Table 2.

Quality Assessment–JBI cross-section study.

Author, Year, [Reference]	Inclusion Criteria Defined	Subject, Setting Described	Exposure Valid Reliable	Objective Standard Criteria	Confounders Identified	Confounder Strategies	Outcomes Valid Reliable	Appropriate Stats Analysis
Bzduskova, 2018 [32]	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
Craig, 2017 [36]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Dalton, 2013 [38]	-	+	+	+	-	-	+	+
De Vos, 2020 [33]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Greene, 2012 [28]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Hasegawa, 2019 [34]	+	-	+	+	-	-	+	+
Heebner, 2015 [25]	+	-	+	+	-	-	+	+
Jimenez-Moreno, 2019 [39]	-	-	+	-	+	+	+	+
Leiros-Rodriguez, 2016 [27]	-	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
Liu, 2012 [29]	-	-	+	+	-	-	+	+
Mancini 1, 2016 [35]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Martinez-Mendez, 2011 [26]	+	-	+	+	-	-	+	+
Matsushima, 2015 [40]	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
O’Brien, 2019 [42]	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
Rivolta, 2019 [30]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Senanayake, 2013 [43]	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
Spain, 2012 [37]	+	-	+	+	+	+	+	+
Tang, 2019 [31]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Velazquez-Perez, 2020 [41]	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+

¹ Both reliability and validity sub-studies.