Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 3;12(4):921–932. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12737

Table 2.

Comparison of mean characteristics between older subjects with and without mobility limitations

Well‐functioning older subjects Mobility‐limited older subjects P value a
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Women (n [%]) 5032 [81.7] 1129 [18.3]
Age (years) 72.0 ± 6.0 80.4 ± 7.3 <0.001
Body mass (kg) 68.1 ± 11.1 66.6 ± 12.6 0.465
Height (m) 1.55 ± 0.07 1.52 ± 0.07 <0.001
BMI (kg·m−2) 28.3 ± 4.5 28.8 ± 5.0 <0.001
30 s STS test (reps) 14.6 ± 3.9 9.2 ± 4.4 <0.001
Men (n [%]) 2649 [83.9] 510 [16.1]
Age (years) 71.8 ± 6.4 80.7 ± 7.6 <0.001
Body mass (kg) 77.0 ± 12.4 73.0 ± 13.8 <0.001
Height (m) 1.67 ± 0.09 1.62 ± 0.09 <0.001
BMI (kg·m−2) 27.5 ± 3.6 27.8 ± 4.6 0.360
30 s STS test (reps) 15.6 ± 4.2 9.6 ± 4.2 <0.001

BMI, body mass index; reps, number of repetitions; SD, standard deviation; STS, sit‐to‐stand.

Bold values indicate significant differences between older subjects with and without mobility limitations.

a

Adjusted for study cohort.