Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2021 Jul 15;53(8):1250–1259. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00895-y

Haplotype-resolved genome assembly provides insights into evolutionary history of the tea plant Camellia sinensis

Xingtan Zhang 1,2,✉,#, Shuai Chen 1,3,4,#, Longqing Shi 1,3,5,#, Daping Gong 6,#, Shengcheng Zhang 4, Qian Zhao 1,5, Dongliang Zhan 7, Liette Vasseur 1,5,8, Yibin Wang 4, Jiaxin Yu 4, Zhenyang Liao 4, Xindan Xu 4, Rui Qi 4, Wenling Wang 4, Yunran Ma 4, Pengjie Wang 9, Naixing Ye 9, Dongna Ma 1, Yan Shi 1, Haifeng Wang 1, Xiaokai Ma 4, Xiangrui Kong 10, Jing Lin 4, Liufeng Wei 1, Yaying Ma 4, Ruoyu Li 4, Guiping Hu 1,11, Haifang He 1, Lin Zhang 12, Ray Ming 13, Gang Wang 14, Haibao Tang 4,, Minsheng You 1,5,
PMCID: PMC8346365  PMID: 34267370

Abstract

Tea is an important global beverage crop and is largely clonally propagated. Despite previous studies on the species, its genetic and evolutionary history deserves further research. Here, we present a haplotype-resolved assembly of an Oolong tea cultivar, Tieguanyin. Analysis of allele-specific expression suggests a potential mechanism in response to mutation load during long-term clonal propagation. Population genomic analysis using 190 Camellia accessions uncovered independent evolutionary histories and parallel domestication in two widely cultivated varieties, var. sinensis and var. assamica. It also revealed extensive intra- and interspecific introgressions contributing to genetic diversity in modern cultivars. Strong signatures of selection were associated with biosynthetic and metabolic pathways that contribute to flavor characteristics as well as genes likely involved in the Green Revolution in the tea industry. Our results offer genetic and molecular insights into the evolutionary history of Camellia sinensis and provide genomic resources to further facilitate gene editing to enhance desirable traits in tea crops.

Subject terms: Population genetics, Genomics, Plant genetics


Haplotype-resolved genome assembly of an Oolong tea cultivar Tieguanyin and population genomic analyses of 190 Camellia accessions provide insights into the evolutionary history of the tea plant Camellia sinensis.

Main

Many agronomically important crops are clonally propagated, including potato, cassava and tea. Such clonal propagation can be effective to maintain valuable genotypes that may segregate or be lost through sexual recombination1. However, this method has some disadvantages, including greater vulnerability to crop loss through shared disease susceptibility. Clonal crops can be prone to accumulating deleterious mutations, leading to high mutation load in plants that reproduce asexually due to ‘Muller’s ratchet’2. High levels of deleterious mutations in individuals can ultimately reduce relative fitness, associated with reduction of agronomic performance1. Diplontic selection can purge deleterious mutations and involves selecting specific cells bearing favorable alleles from a mixture of other cell lineages1,3. However, evolutionary consequences of mutation load in clonally propagated crops remain unclear.

Tea, produced from C. sinensis, is a widely consumed beverage that contains multiple polyphenolic compounds considered beneficial to human health4. Although the origin of tea drinking is unclear5, archeological evidence from the Mausoleum of Han Yangling indicates that tea drinking was popular by the 2nd century BCE during the Western Han dynasty6. With more than two billion cups consumed every day, tea is an extremely important crop economically and globally, yielding an annual global harvest of ~5 million tons, worth about US $5.7 billion (ref. 7). Tea is classified into two varieties, C. sinensis var. sinensis (CSS) and var. assamica (CSA) with a number of distinct features, such as leaf size8. Both varieties are flavorful, carry health-promoting bioactive compounds and have been domesticated for commercial tea production.

Recent studies have provided reference genomes for the two varieties911; however, the mosaic assemblies likely missed allelic variations underlying important selected traits. One of the studies of the tea genome generated a phased assembly based on construction of a genetic map. This strategy required a large effort to perform resequencing and variant calling of 135 sperm cells12, hindering application to other crops. Population structure and genetic diversity in tea plants have been extensively discussed recently911, which substantially contributed to the study of tea genomics. Nevertheless, the complex evolutionary history and uncertain phylogeny, especially the reticulate evolutionary pattern with wild close relatives, remain to be examined.

Tea plants exhibit allogamy and self-incompatibility13. This leads to a high level of heterozygosity in the genome, providing a model to investigate allelic variations that may play important roles during evolution. Hybridization among variable tea cultivars is known to produce offspring with desirable traits superior to both parents, indicating the importance of heterosis in tea breeding14. Abundant germplasm resources and the well-documented pedigree of cultivars make this species an attractive model system for studying the mechanism underlying heterosis. Here we show a chromosome-scale genome for the Chinese Oolong tea variety Tieguanyin (TGY; Chinese for ‘Iron Goddess of Mercy’), with two haplotypes fully represented. We also resequenced several leading tea accessions and close relatives to explore genetic diversity among geographically distinct tea populations. Our results provide insight into the mechanism of heterosis and the evolutionary history of the tea plant and uncover important signatures of selection.

Results

Genome assembly and annotation

The genome size of TGY was estimated to be ~3.15 Gb with a heterozygosity of 2.31%. Our initial contig-level assembly using 359 Gb (114×) of PacBio long reads was 5.41 Gb (Table 1), indicating high heterozygosity levels across the genome. Heterozygous sequences were identified using a new program (Khaper15) based on k-mer counting (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Comparison between our algorithm and existing programs revealed that Khaper is highly efficient and fast and handles heterozygous diploid species with large genome sizes (Supplementary Table 1). In total, 2.35 Gb of sequences were filtered from the initial contig assembly, resulting in a 3.06-Gb monoploid assembly with a contig N50 of 1.94 Mb and 93.7% benchmarking universal single-copy ortholog (BUSCO) completeness for the monoploid genome (Table 1). The resulting contigs were corrected using chromatin contact patterns in 3D-DNA16 and linked into 15 pseudo-chromosomes that anchored 3.03 Gb (98.96%) of the monoploid genome (Extended Data Fig. 1a and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). This monoploid genome represented a mosaic assembly of the two haplotypes, which selected the longest allelic contigs from the Canu17 initial assembly. Assessment of genome assembly using a series of approaches validated a high-quality reference assembly of the TGY genome (Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Tables 4 and 5 and Extended Data Figs. 13).

Table 1.

Summary of genome assembly and annotation of C. sinensis TGY

Sequencing C. sinensis cultivar TGY
PacBio Sequel II sequencing
 Raw data (Gb) 359
 Sequencing depth (×) 114
 Average reads length (bp) 1,608
 Reads N50 (bp) 24,830
Hi-C sequencing
 Clean data (Gb) 313
 Sequencing depth (×) 99.4
Monoploid genome assembly and annotation
 Estimated genome size (Gb) per 1 C 3.15
 Assembly size (Gb) 3.06
 Percent of estimated genome size (%) 97.1
 Contig N50 (Mb) 1.94
 BUSCO completeness of assembly (%) 93.7
 Total number of genes 42,825
 BUSCO completeness of annotation (%) 92.1
Haplotype-resolved chromosomal-level assembly and annotation
Haplotype A Haplotype B
 Length of chromosomes (Gb) 3.06 2.92
 BUSCO completeness of assembly (%) 84.8 83.2
 BUSCO completeness of annotation (%) 85.0 82.4
 Number of genes with annotated allelesa 32,596 24,723
 Number of genes with two allelesa 14,691
 Number of genes with one allelea 27,937
 Total number of anchored genes 42,628
 Unanchored genes or alleles 197

aOnly one allele was retained if the two allelic genes had the exact same coding sequences.

Extended Data Fig. 1. Genome feature and assessment of assemblies along the sequenced Oolong tea chromosomes (‘TGY’).

Extended Data Fig. 1

a, The circles (from outermost to innermost) represent monoploid genome in Mb, gene density, TE density, SNP density, indel density and GC content. b, Genome-wide analysis of chromatin interactions at 1 Mb resolution in the TGY genome. c, Assessment of five tea genome assemblies using LTR Assembly Index (LAI), which are DASZ, LJ43, SCZ, TGY and YK10. The x-axis lists names of these cultivars and y-axis represents LAI values. In each box plot, the bold line in centre indicates median value and bounds of box are the first (25%) and third (75%) quantiles. The minima and maxima values are present in the lower and upper whiskers, respectively. P values were calculated using the two-sided Kruskal-Wallis test without multiple comparison. d, Syntenic analysis of TGY monoploid genome assembly and TGY haplotype-resolved genome assembly.

Extended Data Fig. 3. Synteny analysis between TGY haplotype-resolved genome assembly with CSA and CSS assemblies.

Extended Data Fig. 3

The top 20 longest scaffolds from CSA genome and CSS genome were extracted for the snyteny analysis and only five of them were randomly selected for visualization a-j.

We predicted 42,825 protein-coding genes, collectively showing 92.1% BUSCO completeness (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 6). We also identified 2.39 Gb of repetitive sequences, accounting for 78.2% of the monoploid genome (Supplementary Table 7). A total of 20,969 intact long terminal repeats (LTRs) were identified in the TGY genome (Supplementary Table 8). A very recent LTR retrotransposon burst event was detected in the genome, dating back to 0.3–0.5 million years ago (Ma), based on the divergence of the terminal sequences of the repeats (Extended Data Fig. 4).

Fig. ExtendedData 4.

Fig. ExtendedData 4

Estimation of the LTR burst time based on intact LTRs identified by LTR_retriever.

Haplotypic variations and allelic imbalance

The high level of heterozygosity in the TGY genome allowed us to phase two haplotypes using ALLHiC18. Collapsed contigs were identified and duplicated based on read depth (Supplementary Note 2), recovering 564 Mb of homozygous sequences. The augmented set of sequences was subjected to haplotype phasing along with Canu phased contigs, resulting in a fully haplotype-solved assembly with 30 pseudo-chromosomes and 5.98 Gb of sequences anchored (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 9). Syntenic analysis revealed highly consistent gene order in both haplotypes (Extended Data Fig. 1d). To investigate sequence divergence and evolutionary relationships, we stringently aligned genome sequences with no gaps or indels allowed within an alignment block, finding 98.3% sequence identity between the two haplotypes (Fig. 1a). We also detected 3.7 million SNPs, 118,700 insertions and 118,335 deletions (Supplementary Table 10). These variations spanned 101.7 Mb, representing 3.3% of the assembled monoploid genome. The two haplotypes contained similar levels of repetitive sequences (74.3% in haplotype A and 74.2% in haplotype B; Supplementary Table 11). Estimation of switch errors19 relying on phased SNPs (Methods) showed an error rate of 5.9% (8,473 of 144,868), likely resulting either from the contig assembly or ALLHiC phasing. We observed that the haplotype-resolved assembly contained substantially fewer switch errors than the monoploid assembly (23.6%, 94,273 of 399,821), indicating that our phasing approach is vastly superior to existing approaches that only create a chimeric monoploid genome.

Fig. 1. Genetic variations between haplotypes and allelic imbalance in C. sinensis.

Fig. 1

a, Whole-genome comparison of two haplotypes using 10-Mb non-overlapping windows with no gap extension allowed within alignment blocks. The distribution of identities is shown in the lower panel, with the x axis representing identities and the y axis indicating the number of windows supporting the corresponding identity. b, Pairwise comparison of coding sequences for alleles. c, Pairwise comparison of the Ka/Ks distribution for allelic genes. Blue dots indicate genes with Ka/Ks > 1, and black dots indicate genes with Ka/Ks < 1. P values were calculated using a two-sided Fisher’s exact test. d, Numerical distribution of nonsynonymous substitutions between alleles. e, Identification of ASEGs in leaves. Coordinates are logarithmically scaled (log10). Blue dots indicate ASEGs, and gray dots represent genes that are not ASEGs. FPKM, fragments per kb exon per million fragments mapped. HA, haplotype A; HB, haplotype B. f, An example of an ASEG (CsSRC2) with a consistent expression pattern across tissues. Left, allelic differential expression of this gene in six tissues (stem, bud, root, flower, young leaves and mature leaves). Right, allelic variations between haplotype A and haplotype B, including one nonsynonymous mutation, two 3-bp insertions and one 78-bp insertion, which are supported by Iso-seq reads. The deduced amino acids resulting from these allelic variations are shown in the alignments and are indicated by protein A for haplotype A and protein B for haplotype B. g, An example of an ASEG (CsGGPS) with an inconsistent expression pattern. Left, differential allele expression of this gene in the six tissues above. Right, three nonsynonymous allelic variations supported by a number of Iso-seq reads.

Using these phased haplotypes, we separated 34.5% (14,691 of 42,628) of the annotated genes with two defined alleles (Table 1). Most allelic genes maintained high levels of coding sequence similarity (mean = 93%; Fig. 1b), and a vast majority of allelic genes underwent purifying selection, with an average Ka/Ks ratio of 0.07 (Fig. 1c). We further identified large-effect allelic variations that may influence gene function, including one pair with start codon loss, one pair with stop codon loss, 297 pairs with premature stop codons and 719 pairs with frame shifts. In total, 86.9% of allelic gene pairs contained at least one nonsynonymous substitution (Fig. 1d). These differences indicate that our haplotype-phased TGY assembly uncovers structural and functional allelic differences.

We next investigated allelic imbalance, that is, allele-specific expression (ASE), without resequencing the parental genomes. We found that 30.1% of genes (4,423 of 14,691) showed significant ASE in tea leaves (P < 0.05 and false discovery rate <0.05; Fig. 1e), indicating consistent and inconsistent allelic expression patterns. A comparison of 14,691 allele-defined genes resulted in 1,528 genes with expression biased toward one allele (that is, consistent ASE genes (ASEGs)) across the six tissues (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 12). These genes showed functional enrichment in multiple biological processes, including ribosome, endocytosis, basal transcription factor and spliceosome Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting that a potential mechanism to overcome deleterious mutations occurred in important genes related to basic biological functions. For instance, the CsSRC2 gene showed a consistent expression pattern across the six tested tissues. The ortholog in Arabidopsis thaliana encodes an activator of a calcium-dependent pathway that mediates reactive oxygen species production in response to cold stress20. We observed two 3-bp insertions and one 78-bp deletion in the second exon of haplotype B, introducing two additional amino acids (lysine and asparagine) while removing 26 amino acids from the deduced protein sequences (Fig. 1f). A nonsynonymous mutation was also detected in haplotype A, from G to C in haplotype B, modifying the amino acid from glutamine to histidine. These allelic variations were further supported by several Iso-seq reads.

Extended Data Fig. 5. Genes with consistent allele-specific expression (ASE) pattern across six tissues of bud, root, stem, flower, young and mature leaves.

Extended Data Fig. 5

The color bar represents log2(FC) values. FC indicates fold change of FPKM values between allele A and allele B. Red color suggests that expression in allele A is significantly higher than allele B and blue color means that expression in allele B is significantly higher than allele A.

In addition to consistent ASEGs, we found 386 inconsistent ASEGs that displayed switched high expression between alleles in different tissues (Extended Data Fig. 6). Several of these genes were associated with biosynthesis of volatile organic compounds, including flavone and flavonol, terpenoid backbone and falvonoid biosynthesis pathways (Supplementary Table 13). For example, the CsGGPS gene, encoding geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase, plays an important role in terpenoid backbone biosynthesis. A comparison of the two alleles showed 99.0% similarity; meanwhile, three amino acids were modified by three nonsynonymous mutations (Fig. 1g).

Extended Data Fig. 6. Genes with inconsistent allele-specific expression (ASE) pattern (direction shifting) across six tissues of bud, root, stem, flower, young and mature leaves.

Extended Data Fig. 6

The color bar represents log2(FC) values. FC indicates fold change of FPKM values between allele A and allele B. Red color suggests that expression in allele A is significantly higher than allele B, and blue color means that expression in allele B is significantly higher than allele A.

Patterns of genetic variation and population structure

We resequenced 129 Camellia accessions collected from 15 provinces across four major tea-growing regions: southwest of China, south of the Yangtze River, south of China and north of the Yangtze River (Fig. 2a). Along with 61 recently published resequenced tea samples, a total of 190 Camellia accessions were used in our analysis, containing 113 CSS, 48 CSA, one C. sinensis var. pubilimba, 15 Camellia taliensis, 12 closely related species and one Camellia oleifera as the outgroup (Supplementary Table 14). A total of 7.26 Tb of sequences with an average depth of 12.75× per accession were generated (Supplementary Table 14) and mapped onto the monoploid assembly, identifying 9,407,149 SNPs and 829,388 small indels (<10 bp) (Table 2).

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships and population structure of resequenced individual tea plants.

Fig. 2

Accessions are represented in the same color code throughout this figure (black, wild close relatives; orange, CT or C. taliensis; green, ACSA; pink, CCSA; dark blue, SSJ; purple, SFJ; red, ZJNFJ; cyan, HHA). a, Geographic distribution of resequenced individual tea plants. Population sizes are indicated by circle sizes. Base map © OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright). b, Maximum-likelihood tree with bootstrap values supported. Larger sizes of asterisks indicate higher values of bootstraps, mostly close to 100%. c, PCA of resequenced individual tea plants. PC, principal component. d, Ancestry results from Admixture under the k = 7 model supported by an examination of cross-validation errors (Extended Data Fig. 7). Two documented modern breeding events are indicated below the Admixture plot (HD, Huangdan; HMG, Huangmeigui; FDDB, Fudingdanbai; FY6, Fuyun 6).

Table 2.

Summary of genetic variation in tea populations

Category Core set C. taliensis ACSA CCSA SSJ SFJ ZJNFJ HHA
Sequence variants
SNPs 9,407,149 1,634,833 5,520,700 8,058,883 8,089,989 8,734,917 8,462,225 8,190,015
 Indels (<10 bp) 829,388 144,805 474,306 706,576 703,295 763,808 739,147 716,033
Variants with effects on genes
 SNPs that introduce stop codons 10,925 2,259 6,424 9,341 9,131 9,943 9,518 9,215
 SNPs that disrupt stop codons 1,033 221 633 909 907 965 949 924
 SNPs that induce alternative splicing 3,788 802 2,258 3,252 3,198 3,489 3,332 3,202
 Indels located in genic regions 207,235 39,635 119,726 177,496 179,152 192,450 186,738 180,503
 Frameshift indels 12,570 2,834 7,450 10,678 10,598 11,513 11,075 10,672
 Genes affected by large-effect variants 9,136 2,577 6,221 8,221 8,134 8,610 8,401 8,184
 Nonsynonymous variants 290,638 65,736 177,108 250,001 250,952 269,739 260,287 251,814
 Synonymous variants 194,509 44,744 120,383 168,743 170,440 181,399 175,497 169,732

Ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous SNPs in tea accessions were almost exactly the same, ranging from 1.47 to 1.49 (Supplementary Table 15). We analyzed large-effect SNPs that might impact gene function, including gain or loss of a stop codon or changes potentially affecting alternative splice sites (Table 2). In total, 9,136 protein-coding genes contained large-effect SNPs, and 207,235 indels were identified in genic regions, with 12,570 (6.07%) introducing frame shifts (Table 2). Functional analysis highlighted the binding function in gene ontology (GO) terms and plant–pathogen interaction in KEGG pathways (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4), linking large-effect mutations to evolutionary adaptation.

Phylogenetic analysis using 496,448 SNPs located in single-copy genes separated a subset of Camellia samples including 15 of C. taliensis and 161 of C. sinensis into three major types: C. taliensis, CSA and CSS, with C. taliensis being the most closely related to the outgroup (Fig. 2a–c). We observed two subgroups in the CSA type: ancestral CSA (ACSA) and cultivated CSA (CCSA). The ACSA subgroup represented samples collected from regions far from human territory (that is, wild forest) and clustered at the base of the cultivated tea accessions. The CSS group was partitioned into four subgroups, which are named after their dominant geographic locations: SSJ (Sichuan, Shaanxi and Jiangxi), SFJ (south Fujian), ZJNFJ (Zhejiang and north Fujian) and HHA (Hubei, Hunan and Anhui). Hierarchical structures were observed within some subgroups, such as SFJ, presumably due to frequent genetic exchanges among different subgroups according to our Admixture results (Fig. 2d). Results from network analysis using SplitsTree21 were in agreement with the maximum-likelihood tree; however, they showed a more complex network of phylogenetic relationships (Extended Data Fig. 7a). The first three axes of the principal-component analysis (PCA) further confirmed this population structure but showed more divergence between ACSA and CCSA subgroups (Fig. 2c).

Extended Data Fig. 7. Analysis of popualtion structure, envolutinoary and LD decay.

Extended Data Fig. 7

Evolutionary relationship of different tea populations based on network analysis using splitsTree. b, Population structure inferred by Admixture analysis of 176 tea accessions (K = 2 to 10). c, Cross-validation error shows that K = 7 is the optimal population clustering group.

Genetic clustering analysis revealed an optimal value of k = 7 subpopulations with the lowest cross-validation errors supported, consistent with the population structure derived by maximum-likelihood tree and PCA (Fig. 2 and Extended Data Fig. 7b,c). TreeMix analysis identified significant gene flow among these tea populations (Extended Data Fig. 8), indicating frequent intraspecific introgression, likely due to historical germplasm exchanges. Our population structure analysis reasonably showed consistency of genetic and geographic distribution of these tea germplasms. The Admixture22 plot detected the occurrence of a series of historical hybridization as well as documented modern breeding events. For instance, TGY and Huangdan are ancestors of several elite tea cultivars14, such as Huangmeigui. We observed that Huangmeigui (red and purple) was mixed, with a substantial contribution of genetic material originated from or similar to Huangdan (purple) and TGY (red and purple). In addition, the Admixture analysis is consistent with the documented breeding event that Fuyun 6 is a typical descendant of Fudingdabai11, showing a mixture of Fudingdabai (cyan) and one unknown CSA accession (pink) in Fuyun 6 (pink and cyan; Fig. 2d).

Extended Data Fig. 8. TreeMix analysis of allelic drift among different groups of tea populations.

Extended Data Fig. 8

Best-fitting genealogy for the tea populations calculated from the variance-covariance matrix of genome-wide allele frequencies. The lines with arrows indicates possible migration events. Color scale represent the weight of migration. and the scale bar indicates 10 times the average SE of the relatedness among populations based on the variance–covariance matrix of allele frequencies.

We observed a slightly higher nucleotide diversity (π) within the CCSA subgroup (6.44 × 10−4) than that within the four CCSS populations (average π = 6.22 × 10−4; Supplementary Table 15) and a similar level of linkage disequilibrium decay among the six subgroups compared to a rapid decay over physical distance in the wild C. taliensis group (Extended Data Fig. 9 and Supplementary Table 16). We further calculated population fixation statistics (FST) to investigate population divergence, which showed that the population divergence among four CSS subgroups (average = 3.67 × 10−2) was much smaller than that between the two CSA subgroups (8.77 × 10−2; Supplementary Table 17). We observed similar FST values when comparing the C. taliensis group to each of the six tea subgroups. On the other hand, the four CCS subgroups showed smaller population divergence from CCSA than that from ACSA.

Extended Data Fig. 9. Decay of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in each of the geographic groups.

Extended Data Fig. 9

CT represents C. taliensis; ACSA is ancestral C. sinensis var. assamica; CCSA means cultivated C. sinensis var. assamica; SSJ indicates samples from Sichuan, Shaanxi and Jiangxi; SFJ means South Fujian; ZJNFJ indicates Zhejiang and North Fujian; HHA include samples from Hubei, Hunan and Anhui.

Evolutionary history and genetic introgression

To investigate tea evolutionary history, we collected 12 close relatives from Camellia section Thea, the same section as C. sinensis. Along with eight selected C. sinensis accessions (including six CSS, one CSA and one var. pubilimba) and one outgroup, 21 individual plants from 14 Camellia species were resequenced at the whole-genome level (Supplementary Table 14). Based on a set of 9,407,149 high-quality SNPs, we observed that the eight C. sinensis accessions were clustered in a single group (Fig. 3a). Phylogenetic network analysis using SplitsTree19 supported the phylogenetic relationship in section Thea but illustrated a complex pattern of reticulate evolution (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3. Genome-wide patterns of genetic introgression to modern tea cultivars from their close relatives.

Fig. 3

a, Cytonuclear conflicts between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenetic trees among 14 resequenced Camellia section Thea species with C. oleifera included as the outgroup. b, SplitsTree network for Camellia accessions from section Thea. c, Detection of introgression events between C. sinensis and close relatives using the f3 test. Z scores were adjusted based on a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery-rate correction method, and significant introgression is indicated with purple if adjusted (adj) Z score < −1.96. d, Distribution of 95th percentile fd outliers using modified fd statistics (y axis) in six groups of cultivated tea populations (x axis). The white dot in the center of each violin plot represents the median value, and the bounds of each box indicate first (25%) and third (75%) quartiles. Minima and maxima are present in the lower and upper bounds of the whiskers, respectively, and the width of whiskers are densities of modified fd statistics. P values were calculated using two-sided Fisher’s exact test without multiple comparisons. e, Amount of unique and shared introgressed sequences (in Mb) among six groups of cultivated tea populations. f, Distribution of introgressed loci along chromosomes (chr) 1–15, with the colored bar indicating the maximum of modified fd statistics in each 100-kb non-overlapping window.

We observed discordance between 500 sampled individual gene trees and a species tree constructed using ASTRAL-III23 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Frequent cytonuclear conflicts between nuclear and chloroplast trees were also detected (Fig. 3a), supporting the reticulate evolution likely associated with hybridization. To determine the genetic introgression occurring between C. sinensis and its close relatives, we performed the f3 test for each triplet (a combination of P1, P2 and P3) within the species from section Thea with C. sinensis as P3. The f3 analysis showed significant adjusted negative Z scores (adjusted Z score < −1.96) in most tested triplets (Fig. 3c), indicating that extensive hybridization events, rather than incomplete lineage sorting, contributed to the complex evolutionary history of C. sinensis.

We further screened introgressed loci in cultivated tea by calculating the modified fd value24 and identified 1,485 genomic regions, comprising 172.2 Mb of sequences and 5.6% of the monoploid genome. The six geographic groups of cultivated tea populations displayed similar levels of introgressed sequences (Fig. 3d; ACS, 47.1 Mb; CSA, 57.5 Mb; HHA, 60.0 Mb; SFJ, 60.5 Mb; SSJ, 56.8 Mb; ZJNFJ, 59.8 Mb); however, only 2.6% (4.5 of 172.2 Mb) were shared. Each group had a large proportion (an average of 26.1%) of unique introgression loci, indicating independent introgression events during the parallel domestication of each population (Fig. 3e). In total, 98 genes were located in the 4.5-Mb regions, and these were significantly enriched in specific biological processes (Q < 0.05), including transporting ATPase activity and metalloexopeptidase activity (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Introgressed loci were not evenly distributed across different chromosomal regions (Fig. 3f). For instance, a large 50-Mb region in chromosome 7 displayed no introgression region. We observed extremely low π values in C. sinensis populations (Extended Data Fig. 10) and low heterozygosity in its close relatives (Supplementary Fig. 7) in 0–20 Mb and 40–50 Mb of this region, indicating a population bottleneck event or genetic hitchhiking due to natural selection in section Thea.

Extended Data Fig. 10.

Extended Data Fig. 10

Profiling of nucleotide diversity of C. sinensis populations showing an extremely low nucleotide diversity in 0–20 Mb and 40–50 Mb of chromosome 07.

Analysis of demographic history by estimating historical effective population size (Ne) showed that C. sinensis underwent two demographic bottlenecks, both coinciding with known periods of environmental change (Fig. 4). The first bottleneck event, observed for both CSS and CSA, maps to a dramatic temperature decline in the Gelasian epoch25 (2.59–1.81 Ma). However, the second Ne drop was restricted to CSS and occurred during the extremely low temperatures25 of the Last Glacial Maximum (26,500–19,000 years ago), followed by a rapid demographic expansion (Fig. 4). This analysis indicated a different evolutionary history after divergence between CSA and CSS.

Fig. 4. Demographic history of CSS and CSA.

Fig. 4

a, Historical effective population size Ne for CSS (top) and CSA (bottom). Stairway plot showing that C. sinensis underwent two bottlenecks during the known periods of major climate upheaval: the Gelasian epoch and the Last Glacial Maximum. The first one is shared by both CSS and CSA, and the second one is unique to CSS. b, Specific presentation of cultivated populations with ice core data for the past 4000,000 years (ref. 25).

Evidence of parallel domestication in CSA and CSS

To investigate genes related to early domestication and improvement in tea plants, we classified the CCSA and CCSS tea accessions into landraces and elite cultivars. Elite cultivars possess several highly desirable traits and have been certificated by the National Crop Variety Approval Committee in China. The remaining accessions were considered as landraces, while the ACSA served as the wild population with limited artificial selection. Based on stringent thresholds (Methods), we identified that 451 and 317 protein-coding genes were artificially selected in the early domestication processes in CSA and CSS landraces, respectively. Meanwhile, comparisons between landraces and elite cultivars revealed 448 and 615 genes under crop improvement, respectively (Fig. 5a,b). Collectively, 874 and 920 genes were domesticated in CSA and CSS, respectively; however, only 95 were shared, strongly suggesting parallel domestication processes for CSA and CSS.

Fig. 5. Signatures of artificial selection and evidence of parallel domestication in CSA and CSS.

Fig. 5

a, A proposed road map of parallel domestication in CSA and CSS. Early domestication involved genes related to glucoside and glycoside transport and photomorphogenesis and plant height in CSA and herbivore-induced chemicals in CSS. The improvement mainly focused on genes related to alkaloid and aromatic chemicals in CSA and genes related to cold stress and photomorphogenesis and plant height in CSS. The number of artificially selected genes are labeled in each domestication process. b, Genome-wide distribution of selective-sweep signals identified based on cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH). Genes with important functions that are linked to sweeps are highlighted in Manhattan plots. Genes that were involved in early domestication were identified based on a comparison between CSA and CSS landraces, and ACSA, while genes under improvement were selected based on a comparison between CSA and CSS elite, and CSA and CSS landraces. c, Signals of artificial selection in the XDH gene. Purple and green solid lines indicate Tajima’s D statistics in CSA landraces and CSA elite cultivars, respectively. The blue dashed line indicates the fixation index (FST) between CSA landrace and elite populations, while the red dashed line is the threshold of the top 5% FST. d, Signals of artificial selection in the CM (chorismate mutase) gene. Purple and green solid lines indicate Tajima’s D statistics in CSA landraces and CSA elite cultivars, respectively. e, Signals of artificial selection in the F3H gene. Left, F3H is one of the key genes in catechin biosynthetic pathways. Right, signals of artificial selection in this gene. f, Signals of artificial selection in BAS1 and DWF4 genes, related to plant height. The leftmost panel shows different morphological features in tea accessions. In contrast to ACSA, CCSA and CCSS are featured with decreased plant height, with most CCSA being small trees or semi-shrubs and CCSS being shrubs. Scale bar, 0.5 m. Middle and rightmost panels show signals of artificial selection in BAS1 and DWF4. g, Expression of artificially selected genes in the six tissues examined, including root (RT), stem (ST), flower (FL), bud (BD), young leaf (YL) and old leaf (OL).

Functional analysis showed that these domesticated genes were associated with a series of important biological processes. In the early domestication of CSA, the selected genes were significantly enriched for GO terms including glucoside transport, glycoside transport and (+)-abscisic acid d-glucopyranosyl ester transmembrane transport (Q < 0.01; Supplementary Fig. 8). The improvement process in CSA focused mainly on genes related to metabolism and biosynthesis of alkaloid and aromatic chemicals, including caffeine and pyruvate metabolism and phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, based on KEGG analysis (P < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 9). The CsXDH gene, encoding xanthine dehydrogenase–oxidase, involved in a caffeine-related pathway, showed significantly low Tajima’s D values in elite CSA accessions and a high FST score above the threshold (Fig. 5c). In addition, we observed an obvious difference in Tajima’s D values between CSA landraces and elite CSA in a CM (chorismate mutase) gene (Fig. 5d), leading to biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids in the shikimate pathway26.

The early domestication of CSS cultivars involved genes associated with plant defense against insects and herbivores (Supplementary Fig. 10). Meanwhile, these selected genes were also significantly enriched in biosynthesis of important secondary metabolites, including (R)-limonene, (E)-β-ocimene, pinene, myrcene and α-farnesene (P < 0.05 and Q < 0.05; Supplementary Figs. 11 and 12). This result suggested that herbivore-induced chemicals were likely targets during the early domestication of CSS landraces. The improvement process from landraces to elite cultivars mainly focused on genes significantly enriched in regulation of flower development and response to nitric oxide (NO; P < 0.05 and Q < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 13). Compared to CSA, CSS showed enhanced tolerance to cold stress and was therefore able to adapt to a relatively wide range of areas. A previous study showed that NO increased cold tolerance in tea plants by accelerating the consumption of γ-aminobutyric acid27, suggesting that these domesticated genes related to the response to NO likely conferred tolerance to cold stress in CSS.

Two domestication processes selected genes with important biological functions. F3H, involved in catechin biosynthesis, showed strong artificial selection, supported by a high FST score and a significantly low Tajima’s D statistic in CSS landraces compared to those of ACSA accessions (Fig. 5b,e). Two genes encoding cytochrome P450 (CsCYP734A1 (CsBAS1) and CsCYP90B1 (CsDWF4)), associated with photomorphogenesis, were also under artificial selection in the early domestication of CSA and the improvement process of CSS, respectively (Fig. 5f), likely contributing to reduced plant height in cultivated tea accessions. RNA-seq analysis further supported the potential functions of these selected genes in six different tissues (Fig. 5g).

Discussion

TGY is a world-renowned Oolong tea cultivar, which was selected during the reign of Yongzheng Emperor in the Qing Dynasty (1,723–1,735 A.D.). A ~300-year clonal propagation has led to accumulation of substantial somatic mutations in the genome, allowing us to separate the two haplotypes using our newly developed algorithms (Khaper15 and ALLHiC18) and identify allelic imbalance. ASEGs were classified into two major patterns: consistent ASEGs and inconsistent ASEGs (that is, a direction-shifting pattern). Consistent ASEGs had an allele with biased expression across all the tested tissues of tea plants, supporting a dominance effect on heterosis. Genes with expression biased toward one parental allele in some samples but shifted to another allele in other samples (that is, inconsistent ASEGs) indicate an overdominance effect28. In contrast to hybrid rice28, we observed considerably more consistent ASEGs than inconsistent ASEGs (1,528 versus 386) in C. sinensis, suggesting that the dominance effect played a major role in the highly heterozygous tea genome. The large number of consistent ASEGs is likely caused by accumulation of somatic mutations due to the long period of clonal propagation in tea plants. Study of the mechanism of widespread ASE possibly due to epigenetic modifications2932 is a further work that deserves much effort. Basing on our results, we propose that the dominance effect likely provides a potential mechanism to overcome mutation load in clonally propagated tea plants.

The two ancient bottlenecks in CSS, both coinciding with a dramatic temperature decline, should lead to a substantial reduction in population diversity and smaller Ne values compared to those of CSA, which only experienced one bottleneck. However, the reduced diversity in CSS was likely counterbalanced by extensive introgression over its evolutionary history. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a reticulate evolution due to extensive inter- and intraspecific introgression in section Thea. Pervasive introgression contributed to the high level of genetic diversity in CSS populations and possibly enhanced adaptation to diverse environments, leading to a rapid demographic expansion after the second bottleneck. A large number of modern tea accessions are clonally propagated, and the accumulation of somatic mutations also contributes to increased diversity in other crops, such as grapes33. A comparison between two TGY samples collected from Fujian and Anhui revealed a high level of genetic difference (0.71%), even in the same cultivar.

Our efforts to detect signatures of artificial selection provided evidence of parallel domestication in CSA and CSS. The two varieties possess distinct features, such as various aromatic chemicals, different plant heights and cold tolerance, which were likely targets of artificial selection over the domestication history. Our results uncovered that several protein-coding genes associated with these economically important traits underwent domestication. Key genes related to biosynthetic metabolism of alkaloid and aromatic chemicals, including caffeine and catechins, contributed to the feature of interest in tea plants. In contrast to ACSA, CCSA and CCSS have reduced plant height, with CSA being small trees or semi-shrubs and CSS being shrubs. The morphological modification (plant height) in CCSA and CCSS is likely associated with domestication, as two cytochrome P450 genes (CsCYP734A1 (CsBAS1) and CsCYP90B1 (CsDWF4)) associated with photomorphogenesis were under artificial selection in CSS and CSA cultivars, respectively. These two genes are involved in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Loss of function in the Arabidopsis dwf4 mutant results in dwarfism due to abnormal cell elongation34, while the double mutant in BAS1 along with its functionally redundant paralog (SOB7) displays elongated hypocotyl and decreased sensitivity to light35. Similar to wheat Rht genes and the rice sd1 gene36, the two genes CsBAS1 and CsDWF4 likely contributed to the Green Revolution in tea industry as they may have introduced dwarfing traits into this crop. In conclusion, this study provides important insights into genome evolution, allelic imbalance, population genetics and further directions for crop breeding of tea plants. Our newly developed genomic resources can advance molecular biology research and ultimately offer tools and knowledge for shortening the 20–25-year breeding cycle through gene-targeted improvement of the tea crop.

Methods

Sample collection and DNA sequencing

The TGY plant used for PacBio sequencing and de novo genome assembly was maintained by the Tea Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Leaves were collected from a single TGY individual, planted in the county of Anxi located in Fujian Province, China (119.576708 E, 27.215297 N). In addition, we constructed a comprehensive dataset by incorporating our resequenced data (129 samples) as well as recently published 61 non-redundant resequenced accessions9. A total of 190 Camellia accessions were used in the present study, containing 113 CSS, 48 CSA, one C. sinensis var. pubilimba, 15 C. taliensis, 12 closely related species and one C. oleifera as the outgroup. These tea accessions consisted of 51 elite cultivars, 92 landraces, 18 ancestral tea accessions and 12 wild closely related species from section Thea. Young leaves from each accession were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and transferred to the DNA sequencing provider (Annoroad Gene Technology) in Beijing. Genomic DNA from each sample was isolated using the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For PacBio long-read sequencing, we first applied the BluePippin system for size selection. SMRTbell libraries (30–50 kb) were then constructed according to the protocol released from PacBio. A total of three single-molecule real-time cells were sequenced on a PacBio Sequel II platform, generating 359 Gb of subreads. DNA samples that were used for whole-genome resequencing were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform with a read length of 150 bp and an insert size of 300–500 bp. In addition, the 10x Genomics library was constructed using high-molecular-weight DNA (>50 kb) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (https://support.10xgenomics.com/de-novo-assembly/library-prepr/doc/user-guide-chromium-genome-reagent-kit-v1-chemistry). Reads of approximately 300 Gb were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform with the 150-bp paired-end sequencing model.

Genome assembly and annotation

We assembled the TGY genome by incorporating Illumina short-read sequences and PacBio single-molecule real-time long-read sequences as well as sequences from high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) technologies. A total of 359 Gb (~114× coverage) of subreads generated from the PacBio Sequel II platform were subjected to self-correction, trimming and assembly. All three steps were accomplished using Canu17 (version 1.9) with optimized parameters designed for polyploid genomes to assemble heterozygous genome sequences as far as possible (batOptions, ‘-dg 3 -db 3 -dr 1 -ca 500 -cp 50’). To further correct systematic errors of PacBio sequencing, we generated ~183 Gb (58× coverage) of Illumina short reads from the same TGY individual. These short reads were mapped against the Canu initial genome assembly using BWA37 MEM with default parameters, and variants that were considered to result from sequencing errors were polished using Pilon38 with parameters ‘--mindepth 4 --threads 6 --tracks --changes --fix bases --verbose’.

We provided two levels of chromosome-scale assemblies, including a monoploid genome and a haplotype-resolved assembly. For the monoploid genome, we first used our newly developed program Khaper to select primary contigs and filter redundant sequences (Supplementary Note 1) from the initial Canu assembly. Results were then inspected based on BUSCO completeness and duplication score. Meanwhile, we constructed two high-quality Hi-C libraries using previously described methodology39. Chimeric DNA fragments that represented sequences from proximal regions were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform with the paired-end model. The resulting non-redundant contigs were subjected to ALLHiC scaffolding with a diploid model18 and then partitioned into 15 groups, representing 15 pseudo-chromosomes. The chromosome number and orientation were renamed according to the chromosome-scale assembly of CSS-SCZ published previously9 for comparison. For the haplotype-resolved genome assembly, we first detected misassembled contigs that displayed abnormal long-range contact patterns from paired-end read alignments against the Canu initial assembly using Juicer tools40 and the 3D-DNA pipeline16, and only the first round of Hi-C corrected contigs were retained for haplotype phasing. We further applied a read-depth strategy to identify and duplicate collapsed contigs in the Canu initial assembly (that is, phased contigs) (Supplementary Note 2). Along with the duplicated sequences, Canu phased contigs were subjected to haplotype phasing using the ALLHiC18 polyploid scaffolding model with the monoploid genome selected by Khaper15 as a reference to identify allelic contigs. Finally, two haplotypes (HA and HB) were fully resolved at the chromosomal level.

To annotate protein-coding genes, we applied the same method as described previously for the sugarcane genome41. Briefly, we integrated evidence from orthologous proteins, transcriptomes and ab initio gene prediction using the MAKER pipeline42. In addition, we used RepeatMasker43 and TEclass44 to annotate repetitive sequences. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of selected gene models were conducted with the OmicShare platform (www.omicshare.com/tools). Significance of enrichment was determined using Fisher’s exact test, with P values adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple-hypothesis-testing correction.

Estimation of switch errors in the phased assembly

A switch error indicates that a single base that is supposed to be present in one haplotype is incorrectly anchored onto another. This kind of assembly error is likely prevalent in the haplotype-resolved genome assembly. To detect switch errors in our phased chromosome-scale TGY genome assembly, we developed a new pipeline (calc_switchErr19), relying on a ‘true’ phased SNP dataset, which can be generated by incorporating PacBio long reads and 10x Genomics linked reads. The concept of the ‘true’ phased SNP dataset is to find consistently phased SNPs in PacBio read phasing and 10x read phasing. To achieve this, we first constructed an accurate variant-calling file (VCF) based on Illumina WGS short reads following the GATK45 best practices workflow suggested on the official website. Subsequently, approximately 80 Gb of PacBio long reads with length >10 kb were randomly selected and mapped against the reference genome using minimap2 (ref. 46) with the parameter ‘--secondary=no’, which means that only the best alignment was reported for each long read. The resulting BAM file along with the Illumina VCF was subjected to WhatsHap (version 1.1) phasing47 with default parameters, and the phased SNPs with the ‘PS’ label were extracted for further comparison. For phasing of 10x Genomics linked reads, we used proc10xG Python scripts (https://github.com/ucdavis-bioinformatics/proc10xG) to extract and trim reads of gem barcode information and primer sequences, respectively. This pipeline used BWA MEM for 10x linked reads mapping, and the resulting BAM file was also subjected to WhatsHap SNP phasing. Consistently phased SNPs in the two datasets were considered as ‘true’ phased SNPs, which were further used for assessment of ALLHiC phasing.

We next aligned two haplotypes in our ALLHiC assembly using the Nucmer program48 with parameters ‘--mum -l 100 -c 200 -g 200’, and variants were identified using show-snps with parameters ‘-Clr’, representing signatures of ALLHiC phasing. Subsequently, we compared ALLHiC phasing with the ‘true’ phased SNP dataset and identified switched bases if ALLHiC phased SNPs were inconsistent with the ‘true’ dataset. The pipeline with details of command lines is provided on GitHub (https://github.com/tangerzhang/calc_switchErr/).

Identification of allelic variations and ASEGs

Identification of alleles

We used the same method as we did for an autopolyploid sugarcane genome project to identify alleles41. Because haplotype-resolved genome assembly is available for the TGY genome, each allele can be annotated from DNA sequences. The allele definition can be achieved using a synteny-based strategy and a coordinate-based method. Synteny blocks between two haplotypes were identified using MCScanX49, and paired genes within each synteny block with high similarity were considered as alleles A and B. Gene models with exactly the same coding sequences were considered as a single allele. In addition, gene models that were not present in syntenic blocks were mapped against the monoploid assembly using GMAP50. Potential alleles were considered if two genes had more than 50% overlap on coordinates.

Analysis of allelic variations at the gene level

We used the MAFFT program51 for pairwise comparison of allelic genes with default parameters. The edit distance between two alleles was counted if any base substitution or indel was detected using the Text Levenshtein distance model, implemented in PERL. The similarity score was calculated as the number of unsubstituted bases divided by the length of the alignment block.

Analysis of haplotype variations at the genome level

Pairwise comparison between haplotypes was performed using LAST version 959 (ref. 52), using the ‘NEAR’ seeding scheme, which favors short and strong similarities that are assumed to occur between closely related sequences. Haplotype A for each chromosome was used as input ‘as is’, with no external repeat masking except for simple repeats using tantan53 (lastdb parameters ‘-P0 -uNEAR -R01’). LAST alignments were then performed with lastal parameters ‘-E0.05 -C2’, followed by splitting alignments into one-to-one matches using last-split54. LAST alignments resulted in one MAF file that contained all high-scoring segment pairs per pairwise chromosome comparison. These resulting high-scoring segment pairs form the basis for calculating sequence identities in each pairwise comparison. Identities between haplotypes were calculated based on 10-Mb non-overlapping windows at the most stringent level with no indels or gaps within an alignment block. To identify different types of genetic variations between haplotypes, the Nucmer48 program was used to map HB to HA genomic sequences, and SNPs were identified from the alignment file with ambiguous best matches. Furthermore, we applied Assemblytics55 to identify short indels (1–10 bp) and large structural variants on the basis of the alignments above.

Analysis of allelic-specific expression

RNA-seq reads from six tissues (root, stem, flower, bud, young leaves and mature leaves) were generated using three biological replicates. RNA-seq reads were trimmed using the Trimmomatic56 program and mapped against allele-aware annotated gene models using Bowtie57 with only the best alignment retained for each read. FPKM values were estimated using the RSEM program58, which was implemented in the Trinity package59. ASE was determined if the log fold change of FPKM values between two alleles was greater than 2 with P value <0.05 and false discovery rate <0.05. Two different ASE patterns were investigated in this study, including consistent ASE and direction-shifting ASE.

Functional annotation of differentially expressed genes

GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were performed using OmicShare tools (www.omicshare.com/tools). All functional enrichment analyses were calculated against a background gene set (that is, all predicted genes in the TGY genome), and background genes were submitted to the Mendeley database (10.17632/9nr63jfhtd.1) along with a functional annotation.

Population genomics

Variant calling

We sequenced a total of 7.2 Tb of paired-end reads on the Illumina NovoSeq platform. This resulted in an average coverage of 12.75× per accession. To avoid potential DNA contamination, such as index swapping, we constructed dual-indexed libraries with unique indices for each sample. Double indices contain a total of 16 bases and were inserted in the flanking regions of the target DNA fragments. This allowed us to unambiguously separate DNA sequences pooled from different libraries and avoided potential index hopping. In addition, raw reads that had any mismatch with index sequences were clustered as undetermined sequences and finally removed from our analysis. Adaptors and low-quality bases (Q < 30) were trimmed from raw reads using Trimmomatic56, and the resulting clean reads were aligned against the monoploid reference genome of TGY using BWA37 with default parameters. To analyze population genetics, we focused on SNPs and small indels (1–10 bp). These variants were identified using the GATK45 pipeline following the best practices workflow suggested on the official website. To remove erroneous mismatches around small indels, IndelRealigner was applied to process the alignment BAM files. HaplotypeCaller and GenotypeCaller were used to call variants from all samples. SNPs were subjected to quality control and removed if they met the following criteria: (1) SNPs only present in one of the two datasets (HaplotypeCaller and GenotypeCaller), (2) SNPs in repeat regions, (3) SNPs with read depth >1,000 or <5, (4) SNPs with missing rate >40%, (5) SNPs with <5-bp distance from nearby variant sites, (6) non-biallelic SNPs. The SnpEff60 program was used to annotate SNPs and large-effect SNPs with modification of start or stop codon, and alternative splice sites were extracted for further analysis. SNP accuracy was assessed based on manual checking of 100 randomly selected SNPs in JBrowse61, showing an accuracy of 95%.

Maximum-likelihood tree inference

The high-quality SNPs identified above were subjected to a second round of filtering to improve the accuracy and efficiency of phylogenetic analysis. We first identified single-copy genes in the TGY genome based on a self-BLAST approach. Annotated coding sequences were subjected to all-versus-all self-BLAST alignment with default parameters, and the genes that only had one single BLAST hit (that is, self-match) were considered single-copy genes. A total of 11,334 single-copy genes were identified based on our method. Nuclear SNPs were further extracted from genomic regions located in single-copy genic regions. For heterozygous SNP sites, the major alleles were determined and retained for further analysis if they had more Illumina reads supported than the secondary alleles. The resulting SNPs were converted to aligned FASTA format. Maximum-likelihood trees were constructed using two popular programs: IQ-TREE62 with self-estimated best substitution models and RAxML63 with the GTRCAT model. The two phylogenetic trees were reconstructed based on 1,000 bootstrapping replicates, showing similar topology structures from the two programs.

Admixture analysis

Admixture22 software was used to infer the ancestral population among the resequenced tea accessions with different k values (from 1 to 10) tested. To avoid parameter standard errors, we allowed testing with 2,000 bootstraps. The optimal ancestral population structure was determined based on cross-validation error, with k = 7 showing the smallest cross-validation error and thus considered to be the best population size.

PCA, diversity statistics and linkage disequilibrium decay estimation

PLINK1.9 and VCFtools64 version 0.1.16 were used to perform PCA and other population divergency statistics, including nucleotide diversity and genetic differentiation (FST). Linkage disequilibrium decay was calculated using PopLDdecay (version 3.31; https://github.com/BGI-shenzhen/PopLDdecay) with default parameters, and the decay distance of linkage disequilibrium indicates the Pearson’s correlation efficient (r2) decreased to half of the maximum.

Demographic analysis

We first calculated site-frequency spectrum (SFS) using ANGSD65. BAM files generated from each accession were filtered with parameters ‘-only_proper_pairs 1 -uniqueOnly 1 -remove_bads 1 -minQ 20 -minMap 30’. After that, we used the ‘-doSaf’ parameter to calculate the site allele-frequency likelihood based on individual genotype likelihoods, assuming HWE, and then used the realSFS with expectation–maximization algorithm to obtain a maximum-likelihood estimate of the folded SFS. The stairway plot66 was used for estimating the population demography history. Stairway plot was performed with 200 bootstraps, a generation time of 3 years and a mutation rate per generation per site of 6.5 × 10−9.

Inference of selective sweeps

Patterns of selective sweeps associated with artificial selection were investigated based on three genetic differentiation metrics, including XP-EHH67 and Tajima’s D-test as well as population fixation statistics (FST). To avoid false positive signals, we first filtered 26,318,206 of 35,725,355 (73.7%) SNPs located at TE regions, 12,030 of 35,725,355 (0.03%) SNPs at NUMT regions and 4,496 of 35,725,355 (0.01%) SNPs at NUPT regions before sweep finding. Subsequently, we applied the XP-EHH approach to identify positive selection sites by measuring cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity, which was implemented in the selscan program (https://github.com/szpiech/selscan). The XP-EHH score for each chromosome was calculated individually, and the top 5% sites with positive XP-EHH values were considered as signals for candidate selective sweeps. These candidate selective sweeps were further validated using Tajima’s D statistic and FST analysis. Tajima’s D statistic was calculated in sliding windows with a 10-kb window size and a 5-kb step size using the ANGSD program65, and the empirical lowest 5% windows were retained for validation of the candidate selective sweeps identified by XP-EHH. Similarly, FST values were calculated in VCFtools using the same sliding window size, and the top 5% regions were retained. XP-EHH candidate regions either supported by Tajima’s D statistic or the FST value between two tested populations were considered as the final set of selective sweeps.

Identification of introgressed loci

f3 analysis

To detect introgression between cultivated tea plants and close relatives, we calculated f3 values using the program ADMIXTOOLS22; Z scores were adjusted based on a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery-rate correction method.

ABBA–BABA analysis

To detect introgression between cultivated tea plants and close relatives, we calculated the Patterson’s D statistic using the program doAbbababa2, implemented in ANGSD62. Patterson’s D statistic is widely used to examine site patterns (also known as ABBA–BABA patterns68) in genome alignments for a specified four-taxon tree. Given four taxa with the relationship ‘((P1, P2), P3), O’, a D statistic significantly different from zero indicates introgression between populations P1 and P3 (negative D value) or between P2 and P3 (positive D value)69.

Modified fd statistics

Introgressed loci were identified based on the modified four-taxon fd statistics22, which is a modified version of a statistic originally developed to evaluate admixture at a genome-wide level. C. oleifera was used as an outgroup to infer phylogeny of the tested triplets (P1, P2 and P3), with a combination of any of the four cultivated tea populations (P2) and close relatives from Camellia section Thea (P1 or P3). Modified fd statistics were calculated for each 100-kb non-overlapping window with the high-quality of SNP data identified above as input using a set of Python scripts (https://github.com/simonhmartin/genomics_general/blob/master/ABBABABAwindows.py). Windows with a negative Patterson’s D statistic and fd > 1 were ignored as suggested24. Within each cultivated tea population, we used a threshold of the 95th percentile to detect outliers of the fd distribution that could be considered as introgressed loci from close relatives.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41588-021-00895-y.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (3.3MB, pdf)

Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, Figs. 1–13 and Tables 1–13 and 15–17

Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 14 (24.5KB, xlsx)

Information and statistics of resequenced tea accessions.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD1002100 to M.Y.), two projects funded by the State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops (nos. SKL2018001 and SKL20190012 to X.Z.) and the Ministerial and Provincial Joint Innovation Centre for Ecological Pest Control of Fujian–Taiwan Crops, Chinese Oolong Tea Industry Innovation Center (Cultivation) special project (J2015-75 to N.Y.). We thank H. Huang, L. Han and F. Huang for their kind assistance in collection of tea plant samples; and Y. Tan and B. Chen for identification of plant samples. We received editing assistance from Life Science Editors.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 2. Synteny analysis between TGY monoploid genome assembly with CSA-YK10 and CSS-SCZ assemblies.

Extended Data Fig. 2

The top 20 longest scaffolds from CSA-YK10 genome and CSS-SCZ genome were extracted for the snyteny analysis and only five of them were randomly selected for visualization a-j. Synteny analysis was also shown between TGY and SCZ genomes at chromosome level k.

Author contributions

M.Y., X.Z. and H.T. designed this project and coordinated research activities; L.S., P.W., N.Y., X.K., G.H., Z.L., G.W. and H.H. collected and provided plant materials; X.Z., S.Z, J.Y. and Y.W. assembled the genome; D.Z. and X.Z. developed the Khaper program to resolve the heterozygous genome assembly; X.Z., J.Y. and S.Z. developed a new pipeline to estimate switch errors in haplotype-resolved genome assembly; X.X., R.Q., W.W., Q.Z., Y.S. and Yunran Ma performed gene annotation; X.X., R.Q., L.W. and D.M. analyzed allelic imbalance; S.C., X.M., X.Z., Yaying Ma, L.Z. and R.L. analyzed population resequencing data; D.G., S.C. and J.L. contributed to introgression analysis; X.Z., M.Y., S.C., L.V., H.T., H.W. and R.M. interpreted data and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Data availability

Raw sequencing reads from PacBio, Illumina, 10× Genomics, Hi-C, RNA-seq and Iso-seq were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database under the accession number PRJNA665594 and/or in the GSA database (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa/) under the accession number PRJCA003090. The assembly and annotation were archived in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under the accession number JAFLEL000000000 and in the GWH (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/) under accession numbers GWHASIV00000000 for the monoploid and GWHASIX00000000 for the haplotype-resolved genome. VCF files that contain all clean SNPs were uploaded to the Mendeley database (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7hb33vd7sf/1). In addition, three datasets that were used to assess switch errors in the haplotype-resolved TGY genome assembly were deposited to the Mendeley database (10.17632/xpccyg5w2x.1).

Code availability

The Khaper algorithm is freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/lardo/khaper), and calc_switchErr can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/tangerzhang/calc_switchErr/). Codes (Khaper and calc_switchErr) were also archived on Zenodo with the DOIs 10.5281/zenodo.4780792 and 10.5281/zenodo.4780666 and are cited in refs. 15,19.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Genetics thanks Victor Albert, Jean Marc Aury, and Xiachun Wan for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally to this work: Xingtan Zhang, Shuai Chen, Longqing Shi, Daping Gong.

Contributor Information

Xingtan Zhang, Email: zhangxingtan@caas.cn.

Haibao Tang, Email: tanghaibao@gmail.com.

Minsheng You, Email: msyou@fafu.edu.cn.

Extended data

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41588-021-00895-y.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41588-021-00895-y.

References

  • 1.McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputié A. The evolutionary ecology of clonally propagated domesticated plants. New Phytol. 2010;186:318–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Muller HJ. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 1932;66:118–138. doi: 10.1086/280418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Orive ME. Somatic mutations in organisms with complex life histories. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2001;59:235–249. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hayat K, Iqbal H, Malik U, Bilal U, Mushtaq S. Tea and its consumption: benefits and risks. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015;55:939–954. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.678949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meegahakumbura MK, et al. Indications for three independent domestication events for the tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) and new insights into the origin of tea germplasm in China and India revealed by nuclear microsatellites. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu H, et al. Earliest tea as evidence for one branch of the Silk Road across the Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:18955. doi: 10.1038/srep18955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kaison, C. World Tea Production and Trade. Current and Future Development. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015).
  • 8.Banerjee, B. Botanical classification of tea. In Tea (eds. Willson, K. C. & Clifford, M. N.) 25–51 (Springer, 1992).
  • 9.Xia, E. et al. The reference genome of tea plant and resequencing of 81 diverse accessions provide insights into its genome evolution and adaptation. Mol. Plant13, 1013–1026 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Wang, X. et al. Population sequencing enhances understanding of tea plant evolution. Nat. Commun.11, 4447 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Zhang W, et al. Genome assembly of wild tea tree DASZ reveals pedigree and selection history of tea varieties. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3719. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17498-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang, W. et al. A phased genome based on single sperm sequencing reveals crossover pattern and complex relatedness in tea plants. Plant J. 105, 197–208 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Fuchinoue Y. Analysis of self-incompatibility alleles of major varieties of tea. Jpn Agr. Res. Q. 1979;13:43–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zheng Y, et al. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling reveal novel insights into volatile heterosis in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) Molecules. 2019;24:3380. doi: 10.3390/molecules24183380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhan, D. & Zhang, X. Khaper: a k-mer based haplotype caller (version 1.0). Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.4780792 (2020).
  • 16.Dudchenko O, et al. De novo assembly of the Aedesaegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science. 2017;356:92–95. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koren S, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Ming R, Tang H. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat. Plants. 2019;5:833–845. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0487-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang, X. calc_switchErr: calculating switch errors in the haplotype-resolved assembly (version 1.0). Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.4780666 (2021).
  • 20.Kawarazaki T, et al. A low temperature-inducible protein AtSRC2 enhances the ROS-producing activity of NADPH oxidase AtRbohF. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:2775–2780. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006;23:254–267. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patterson N, et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics. 2012;192:1065–1093. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.145037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang C, Rabiee M, Sayyari E, Mirarab S. ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:153. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2129-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin SH, Davey JW, Jiggins CD. Evaluating the use of ABBA–BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:244–257. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Petit JR, et al. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature. 1999;399:429–436. doi: 10.1038/20859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herrmann KM, Weaver LM. The shikimate pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999;50:473–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Y, et al. Effects of nitric oxide on the GABA, polyamines, and proline in tea (Camellia sinensis) roots under cold stress. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:12240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69253-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shao L, et al. Patterns of genome-wide allele-specific expression in hybrid rice and the implications on the genetic basis of heterosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:5653–5658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820513116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang H, et al. CG gene body DNA methylation changes and evolution of duplicated genes in cassava. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:13729–13734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519067112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song Q, Zhang T, Stelly DM, Chen ZJ. Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genome Biol. 2017;18:99. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1229-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang M, et al. Asymmetric subgenome selection and cis-regulatory divergence during cotton domestication. Nat. Genet. 2017;49:579–587. doi: 10.1038/ng.3807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang M, et al. Genome-wide high resolution parental-specific DNA and histone methylation maps uncover patterns of imprinting regulation in maize. Genome Res. 2014;24:167–176. doi: 10.1101/gr.155879.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vondras AM, et al. The genomic diversification of grapevine clones. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:972. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6211-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Choe, S. et al. The DWF4 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a cytochrome P450 that mediates multiple 22α-hydroxylation steps in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Cell10, 231–243 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Turk EM, et al. BAS1 and SOB7 act redundantly to modulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis via unique brassinosteroid inactivation mechanisms: genetic interactions between BAS1 and SOB7. Plant J. 2005;42:23–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hedden P. The genes of the Green Revolution. Trends Genet. 2003;19:5–9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Walker BJ, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xie T, et al. De novo plant genome assembly based on chromatin interactions: a case study of Arabidopsisthaliana. Mol. Plant. 2015;8:489–492. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Durand NC, et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 2016;3:95–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang J, et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:1565–1573. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cantarel BL, et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2007;18:188–196. doi: 10.1101/gr.6743907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tarailo‐Graovac M, Chen N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:4.10.1–4.10.14. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abrusan G, Grundmann N, DeMester L, Makalowski W. TEclass—a tool for automated classification of unknown eukaryotic transposable elements. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1329–1330. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McKenna A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Patterson M, et al. WhatsHap: weighted haplotype assembly for future-generation sequencing reads. J. Comput. Biol. 2015;22:498–509. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kurtz, S. et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R12 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Wang Y, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e49. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wu TD, Watanabe CK. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:1859–1875. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nakamura T, Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K. Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2490–2492. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kielbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011;21:487–493. doi: 10.1101/gr.113985.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Frith MC. A new repeat-masking method enables specific detection of homologous sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e23. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Frith MC, Kawaguchi R. Split-alignment of genomes finds orthologies more accurately. Genome Biol. 2015;16:106. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0670-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nattestad M, Schatz MC. Assemblytics: a web analytics tool for the detection of variants from an assembly. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3021–3023. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Haas BJ, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:1494–1512. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cingolani P, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Buels R, et al. JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17:66. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Danecek P, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:356. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu X, Fu Y-X. Exploring population size changes using SNP frequency spectra. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:555–559. doi: 10.1038/ng.3254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sabeti, P. C. et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature. 2007;449:913–918. doi: 10.1038/nature06250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zheng Y, Janke A. Gene flow analysis method, the D-statistic, is robust in a wide parameter space. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:10. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-2002-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Durand EY, Patterson N, Reich D, Slatkin M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2239–2252. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (3.3MB, pdf)

Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, Figs. 1–13 and Tables 1–13 and 15–17

Reporting Summary (1.2MB, pdf)
Supplementary Table 14 (24.5KB, xlsx)

Information and statistics of resequenced tea accessions.

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing reads from PacBio, Illumina, 10× Genomics, Hi-C, RNA-seq and Iso-seq were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database under the accession number PRJNA665594 and/or in the GSA database (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa/) under the accession number PRJCA003090. The assembly and annotation were archived in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under the accession number JAFLEL000000000 and in the GWH (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/) under accession numbers GWHASIV00000000 for the monoploid and GWHASIX00000000 for the haplotype-resolved genome. VCF files that contain all clean SNPs were uploaded to the Mendeley database (https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7hb33vd7sf/1). In addition, three datasets that were used to assess switch errors in the haplotype-resolved TGY genome assembly were deposited to the Mendeley database (10.17632/xpccyg5w2x.1).

The Khaper algorithm is freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/lardo/khaper), and calc_switchErr can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/tangerzhang/calc_switchErr/). Codes (Khaper and calc_switchErr) were also archived on Zenodo with the DOIs 10.5281/zenodo.4780792 and 10.5281/zenodo.4780666 and are cited in refs. 15,19.


Articles from Nature Genetics are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES