Risk of Bias | |||
---|---|---|---|
Participants | Predictors | Outcome | Analysis |
Were appropriate data sources used, e.g., cohort, RCT, or nested case–control study data? Yes | Were predictors defined and assessed in a similar way for all participants? Yes | Was the outcome determined appropriately? Yes | Were there a reasonable number of participants with the outcome? Yes |
Were all inclusions and exclusions of participants appropriate? Yes | Were predictor assessments made without knowledge of outcome data? Yes | Was a prespecified or standard outcome definition used? Yes | Were continuous and categorical predictors handled appropriately? Yes |
Are all predictors available at the time the model is intended to be used? Yes | Were predictors excluded from the outcome definition? Yes | Were all enrolled participants included in the analysis? No | |
Was the outcome defined and determined in a similar way for all participants? Yes | Were participants with missing data handled appropriately? Yes | ||
Was the outcome determined without knowledge of predictor information? Yes | Was selection of predictors based on univariable analysis avoided? No | ||
Was the time interval between predictor assessment and outcome determination appropriate? Yes | Were complexities in the data (e.g., censoring, competing risks, sampling of control participants) accounted for appropriately? Yes | ||
Were relevant model performance measures evaluated appropriately? Yes | |||
Were model overfitting, underfitting, and optimism in model performance accounted for? Yes | |||
Do predictors and their assigned weights in the final model correspond to the results from the reported multivariable analysis? Yes |
ROB = risk of bias. + indicates low ROB/low concern regarding applicability; − indicates high ROB/high concern regarding applicability; and ? indicates unclear ROB/unclear concern regarding applicability.