Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 9;8:49. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00345-7

Table 2.

Incident characteristics* by homicide type, National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003–2017**

         Incidents
Mass homicide
n(%)
Multiple homicide
n(%)
Single homicide
n(%)
Chi-square p-value
Total 141 3,439 74,623
Location of Incident
 Private home/apartment 95 (67.4) b 2,019 (58.7) c 35,113 (47.1) < 0.001
 Public location 29 (20.6) a,b 1,033 (30.0) c 35,171 (47.1) < 0.001
 More than one location 16 (11.4) b 328 (9.5) c < 0.001
 Unknown 1 (0.7) b 59 (1.7) c 4,339 (5.8) < 0.001
Primary weapon used to inflict fatal injuries
 Firearm 104 (74.3) a 2,810 (82.3) c 49,509 (69.2) < 0.001
 Other 36 (25.7) a 604 (17.7) c 22,062 (30.8) < 0.001
Number of weapons used to inflict fatal injuries
 1 120 (85.7) a,b 3,208 (93.5) c 72,460 (99.6) < 0.001
 2 17 (12.1) a,b 210 (6 1) c 313 (0.4) < 0.001
 3+ 3 (2.1) b 14 (0.4) c 0 (0) < 0.001
One or more nonfatally shot 30 (21.3) b 561 (16.3) c 6,008 (8.1) < 0.001
Number nonfatally shot
 0 107 (75.9) b 2,774 (80.7) c 62,525 (83.8) < 0.001
 1 14 (9.9) 398 (11.6) c 4,695 (6.3) < 0.001
 2 5 (3.6) 95 (2.8) c 920 (1.2) < 0.001
 3+ 11 (7. 8) a,b 68 (2.0) c 393 (0.5) < 0.001
 Unknown 4 (2. 8) 104 (3.0) c 6,090 (8.2) < 0.001
Perpetrated by more than one suspect*** 23 (18.3) 563 (20.0) c 9,106 (16.4) < 0.001
Circumstances d
Interpersonal violence/life stressor
  Intimate partner violence-related 41 (34.5) a,b 622 (21.9) c 9,637 (17.4) < 0.001
  Family relationship problem e 18 (28.1) a,b 184 (12.0) c 1,480 (5.2) < 0.001
  Crisis during previous or upcoming 2 weeks f 24 (27.3) a,b 354 (16.7) c 3,760 (9.4) < 0.001
  Argument or conflict 31 (26.1) b 947 (33.3) c 22,757 (41.1) < 0.001
  Perpetrator of interpersonal violence in past month f 13 (14.8) b 202 (9.5) c 1,697 (4.2) < 0.001
  Other relationship problem (non-intimate or family) e 4 (6.3) 90 (5.9) 1,473 (5.2) 0.46
  Victim of interpersonal violence in past month f 3 (3.4) 54 (2.6) 996 (2.5) 0.84
  Jealousy (lovers’ triangle) 3 (2.5) 159 (5.6) c 2,001 (3.6) < 0.001
  Physical fight (2 people, not a brawl) e 1 (1.6) b 90 (5.9) c 4,006 (14.0) < 0.001
  Brawl 1 (0 8) 56 (2.0) 1,223 (2.2) 0.42
Crime-related
  Drug involvement 15 (12.6) 513 (18.0) c 7,175 (13.0) < 0.001
  Gang-related 7 (5.9) 235 (8.3) c 3,790 (6.8) 0.01
  Drive-by shooting 3 (2.5) 151 (5.3) 2,883 (5.2) 0.41
  Hate crime 2 (1.7) b 10 (0.4) c 73 (0.13) < 0.001
  Terrorist attack 2 (1.7) b 4 (0.1) c 6 (0.01) < 0.001
  Walk by assault e 0 (0) 64 (4.2) c 1,632 (5.7) 0.01
Other
  Victim(s) killed at work 12 (10.1) a,b 120 (4.2) c 1,580 (2.9) < 0.001
  Random violence f, **** 7 (8.0) b 77 (3.6) c 861 (2.1) < 0.001
  Victim used a weapon 6 (5.0) 257 (9.0) c 3,209 (5.8) < 0.001
  Victim was a bystander 6 (5.0) b 171 (6.0) c 973 (1.8) < 0.001
  Justifiable self defense 5 (4.2) 87 (3.1) 1,584 (2.9) 0.56

* To consolidate information about incidents with > 1 homicide, the authors developed an incident-level dataset with one record per incident (1 or more homicide victims) to describe all victims and suspects in the incident. This avoids overrepresenting data such as incident circumstances and suspect demographics associated with multi-victim homicides by counting these characteristics once per incident instead of once per victim

**All 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico are currently funded to participate in NVDRS, but at the time of this study several of the newer states/jurisdictions had not yet completed a data collection cycle and therefore are not included. States and jurisdictions were first funded to participate in NVDRS in different years. Data for this study comes from the following 37 states/jurisdictions: Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, South Carolina, and Virginia (2003–2017); Alaska, Colorado, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin (2004–2017); Kentucky, New Mexico, and Utah (2005–2017); Ohio (2010–2017); Michigan (2014–2017); Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington (2015–2017); Hawaii (2015–2016); California, Delaware, West Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (2017). Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Washington collected data on ≥80% of violent deaths in their state, in accordance with requirements under which these states were funded. Data for California are for violent deaths that occurred in four counties (Los Angeles, Sacramento, Shasta, and Siskiyou)

*** Percentages are based on the number of incidents with known suspect information: mass (126), multiple (2,826), single (55,468). The sum of percentages in columns may exceed 100% because more than one circumstance could have been present per incident

****Random violence is defined as an act in which the suspect is not concerned with who is being harmed, just that someone is being harmed. An example of random violence is an incident in which a person who shoots randomly at passing cars from a highway bridge or opens fire in a crowded shopping mall

aStatistically significant difference (p < .05) of the prevalence between mass versus multiple homicide

bStatistically significant difference (p < .05) of the prevalence between mass versus single-victim homicide

cStatistically significant difference (p < .05) of the prevalence between multiple versus single-victim homicide

dUnless otherwise specified, percentages are based on incidents with known circumstances: Mass = 119; Multiple = 2,843; Single = 55,416

eCircumstances introduced in 2013; denominator adjusted to include only years 2013–2017

fCircumstances introduced in 2009; denominator adjusted to include only years 2009–2017