Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 8;229:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.008

Table 3:

ANCOVA comparing VSQOL scores across VFL severity categories adjusting for covariates

Vision-Specific Quality of Life Measures Adjusted Mean Scores (SE)* Visual Field Loss Severity Categories (n = 4,207)
No VFL (n = 2,348) Unilateral Bilateral P-Value§
Mild (n = 848) Moderate to Severe (n = 92) Mild (n = 792) Moderate to Severe (n = 127)

NEI-VFQ-25
Item Response Theory
 IRT Task Composite 86.8 (0.3)a 84.3 (0.6)b 84.9 (1.7)a,b 82.5 (0.6)b 76.9 (1.5)c < 0.001
 IRT Well-Being Composite 76.9 (0.3)a 75.2 (0.5)b 73.4 (1.4)a,b,c 73.5 (0.5)c 70.7 (1.2)d < 0.001
Classical Test Theory
 CTT Composite§ 94.7 (0.1)a 93.7 (0.2)b 93.7 (0.6)a,b 93.0 (0.2)b 90.7 (0.6)c < 0.001
 Driving Difficulties 95.7 (0.3)a 93.5 (0.4)b 95.3 (1.3)a,b 93.0 (0.5)b 85.0 (1.3)c < 0.001
 General Vision 75.1 (0.3)a 73.0 (0.5)b 71.7 (1.5)a,b,c 70.4 (0.5)c 68.6 (1.3)d < 0.001
 Near Vision 95.2 (0.2)a 93.9 (0.4)a,b 94.3 (1.1)a,b 92.7 (0.4)b 90.2 (0.9)c < 0.001
 Vision-Related Mental Health 91.4 (0.2)a 89.9 (0.4)a,b 89.1 (1.2)a,b 89.0 (0.4)b 86.4 (1.0)c < 0.001
 Peripheral Vision 98.1 (0.2)a 96.9 (0.3)b 96.5 (0.9)a,b 96.6 (0.3)b 94.1 (0.8)c < 0.001
 Distance Vision 97.4 (0.2)a 96.7 (0.3)a,b 96.9 (0.9)a,b 95.8 (0.3)b 93.5 (0.8)c < 0.001
 Vision-Related Role Function 96.9 (0.3)a 96.2 (0.4)a 95.8 (1.3)a 95.8 (0.5)a 93.0 (1.1)b 0.010
 Vision-Related Dependency 99.1 (0.2)a 98.4 (0.3)a 98.9 (0.8)a 98.1 (0.3)a 96.7 (0.7)b 0.001
 Vision-Related Social Function 99.2 (0.1)a 98.6 (0.2)a 98.5 (0.6)a 98.5 (0.2)a 97.8 (0.5)b < 0.001
 Ocular Pain 94.9 (0.2)a 94.3 (0.4)a 94.8 (1.2)a 93.9 (0.4)a 92.6 (1.0)b 0.058
 Color Vision 99.2 (0.1)a 99.1 (0.2)a 99.5 (0.6)a 99.1 (0.2)a 98.9 (0.5)b 0.872
General Health Item
 General Health 58.3 (0.4)a 56.5 (0.7)a,b 55.1 (2.2)a,b,c 55.0 (0.8)b,c 52.1 (1.9)c < 0.001
SF-12
 Mental Component Score 60.5 (0.1)a 59.7 (0.2)a,b 60.8 (0.6)a,b 59.9 (0.2)b 60.4 (0.6)a,b 0.008
 Physical Component Score 39.8 (0.1)a 39.9 (0.1)a 39.8 (0.5)a 39.9 (0.2)a 39.0 (0.4)a 0.334

ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; VSQOL = Vision-Specific Quality of Life; VFL = Visual Field Loss; AFEDS = African American Eye Disease Study; NEI-VFQ-25 = National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25-Item; IRT = Item Response Theory; CTT = Classical Test Theory; SF-12 = 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; MD = Mean Deviation

*

Adjusted mean (standard error) NEI-VFQ-25 and SF-12 scores. The covariates for adjustment include age, gender, education, employment status, income, comorbidities, health insurance, vision insurance, and presenting visual acuity 20/40 or worse.

VFL was classified as none (MD > −2), unilateral mild VFL (−6 ≤ MD ≤ −2 in the worse eye), unilateral moderate-to-severe VFL (MD < −6 in one eye, MD > −2 in the other eye), bilateral mild VFL (−6 ≤ MD ≤ −2 in both eyes, or −6 ≥ MD ≥ −2 in one eye, MD < −6 in the other eye), bilateral moderate-to-severe VFL (MD < −6 in the both eyes).

§

Analysis of covariance was used to compare adjusted mean scores across the different levels of unilateral and bilateral VFL. The P-value corresponds to the ANCOVA type III sums of squares f-test across the VFL groups. For each row, means with different letters (a–d) across the VFL categories are statistically significantly different from one another after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Tukey-Kramer method (p < 0.05). ANCOVA revealed significant differences across the VFL categories for all VSQOL scales except ocular pain, color vision, and the physical component score of the SF-12.

Composite score is an un-weighted mean of 11 of the 12 NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores (except general health).

Scores could be generated for only 3,808 of the participants who reported that they were currently driving or had driven in the past; the sample size was 2,199, 760, 84, 672, and 93 for the five VFL categories, respectively.

IRT Task Composite was calculated from a graded response model of 13 items from near vision, distance vision, driving, color vision, peripheral vision, and role difficulties subscales.

IRT Well-Being Composite was calculated from a graded response model of 12 items from general vision, dependency on others, mental health, ocular pain, and social functioning subscales.