Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;11(7):1076–1082. doi: 10.1177/2192568220941456

Table 3.

High Percent Cobb Correction Versus Low Percent Cobb Correction: Zonal Implant Density (ID) and Cobb Correction.

Zone High percent Cobb correction ID (>67% Cobb correction) Low percent Cobb Correction ID (<67% Cobb correction) P
Total construct 1.67 1.44 <.001
Total concave side 95.9% 85.8% .003
Total convex side 71.7% 57.8% .001
Apical convex 78.7% 60.4% .007
Apical concave 95.8% 88.5% .12
Periapical concave 95.4% 82% .02
Periapical convex 58.2% 37.7% .01
Cephalad concave 93.1% 78.1% .007
Cephalad convex 66.6% 64.0% .64
Caudad concave 98.6% 93.7% .14
Caudad convex 81.9% 75.0% .25