Table 4.

Regression Analyses Predicting Undergraduates’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Imagined Future Child in Study 2

	b	SE	95% CI	ΔR2	p
Model 1: d′ Positive Implicit Attitudes
Step 1				.02	.64
Secure prime	.04	.13	[−.21, .30]		.73
Anxiety	−.01	.05	[−.12, .10]		.84
Avoidance	−.08	.06	[−.20, .04]		.21
Step 2				.01	.73
Anxiety X Secure prime	.09	.12	[−.15, .32]		.45
Avoidance X Secure prime	−.03	.13	[−.28, .22]		.80
	b	SE	95% CI	ΔR2	p
Model 2: d′ Negative Implicit Attitudes
Step 1				.05	.29
Secure prime	.01	.15	[−.29, .32]		.93
Anxiety	.11	.06	[−.02, .24]		.09
Avoidance	.05	.07	[−.09, .20]		.48
Step 2				.01	.79
Anxiety X Secure prime	.06	.14	[.−.21, .34]		.65
Avoidance X Secure prime	.08	.15	[−.22, .38]		.60
	b	SE	95% CI	ΔR2	p
Model 3: Positive Explicit Attitudes
Step 1				.004	.96
Secure prime	.03	.17	[−.31, .36]		.88
Anxiety	.04	.07	[−.11, .18]		.63
Avoidance	.01	.08	[−.15, .17]		.88
Step 2				.01	.77
Anxiety X Secure prime	.04	.16	[−.27, .35]		.81
Avoidance X Secure prime	−.11	.17	[−.44, .22]		.50
	b	SE	95% CI	ΔR2	p
Model 4: Negative Explicit Attitudes
Step 1				.03	.44
Secure prime	−.05	.17	[−.39, .30]		.79
Anxiety	−.04	.07	[−.18, .11]		.61
Avoidance	−.12	.08	[−.28, .05]		.16
Step 2				.002	.93
Anxiety X Secure prime	.05	.16	[−.27, .37]		.77
Avoidance X Secure prime	.05	.17	[−.30, .39]		.79

Note. Positive implicit attitudes reflect residualized scores after adjusting for negative implicit attitudes. Negative implicit attitudes reflect residualized scores after adjusting for positive implicit attitudes.