Table 4.
Regions | Sampling Time | Antibiotic Types and Concentrations | Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAs | QNs | MLs | TCs | LMs | |||
Songhua River | 2017.10 | ND-26.9 (14.8) |
ND-7.1 (2.6) |
ND-6.9 (3.8) |
— | — | [35] |
Liao River | 2015.7–11 | ND-56.4 (25.4) |
10.2–441.7 (137.8) |
17.4–496.5 (151.4) |
ND-849.7 (187.1) |
— | [36] |
Hai River | 2010.09 | 27.4–317 (187) |
26.5–196 (121) |
6.6–33.4 (17.1) |
— | — | [37] |
Yellow River | 2014.09 | — | 54.79–173.66 (82.65) |
4.7–27.64 (12.71) |
32.71–131.59 (49.79) |
— | [38] |
Yangtze River | 2013.autum | 40.3–310.7 | — | 11.9–125.7 | — | — | [39] |
Taihu Lake | 2015.12 | 8.7–34.7 (16.6) |
17.4–57.7 (29.7) |
25.6–89.1 (60.5) |
69.8–189.6 (112) |
— | [11] |
Huaihe River | 2018.12 | 6.2–19 | — | — | 5.7–170 | — | [14] |
This study | 2020.10 | ND-27.43 (1.95) |
4.16–99.51 (25.39) |
ND-15.90 (4.83) |
6.94–225 (36.67) |
ND-6.42 (1.76) |
ND, not detected; ( ) means average value. The same below.