Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 7;31(10):4528–4541. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05643-z

Table 2.

Standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of excess weight loss following metabolic surgery

Time point Intervention Comparator No. of direct comparison studies Pairwise meta-analysis (SMD)* Between-study variance (MA) Network meta-analysis (SMD)* Between-study variance (NMA)
1 year RYGB SG 9

0.06

(− 0.09, 0.22)

0.200

1.67

(− 0.89, 4.24)

0.202
RYGB OAGB 2

1.76

(− 0.77, 0.77)

0.210

4.35

(1.30, 7.40)

0.005
SG OAGB 2

1.21

(− 0.64, 3.13)

0.233

2.68

(0.16, 5.21)

0.037
2 years RYGB SG 5

0.05

(− 0.024, 0.14)

0.347

1.37

(− 2.31, 5.06)

0.465
RYGB OAGB 3

1.00

(− 0.63, 2.63)

0.222

3.84

(0.47, 7.22)

0.026
SG OAGB 2

1.26

(− 1.01, 3.54)

0.309

2.47

(− 0.85, 5.79)

0.144
3–5 years RYGB SG 7

 − 0.28

(− 0.49, − 0.07)

0.024

 − 7.19

(− 10.88, − 3.51)

 < 0.001
RYGB OAGB 1 N/A -

0.85

(− 3.24, 4.93)

0.685
SG OAGB 2

1.78

(− 1.22, 4.78)

0.301

8.04

(3.98, 12.10)

 < 0.001

*Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. A standardised mean difference (SMD) greater than 0.00 favours the comparator (more EWL with comparator than with intervention); a SMD of less than 0.00 favours intervention (less EWL with comparator than with intervention).

MA standard pairwise meta-analysis, NMA network meta-analysis.