Table 8.
Comparative analysis of the classification results of the best performing 9 models during experiments 11 and 13
Experiment-11 | Metric-1 | Metric-2 | Metric-3 | Experiment-13 | Metric-1 | Metric-2 | Metric-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image nets | F1 | AUC | Accuracy | Image nets | F1 | AUC | Accuracy |
ResNet50V2 | 0.80426 | 0.84035 | 0.89550 | MobileNet | 0.98763 | 0.97856 | 0.98565 |
Xception | 0.84660 | 0.86301 | 0.89206 | InceptionResNetV2 | 0.96547 | 0.95635 | 0.98615 |
DCGAN | 0.93642 | 0.93348 | 0.93476 | ResNet50V2 | 0.98236 | 0.96584 | 0.99655 |
LSTMCNN | 0.97457 | 0.97895 | 0.97456 | LSTMCNN | 0.97845 | 0.98746 | 0.97855 |
U-Net(Glaucoma) | 0.96805 | 0.98069 | 0.98660 | U-Net(Glaucoma) | 0.89233 | 0.98698 | 0.98524 |
Proposed Model | 0.98630 | 0.98604 | 0.98936 | Proposed Model | 0.89975 | 0.98555 | 0.92126 |
Covid research paper | 0.97456 | 0.95479 | 0.96470 | Covid research paper | 0.96325 | 0.98464 | 0.97456 |
ResNet-101V2 | 0.8924 | 0.9124 | 0.9010 | ResNet-101V2 | 0.8947 | 0.9214 | 0.9007 |
NASNet Large | 0.96548 | 0.94756 | 0.94752 | NASNet Large | 0.94365 | 0.96412 | 0.97413 |
DarkNet-53 + MobileNetV2 + Resnet-101 + NASNet Large + Xception + GoogLeNet | 0.95686 | 0.97845 | 0.98875 | DarkNet-53 + MobileNetV2 + Resnet-101 + NASNet Large + Xception + GoogLeNet | 0.97878 | 0.98747 | 0.99785 |