Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 7:1–33. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s13369-021-05880-5

Table 8.

Comparative analysis of the classification results of the best performing 9 models during experiments 11 and 13

Experiment-11 Metric-1 Metric-2 Metric-3 Experiment-13 Metric-1 Metric-2 Metric-3
Image nets F1 AUC Accuracy Image nets F1 AUC Accuracy
ResNet50V2 0.80426 0.84035 0.89550 MobileNet 0.98763 0.97856 0.98565
Xception 0.84660 0.86301 0.89206 InceptionResNetV2 0.96547 0.95635 0.98615
DCGAN 0.93642 0.93348 0.93476 ResNet50V2 0.98236 0.96584 0.99655
LSTMCNN 0.97457 0.97895 0.97456 LSTMCNN 0.97845 0.98746 0.97855
U-Net(Glaucoma) 0.96805 0.98069 0.98660 U-Net(Glaucoma) 0.89233 0.98698 0.98524
Proposed Model 0.98630 0.98604 0.98936 Proposed Model 0.89975 0.98555 0.92126
Covid research paper 0.97456 0.95479 0.96470 Covid research paper 0.96325 0.98464 0.97456
ResNet-101V2 0.8924 0.9124 0.9010 ResNet-101V2 0.8947 0.9214 0.9007
NASNet Large 0.96548 0.94756 0.94752 NASNet Large 0.94365 0.96412 0.97413
DarkNet-53 + MobileNetV2 + Resnet-101 + NASNet Large + Xception + GoogLeNet 0.95686 0.97845 0.98875 DarkNet-53 + MobileNetV2 + Resnet-101 + NASNet Large + Xception + GoogLeNet 0.97878 0.98747 0.99785