Table 2.
Output Data of the Two Full Factorial Designs (21.31) Analysis of TP and LP Formulations and the Predicted and Observed Values for the Selected TP (TP4) and LP (LP1)
| Responses | EE% | PS (nm) | PDI | ZP (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adequate precision (TP) | 33.46 | 10.96 | 6.08 | 26.75 |
| Adjusted R2 (TP) | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.98 |
| Predicted R2 (TP) | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.21 | 0.96 |
| Significant factors (TP) | X1, X2 | X1, X2 | X2 | X1, X2 |
| Predicted value of selected formula (TP4) | 84.18 | 578.65 | 0.56 | −12.50 |
| Observed value of selected formula (TP4) | 84.14 | 578.65 | 0.56 | −12.50 |
| Adequate precision (LP) | 40.77 | 41.35 | 25.51 | 12.06 |
| Adjusted R2 (LP) | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.92 |
| Predicted R2(LP) | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
| Significant factors (LP) | X1, X2 | X1, X2 | X2 | X1, X2 |
| Predicted value of selected formula (LP1) | 78.47 | 102.41 | 0.28 | 32.50 |
| Observed value of selected formula (LP1) | 78.47 | 102.41 | 0.28 | 32.50 |
Abbreviations: EE%, entrapment efficiency percentage; PS, particle size; PDI, polydispersity index; TP, terpesomes; LP, leciplex, and ZP; zeta potential.