Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Nov;43(6):834–849. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0754-1

Table 3.

Formative evaluation of participatory system dynamics (PSD) modeling: stakeholder participation and perspectives

  1. Representative stakeholder concerns or modeling goals

    Evening out the workload so that all providers are seeing an approximately equal number of patients each week Improving psychotherapy access

    Proper referrals to trauma focus therapy with the PTSD Specialty Program

    The flow to/from the women’s counseling center

    All mental health processes

  2. Stakeholder ‘dynamic hypotheses’ or scenario tests

    What if the intake duration was 60 min instead of 90 min?

    What if intake was in BHIP and PCT started EBP without an info group and second intake (streamlined scenario)?

  3. What stakeholders find useful about PSD

    If staff feel heard, that will improve morale

    Better scheduling and sensible workflow

    Getting everyone on the same page

    Implement change in a far more targeted way

    Show accurate numbers/stats to help give the overall staff understanding of process, uniformity and reflect workload adequately

    Having an outside consultant with the potential to engage without vested interest to manipulate

    Having a physical representation for fine tuning a process

    That is looking at systems and allowing needed dialogue

    Taking into consideration more real world complexity

BHIP Behavioral Health Integration Program, PCT PTSD Clinical Team