Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Feb 14;18(4):366.e17–366.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.077

Table 5.

Comparison of BioT Assessed via LC-MS/MS or via Our Prediction Equation for the Total Cohort and From Subsets With Low Total T (≤10.40 nmol/L) or Low BioT (≤2.43 nmol/L)*

N BioT via Prediction Equation, nmol/L Difference vs LC-MS/MS, nmol/L Correlation
Total cohort 194 1.84 ± 0.65 −0.10 ± 0.87, P = .126 r = 0.508, P < .001
Low total T 66 1.40 ± 0.42 −0.21 ± 1.01, P = .089 r = 0.663, P < .001
Low BioT 143 1.69 ± 0.59 0.21 ± 0.52, P < .001 r = 0.673, P < .001
*

Values are reported as means standard deviation in SI units for ease of interpretation, but statistical outcomes were calculated using the natural logarithm of these values. To convert BioT to nanograms per deciliter, multiply value by 28.84.