Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;12(1):1947570. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1947570

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Authors, year Country Trauma type Single incident, multiple or mixed Interventions Number
of participants
Format Maximum duration weeks, sessions, (minutes) Delivered by Age range (mean) Met PTSD diagnostic threshold at pre-treatment (%) Male
(%)/
Female (%)
Dropout (%)a
Ahmad, Larsson, & Sundelin-Wahlsten, 2007 Sweden Various Mixed EMDR vs WL 33 Individual 8, 8 (45) Therapists (authors) 6–16(10) 100 41.2/58.8 9.1
Ahrens & Rexford, 2002 USA Violence Mixed CPT vs WL 38 Group 8, 8 (60) Experienced doctoral candidate and qualified psychologist 15–18(16.4) 100 100/0 0
Barron, Abdallah, & Heltne, 2016 Palestine Mass Conflict Mixed TRT vs WL 154 Group n.r., 5 (60) School counsellors 11–18 (13.5) 100 36.4/63.6 16.9
Catani et al., 2009 Sri Lanka Civil unrest, Tsunami Mixed KidNET vs MED-RELAX 31 Individual 2, 6 (60–90) Teachers trained as ‘master counsellors’ 8–14(11.9) n.r. 54.8/45.2 0
Cohen et al., 2004 USA Sexual abuse Mixed TFCBT vs CCT 229 Individual(with parent involvement) 12,12 (45) Experienced therapist (social workers and psychologists) 8–14(10.7) 89 21.2/78.8 11.4
Cohen et al., 2011 USA Intimate Partner Violence Mixed TFCBT vs CCT 124 Individual(with parent involvement) 8, 8 (45) Social workers 7–14 (9.6) 25 49.2/50.8 39.5
Dawson et al., 2018 Indonesia Civil conflict Mixed TFCBT vs PS 64 Individual(with care-giver involvement) 6, 6 (60) Lay counsellors 7–14 (10.4) 75 51.5/48.5 0
de Roos et al., 2011 Netherlands Firework Factory explosion Single incident TFCBT vs EMDR 52 Individual(with parent involvement) 8, 4 individual plus 4 parent (60) Licenced therapists 4–18(10.1) 17.3 55.8/44.2 25.9
de Roos et al., 2017 Netherlands Various Single incident CBWT vs EMDR vs WL 103 Individual Up to 6, 6 (45) Clinical psychologists 8–18 (13.1) 61.2 42.7/57.3 3.9
Deblinger et al., 2011 USA Child sexual abuse Mixed TFCBT (with TN) vs TFCBT (without TN) 210 Individual(with caregiver involvement) Either 8 or 16, 8 or 16, (90) Graduates with 3+ years of clinical experience 4–11 (7.7) n.r. 39/61 24.8
Diehle et al., 2015 Netherlands Various Mixed TFCBT vs EMDR 48 Individual(with parent involvement) 8, 8 (60) Experienced therapists 8–18 (13) 33 38/62 25
Ertl et al., 2011 Uganda Former child soldiers Multiple KidNET vs Academic catchup with SC 85 Individual 3, 8 (90–120) Lay counsellors 12–25 (18) 100 44.7/55.3 7.6
Foa, McLean, Capaldi, & Rosenfield, 2013 USA Child sexual abuse Mixed PE vs SC 61 Individual 14,14 (60 − 90) Masters-level counsellors 13 − 18 (15.3) 100 0/100 13.1
Ford et al., 2012 USA Various Mixed TARGET vs ETAU 59 Individual n.r., 12 (50) Experienced therapists with professional qualifications 13–17 (14.7) 62.8 0/100 27.1
Gilboa-Schechtman et al., 2010 Israel Various Single Incident PE-A vs TLDP 38 Individual PE-A: 15,15 (90)TLDP: n.r., 18 (50) ‘MA level clinicians’ 12–18 (14.1) 100 37/63 21.1
Goldbeck et al., 2016 Germany Various Mixed TFCBT vs WL 159 Individual(with parent involvement) 12, 12 (90) Therapist with advanced clinical training 7–17 (13.0) 75.5 28.3/71.7 1.9
Jaberghaderi et al., 2004 Iran Sexual abuse Mixed TFCBT vs EMDR 18 Individual(with parent involvement) 12, 12 (45) Clinical psychologist 12–13 (n.r.) n.r. 0/100 21.1
Jaberghaderi et al., 2019 Iran Domestic Violence Multiple TFCBT vs EMDR 40 Individual(with parent involvement) 12, 12 (60) Experienced therapists (including author) 8–12 (n.r.) 100 50.4/49.6 23.8
Jensen et al., 2014 Norway Various Mixed TFCBT vs TAU 156 Individual(with parent involvement) n.r., 15 (45) Experienced therapist from mix of professions (15.1) 66.7 20.5/79.5 25
Kemp et al., 2010 Australia Motor vehicle accidents Single incident EMDR vs WL 27 Individual 6, 4 (60) Doctoral-level psychologist with advance training 6–12(8.9) n.r. 55.6/44.4 11.1
King et al., 2000 Australia Child sexual abuse Multiple Child CBT vs Family CBT vs WL 36 Individual (child only)/Individual parent & child) 20, 20 (50) Registered psychologist 5–17 (11.5) 69.4 31/69 22.2
McMullen et al., 2013 DR Congo War Mixed TFCBT vs WL 50 Group n.r., 15 (45) Authors and experienced Congolese counsellors 13–17 (15.8) n.r. 100/0 4
Meiser-Stedman et al., 2017 UK Various Single incident CT-PTSD vs WL 29 Individual 10, 10 (90) Clinical psychologists (including authors) 8–17(13.3) 100 27.8/72.2 10.3
Murray et al., 2015 Zambia Various Mixed TFCBT vs TAU 257 Individual 16, 16 (90) Lay counsellors 5–18 (13.7) n.r. 50.2/49.8 9.7
Nixon et al., 2012 Australia Various Single incident TFCBT vs Cognitive Therapy (no exposure) 34 Individual(with parent involvement) 9, 9 (90) Trainee clinical psychologists 7–17 (10.8) 100 63.3/36.7 38.2
O’Callaghan et al., 2013 DR Congo War Mixed TFCBT vs WL 52 Group (plus x3 individual sessions & x3 caregiver sessions) 5, 15, (120) Social workers 12–17 (16.1) 60 0/100 11.5
O’Callaghan et al., 2015 DR Congo War Mixed TFCBT vs CFS 50 Group 3, 9 (90) Lay facilitators 8–17 (14.8) 92 58/42 0
Peltonen & Kangaslampi, 2019 Finland Various Mixed NET vs TAU 50 Individual 10, 10 (9) Experienced MH professionals 9–17 (13.2) n.r. 58/42 14
Pityaratstian et al., 2015 Thailand Tsunami Mixed TRT (adapted) vs WL 36 Group 0.4, 3 (120)b Certified child psychiatrists (incl. author) 10–15 (12.3) 100 27.8/72.2 0
Robjant et al., 2019 DR Congo Former Child Soldiers Multiple FORNET vs TAU 92 Individual(plus x1 group session per week) 6, 12 (120) Lay people 16–25 (18) 100 0/100 0
Rosner et al., 2019 Germany Various Mixed D-CPT vs WL/TA 88 Group 20, 30 (50) Masters-level or postdoctoral therapists 14–21 (18.1) 100 15/85 21.6
Ruf et al., 2010 Germany Refugees Multiple KidNET vs WL 26 Group 8, 8 (120) Clinical psychologists 7–16 (11.5) 100 54/46 3.9
Salloum & Overstreet, 2012 USA Various Mixed GTI-CN vs GTI-C 72 Group (plus x1 individual & x1 parent session) 10, 12 (60) Social workers, social work interns, psychology doctoral student 6–12 (9.6) n.r. 55.7/44.3 5.6
Santiago et al., 2014 USA Community Violence Mixed CBITS vs CBITS + Family 64 Group (plus 1–3 individual & 1–2 group sessions for parents) n.r., 12 (50) Social workers 10–14 (11.7) 100 41/59 0
Scheeringa et al., 2011 USA Various Mixed TFCBT vs WL 64 Individual(with parent involvement) 12, 12 (50) Social workers 3–6 (5.3) 24 66.2/33.8 29.7
Schottelkorb et al., 2012 USA Refugees Mixed TFCBT vs CCPT 31 Individual(with parent involvement) TFCBT: 12, 20 (30)C0+: 12, 24 (30) Masters-level student counsellors 6–13 (9.1) 58 54.8/45.2 16.1
Shein-Szydlo et al., 2016 Mexico Various Mixed TFCBT vs WL 100 Individual 12, 12 (60) Psychologists (Authors) 12–19 (14.9) 100 44/56 1
Smith et al., 2007 UK Various Single incident TFCBT vs WL 24 Individual(with parent involvement) 10, 12 (n.r.) Clinical psychologists 8–18 (13.8) 100 50/50 0
Stein et al., 2003 USA Violence Mixed CBITS vs WL 126 Group 10, 10 (60) School clinicians n.r. (11) n.r. 43.7/56.3 9.5
Tol et al., 2008 Indonesia Civil conflict Mixed CBT-CBI vs WL 403 Group 5, 15 (n.r.) Local lay people (9.9) n.r. 51.4/48.6 2.5

EMDR, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing; WL, waiting list; CPT , cognitive processing therapy; TRT, Teaching Recovery Techniques; KidNET, narrative exposure therapy for children; MED-RELAX, meditation and relaxation intervention; TFCBT, trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy; CCT, child-centred therapy; PS, problem solving intervention; CBWT, cognitive behavioural writing therapy; TN, trauma narrative; SC, supportive counselling; PE, prolonged exposure; TARGET, Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy; ETAU,enhanced treatment as usual (relationship supportive therapy); PE-A, prolonged exposure for adolescents; TLDP, time-limited psychodynamic therapy; TAU, treatment as usual; CBT,cognitive behavioural therapy; CT-PTSD, cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder; CFS,child friendly spaces; NET, narrative exposure therapy; FORNET, narrative exposure therapy adapted for offenders; WL/TA, waiting list with treatment advice; GTI-CN, grief and trauma intervention with coping skills and trauma narrative processing; GTI-C, grief and trauma intervention – coping skills only; CCPT, child centred play therapy; cbits=cognitive behavioural intervention for trauma in schools; CBT-CBI, cognitive behavioural therapy classroom-based Intervention; n.r. = not reported.

aDropout from all arms including waiting list. bIntervention delivered over three consecutive days followed by homework over the following month.