Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Forum. 2021 Apr 19;56(3):550–559. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12579

Table 4.

Multi-level proportional-odds cumulative logit models testing whether the practice environment moderates the relationship between burnout and quality of care (N = 396)

Beta Coefficient P > |z| 95% Confidence Interval

Model 2 for Professional Visibility Subscale =
Burnout −1.51 0.00 −2.00 −1.02
Professional Visibility 1.51 0.00 1.10 1.93
Interaction Term (Burnout*Professional Visibility) −0.10 0.77 −0.80 0.59
Model 2 for Independent Practice and Support Subscale =
Burnout −1.54 0.00 −2.03 −1.06
Independent Practice and Support 2.03 0.00 1.48 2.57
Interaction Term (Burnout*Independent Practice and Support) −0.005 0.99 −0.92 0.91
Model 2 for NP-Physician Relations Subscale =
Burnout −1.58 0.00 −2.07 −1.10
NP-Physician Relations 1.63 0.00 1.12 2.14
Interaction Term (Burnout*NP-Physician Relations) −0.20 0.63 −1.02 0.62
Model 2 for NP-Administration Relations Subscale =
Burnout −1.39 0.00 −1.90 −0.88
NP-Administration Relations 1.42 0.00 1.04 1.81
Interaction Term (Burnout*NP-Administration Relations) −0.27 0.43 −0.93 0.40

Note. NP = Nurse Practitioner