to postassessment, after adjusting for NAP SACC preassessment score, are denoted with *p < .05, **p < .01, or ***p < .001.
b p-values shown were for model-estimated differences in change scores per intervention type (original vs. adaptation), after adjusting for NAP SACC preassessment scores.