Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 6;11:16054. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95649-5

Table 7.

Comparison of the NaX nanozeolites with other adsorbents for removal MG and AO.

Adsorbent Dye Adsorbent dosage Concentration pH Time Removal/adsorption capacity Ref
Fe3O4/β-cyclodextrin-graphene oxide MG 5 mg 100 mg L−1 7 2 h 98% 55
Amberlite XAD-4 (polymeric resin) MG 1.5 g 10 mg L−1 10 10 min 93.12% 56
Sodium alginate-coated Fe3O4 MG 0.03 g 10 7 20 min 47.84 mg g-1 57
Polyacrylamide-g Chitosan γ-Fe2O3 MG 0.75 g 60 mg L−1 6 170 min 77% 58
Fe3O4/ activated carbon MG 0.1 g 100 mg L−1 6 1 h 96% 59
NaX nanozeolites MG 347 mg 4 mg L−1 8 11.5 min 99.07% This work
Fe3O4/melamine-rich covalent organic polymer AO 12 mg 10 mg L−1 6.5 4 min 107.11 mg g-1 60
Multiwall carbon nanotubes AO 40 mg 10 mg L−1 7 1 h 97% 61
M5Ca AO 16 mg 5 mg L−1 9.5 8 min 17.95 mg g-1 62
Diospyros lotus seed powder AO 0.1 g 20 mg L−1 6 2 h 26.95 mg g-1 63
Sugarcane bagasse AO 0.05 g 200 mg L−1 8 9 h 682.8 mg g-1 64
Aca-NaAlg-cl-poly(AA) AO 0.4 g 16 mg L−1 9 20 h 97.49% 65
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) functionalized magnetite nanoparticles AO 20 mg 20 mg L−1 6.5 40 min 74% 66
NaX nanozeolites AO 347 mg 4 mg L−1 8 11.5 min 99.61% This work

aMetal organic framework-5 (MOF-5) and melamine-terephthaldehyde-based intergrade two imensional π-conjugated covalent organic framework (COF).