Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Sep 14;104(1):79–91. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0471-8

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a–d Cortical histomorphometric outcomes at the tibial diaphysis. Values are means ± SEM, n = 8–14/group at each timepoint. Dagger indicates p < 0.05 and ǂ indicates p < 0.01 for SHAM versus SCI at the same timepoint derived from t-tests. No endocortical differences were present among groups, and no double-fluorochrome labeling was present for Ec.MAR or Ec.BFR/BS (not shown). Main effects and interactions derived from the 2 × 4 ANOVAs are reported in Online Resource 4