Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;9:682143. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.682143

TABLE 1.

Clinical application of cellular therapy using human oral mucosa cells to regenerate oral tissues or other recipient tissues.

Intra-oral

Cell type Method Donor tissue Recipient tissue Outcome Reference(s)
Keratinocytes
Inline graphic
TEOM
Inline graphic
Hard palate Tongue (intra-oral wound) Improved tissue adhesion, speech and tongue mobility Lauer and Schimming, 2001
Keratinised oral mucosa on human dermis (AlloDerm®) Tongue, alveolar gingiva, buccal mucosa, floor of mouth and Oropharyngeal mucosa No postoperative pain, excellent adhesiveness and good epithelial coverage Izumi et al., 2003
Gingiva keratinocytes on human dermis (AlloDerm®) Tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa and alveolar ridge Faster healing, negligible scar contracture Hotta et al., 2007
Hard palate keratinocytes on human dermis (AlloDerm®) Gingiva Good adhesiveness, increased gingival tissue Izumi et al., 2013

Keratinocytes and fibroblasts
Inline graphic
TEOM
Inline graphic
Buccal mucosa Tongue Good mobility of tongue, satisfactory speech, residual fibrosis Llames et al., 2014
Palatal mucosa Fibula flaps for maxillary and mandibular reconstruction Granulation tissue formation in one patient, good restoring outcome Gil et al., 2015

Fat pad
Inline graphic
Grafting
Inline graphic
Buccal fat Posterior alveolus and hard palate Full recovery Egyedi, 1977
Buccal fat Mid-palatal and posterior palatal fistulas Full recovery Ashtiani et al., 2011
Buccal fat Palatal fistulas Full recovery Yaguchi et al., 2021

Fibroblasts
Inline graphic
Injection
Inline graphic
Gingiva Gingiva Test treatment improved papillary tissue augmentation McGuire and Scheyer, 2007
Scaffold
Inline graphic
Gingiva Gingiva Increased gingival width, keratinised epithelium supported by dense connective tissue Mohammadi et al., 2011
Gingiva Gingiva Efficient gingival augmentation Dominiak et al., 2012

Extra-oral

Epithelial flap TEOM
Inline graphic
Buccal mucosa Trachea Faster healing, buccal mucosa and fascia form an optimised tissue combination Delaere et al., 2001

Keratinocytes
Inline graphic
TEOM
Inline graphic
Buccal mucosa Eye Vision restored, no complications Nishida et al., 2004
Lip Skin (scalp) 30% success of engraftment due to local infection Iida et al., 2005
Buccal mucosa Oesophagus Effective re-epithelialisation, no dysphagia or stricture formation Ohki et al., 2012
Buccal mucosa Oesophagus Safe, reduced risk for post-ESD stricture formation Jonas et al., 2016
Buccal mucosa Oesophagus Short post-ESD ulcer healing period, successful cell sheet fabrication, transport and transplantation. Yamaguchi et al., 2017

Lingual tissue Grafting
Inline graphic
Ventrolateral tongue Urethra Good success rates of reconstruction of short strictures, combination with buccal mucosa for longer grafts Simonato et al., 2008

Buccal mucosal cells TEOM
Inline graphic
Buccal mucosa Urethra Safe and effective anterior urethroplasty Barbagli et al., 2018

Comparison of the outcomes according to the tissue of origin, the therapeutic method used and the recipient tissue. TEOM, tissue-engineered oral mucosa; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.