Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;10(15):3393. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153393

Table 1.

Included studies of weaning in NAVA versus conventional modes of ventilation in children.

Reference Study Population Type of Study Outcome Measures
Duration of Weaning PICU Length of Stay Sedative Use Re-Intubation within 24 h Mortality Complications of Ventilation
Kallio 2015
[27]
Invasively ventilated children 0–16 years, n = 170 Randomised
Controlled
Trial
Median 3.3 versus 6.6 h (NS) Median 49.5 versus 72.8 h (p = 0.03, per-protocol analysis) Mean difference in sedation units −1.43 units (95% CI −2.79 to −0.07; p = 0.03) No difference n = 3 (NAVA group) vs. n = 4 (control) No difference n = 0 (NAVA group) vs. n = 2 (control) Accidental extubation n = 1 vs. n = 2
Piastra 2014
[29]
Children ventilated for ARDS, n = 30 Cohort Mean 41 (±17) versus 72.5 (±44) h (p = 0.011) No difference COMFORT score mean 18.1 (±2.1) vs. 25.3 (±7, p = 0.004) for same average dose Not reported No deaths during study period, 2 later deaths in each cohort Not reported
Sood 2019
[30]
Children recovering following cardiac surgery on CPB, n = 75 Cohort Median total ventilation days 9 (IQR 4) vs. 11 (IQR 7.5, p = 0.0128) Median 9 days (IQR 4) versus 13.5 days (IQR 7.5, p < 0.0001) Fentanyl days 9 (IQR 5) vs. 12.5 (IQR 7, p < 0.0001) Midazolam days 8 (IQR 4) vs. 12 (IQR 7, p < 0.0001) 2.9 % vs. 20% (p = 0.032), OR for successful extubation 8.5 (95% CI 1.01 to 71.8) Not reported Not reported

Abbreviations: NS = not significant; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; IQR = interquartile range.