Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 28;22(15):8104. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158104

Table 1.

Dam body composition and pregnancy outcomes. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. Con, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. Ob using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, Kruskal–Wallis test for nonparametric data (gestation length and litter size) or ANOVA performed on log-transformed data (PN2 weight). E15.5 = embryonic day 15.5. ns = not significant. PN2 = postnatal day 2.

Con Ob Ob-Met p-Value
Dams at E15.5 n = 15 n = 13 n = 6–7
Body weight (g) 36.0 ± 0.7 49.0 ± 0.8 *** 44.9 ± 1.2 ***,# <0.0001
Lean mass (g) 23.9 ± 0.7 24.7 ± 0.6 23.9 ± 0.6 ns
Fat mass (g) 4.5 ± 0.3 15.6 ± 0.6 *** 12.4± 0.6 ***,### <0.0001
Fat mass (%) 12.5 ± 0.7 31.7 ± 0.9 *** 27.6 ± 0.9 ***,### <0.0001
Pregnancy outcome n = 24–31 n = 30–33 n = 20–26
Gestation length (d) 20 [19, 20] 20 [21, 22] 21 [20.3–21] ***,## <0.0001
Litter size (no pups) 7.0 [6.0–9.0] 6.0 [5.0–7.0] ** 6.0 [5.0–7.0] * 0.0015
PN2 weight (g/pup) 1.9 ± 0.04 1.6 ± 0.04 **** 1.7 ± 0.04 *** <0.0001