Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;12(5):e00357. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000357

Table 2.

Geographical variation in PBC pathology-based prevalence, by sex

IRR (95% CI) Test for difference
Males Females
State
 QLD 1.00 [reference] 1.00 [reference]
 NSW/ACT 0.91 (0.59, 1.42) 1.11 (0.95, 1.31) P = 0.44
 SA 1.26 (0.81, 1.96) 1.87 (1.60, 2.19) P = 0.16
 VIC 1.65 (0.99, 2.76) 1.76 (1.44, 2.15) P = 0.68
 TAS 1.91 (0.84, 4.34) 2.79 (2.12, 3.66) P = 0.45
Trend: P = 0.010 P < 0.001 P = 0.82
Region type
 Regional 1.00 [reference] 1.00 [reference]
 Metro 1.48 (1.03, 2.13) 1.28 (1.13, 1.45) P = 0.45
 Capital 1.48 (1.04, 2.09) 1.01 (0.89, 1.14) P = 0.043
Trend: P = 0.019 P = 0.44 P = 0.054
Latitude (continuous) 1.01 (0.98, 1.05) P = 0.46 1.05 (1.04, 1.06) P < 0.001 P = 0.13
Latitude (quintiles)
 −18.02, −27.59 1.00 [reference] 1.00 [reference]
 <-27.59, −33.85 0.68 (0.40, 1.14) 1.15 (0.96, 1.37) P = 0.070
 <-33.85, −35.33 1.00 (0.64, 1.55) 1.09 (0.92, 1.31) P = 0.93
 <-35.33, −37.75 1.01 (0.57, 1.79) 1.29 (1.06, 1.58) P = 0.22
 <-37.75, −42.72 0.99 (0.63, 1.55) 1.86 (1.58, 2.19) P = 0.031
Trend: P = 0.64 P < 0.001 P = 0.057

Analyses by Poisson regression, estimating an IRR (95% CI). All models except region type adjusted for region type.

Bold indicates statistical significance.