Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;12(4):891–899. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12713

Table 5.

Relationships between Barthel Index efficiency and other variables (n = 404)

Variables B SE 95% confidence interval of B β VIF P‐value
Quadriceps echo intensity −0.00 0.00 −0.01, −0.00 −0.21 2.23 <0.01
Quadriceps thickness 0.03 0.06 −0.09, 0.14 0.03 2.57 0.67
Subcutaneous fat thickness of the thigh −0.04 0.09 −0.22, 0.13 −0.03 1.47 0.64
Barthel Index score at admission −0.00 0.00 −0.00, −0.00 −0.16 1.65 <0.01
Age 0.00 0.00 −0.01, 0.01 0.01 1.27 0.86
Sex −0.08 0.04 −0.15, −0.00 −0.10 1.19 0.04
Number of medications −0.01 0.01 −0.02, −0.00 −0.11 1.12 0.04
C‐reactive protein −0.01 0.01 −0.02, 0.01 −0.05 1.16 0.29
Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index score −0.03 0.01 −0.04, −0.01 −0.16 1.12 <0.01
Food Intake Level Scale 0.03 0.01 0.01, 0.05 0.14 1.53 0.02
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index score 0.00 0.00 −0.00, 0.01 0.03 1.83 0.69
Days from onset disease −0.00 0.00 −0.00, 0.00 −0.11 1.14 0.03
Number of rehabilitation therapy 0.01 0.01 −0.01, 0.04 0.06 1.18 0.22

B, partial regression coefficient; SE, standard error; VIF, variance inflation factor; β, standardized partial regression coefficient.