Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;15(2):82–86. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.014

Table 1. Mean ± standard deviations (SD) of shear bond strength values (MPa) and frequency (%) of fracture patterns in the study groups.

Adhesive strategy Surface contaminations Shear bond strength (MPa) Fracture patterns (%)
Mean ± SD Adhesive Cohesive Mixed
Etch-and-Rinse Control 29.58 ± 3.81A 0 (0%) 4 (33.33%) 8 (66.66%)
Blood 13.74 ± 3.60BC 4 (33.33%) 0 (0%) 8 (66.66%)
Saliva 15.07 ± 5.47BC 5 (41.6%) 0 (0%) 7 (58.4%)
Aluminium Cl 20.47 ± 5.36BD 5 (41.6%) 0 (0%) 7 (58.4%)
Ferric Sulfate 18.00 ± 3.66B 4 (33.33%) 0 (0%) 8 (66.66%)
Disclosing Agent 25.08 ± 3.60AD 4 (33.33%) 4 (33.33%) 4 (33.33%)
Self-etch Control 28.59 ± 2.27A 0 (0%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%)
Blood 12.32 ± 2.73B 5 (41.6%) 0 (0%) 7 (58.4%)
Saliva 11.53 ± 4.00B 3 (25%) 0 (0%) 9 (75%)
Aluminium Cl 17.74 ± 4.14B 7 (58.4%) 0 (0%) 5 (41.6%)
Ferric Sulfate 13.71 ± 4.17B 5 (41.6%) 0 (0%) 7 (58.4%)
Disclosing Agent 24.82 ± 4.59A 4 (33.33%) 4 (33.33%) 4 (33.33%)

Different superscripts represent statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).