Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Adolesc. 2021 Mar 22;31(2):435–450. doi: 10.1111/jora.12615

Table 3.

Concurrent victimization regressed onto activation and functional connectivity for the perceived low > high relational value contrast, controlling for age and sex, in Study 1

Region x y z k t

Activation
Calcarine Gyrus 18 −76 19 95 4.42
Connectivity with ventral striatum seed region
L IFG −42 35 7 95 −5.15
R IFG 36 44 −8 399 −4.97
R Putamen 30 5 −2 60 −4.97
L mPFC* −9 35 −5 59 −5.23
R mPFC* 6 41 −5 59 −4.07
L Inferior Occipital Gyrus −27 −91 −2 44 4.95

Note. L and R refer to left and right hemispheres; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; mPFC= medial prefrontal cortex; k refers to the number of voxels in each significant cluster; t refers to peak activation level in each cluster, with negative values indicating negative correlation with victimization and positive scores indicating positive correlation with victimization; x, y, and z refer to the MNI coordinates. Corrected cluster size: 49 contiguous voxels (activation) and 37 contiguous voxels (connectivity). All results are p < .001, corrected.

*

denotes part of the same cluster.