Table 3.
Scenario | 2022 |
2025 |
2030 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario 1: no COVID-19 impact, median cumulative no. of deaths (range across models) | 122 675 (110 406-125 042) | 250 633 (228 585-257 537) | 473 903 (444 352-493 595) | |||
Excess deaths (range across models), No. | Increase (range across models), % | Excess deaths (range across models), No. | Increase (range across models), % | Excess deaths (range across models), No. | Increase (range across models), % | |
Scenario 2a: delayed screening | 166 | 0.15 | 294 | 0.13 | 364 | 0.08 |
(131-209) | (0.11-0.17) | (265-413) | (0.10-0.16) | (269-404) | (0.05-0.09) | |
Scenario 2b: skipped screening | 545 | 0.49 | 1158 | 0.45 | 1631 | 0.33 |
(156-810) | (0.13-0.65) | (1033-1382) | (0.45-0.55) | (1357-2191) | (0.31-0.46) | |
Scenario 2c: hybrid delayed and skipped screening | 355 | 0.32 | 711 | 0.29 | 950 | 0.19 |
(144-509) | (0.12-0.41) | (664-898) | (0.28-0.36) | (860-1297) | (0.19-0.27) | |
Scenario 3: delayed diagnosis | 411 | 0.33 | 728 | 0.28 | 1314 | 0.27 |
(134-830) | (0.11-0.75) | (233-1223) | (0.09-0.54) | (266-1325) | (0.06-0.30) | |
Scenario 4: reduced chemotherapy treatment | 39 | 0.03 | 100 | 0.04 | 151 | 0.03 |
(27–88) | (0.02-0.08) | (84–122) | (0.03-0.05) | (146–207) | (0.03-0.04) | |
Scenario 5a: disruptions in screening and diagnosis: best case scenario | 623 | 0.50 | 997 | 0.39 | 1589 | 0.32 |
(267-1100) | (0.22-1.00) | (656-1674) | (0.26-0.73) | (675-1868) | (0.14-0.42) | |
Scenario 5b: disruptions in screening and diagnosis: worst case scenario | 1236 | 0.99 | 1904 | 0.74 | 2861 | 0.60 |
(302-1479) | (0.25-1.34) | (1632-2412) | (0.65-1.06) | (2476-2966) | (0.52-0.64) | |
Scenario 5c: disruptions in screening and diagnosis | 930 | 0.74 | 1450 | 0.56 | 2277 | 0.46 |
(285-1289) | (0.23-1.17) | (1144-2043) | (0.46-0.89) | (1576-2365) | (0.33-0.53) | |
Scenario 6a: disruptions in screening and diagnosis and treatment: best case scenario | 701 | 0.56 | 1167 | 0.45 | 1896 | 0.38 |
(291-1170) | (0.24-1.06) | (744-1778) | (0.30-0.78) | (826-1990) | (0.17-0.45) | |
Scenario 6b: disruptions in screening and diagnosis and treatment: worst case scenario | 1311 | 1.05 | 2067 | 0.80 | 2983 | 0.66 |
(315-1549) | (0.26-1.40) | (1700-2516) | (0.68-1.10) | (2599-3255) | (0.55-0.67) | |
Scenario 6c: disruptions in screening and diagnosis and treatment | 1006 | 0.80 | 1617 | 0.63 | 2487 | 0.52 |
(303-1360) | (0.25-1.23) | (1222-2147) | (0.49-0.94) | (1713-2575) | (0.36-0.56) |
The excess mortality is expressed in terms of both the number of breast cancer deaths and percent increase compared with cumulative number of breast cancer deaths without pandemic effect. The excess number of deaths in a row for a particular scenario is calculated by subtracting the cumulative number of deaths without COVID-19 pandemic (scenario 1) as given in the first row from that obtained under that scenario. Similarly, the percent increase is calculated by dividing this difference by the cumulative number of deaths without COVID-19 pandemic.