Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):3447. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153447

Table 1.

Factors impacting the choice of TAVR over iSAVR.

TAVR < 75 Years n = 104
Prohibitive surgical risk, n (%) 1 8 (7.7)
Porcelain aorta, n (%) 1 9 (8.7)
High-risk reoperation, n (%) 42 (40.4)
Respiratory impairment, n (%) 41 (39.4)
Severely reduced LVEF, n (%) 34 (32.7)
Severe renal insufficiency, n (%) 32 (30.8)
Substance abuse, n (%) 23 (22.1)
Adipositas per magna, n (%) 16 (15.4)
Valve-in-Valve procedure, n (%) 13 (12.5)
Neurological impairment, n (%) 12 (11.5)
Hepatopathy, n (%) 10 (9.6)
History of radiation to the chest, n (%) 9 (8.7)
Severe mental disorder, n (%) 9 (8.7)
Pulmonary hypertension, n (%) 7 (6.7)
Frailty, n (%) 3 (2.9)
Severe rhythm disorder, n (%) 2 (1.9)
History of severe bleeding, n (%) 1 (1.0)
Other, n (%) 17 (16.3)
Patients with 2 or more reasons listed above 74 (71.2)
Patients with 3 or more reasons listed above 35 (33.7)

1 Excluded from analysis due to absolute SAVR contraindications; LVEF—left ventricular ejection fraction; iSAVR—isolated surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVR—transcatheter aortic valve replacement.