Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Aug 9;83(4):e9–e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.012

Serological markers of SARS-CoV-2 infection; anti-nucleocapsid antibody positivity may not be the ideal marker of natural infection in vaccinated individuals

Niamh Allen a,, Melissa Brady b,c, Antonio Isidro Carrion Martin d, Lisa Domegan c, Cathal Walsh c,e,f, Lorraine Doherty c, Una Ni Riain g, Colm Bergin a, Catherine Fleming h, Niall Conlon i
PMCID: PMC8351117  PMID: 34384812

Dear Editor,

We write in response to correspondence from Whitaker et al. in this Journal (1). The authors demonstrate increases in seropositivity for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the spike protein as the roll out of COVID-19 vaccines continues, whilst parallel assessment of nucleocapsid antibodies remained stable. This study is an example of the use of parallel assessment of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) antibodies to discriminate between natural infection and vaccine related seropositivity (2) (3). This approach remains attractive, but as the pandemic rolls on it is worth considering the paucity of evidence about the impact of vaccination on antibody production in response to a subsequent natural infection.

As part of a large seroprevalence study in hospital healthcare workers (PRECISE 2 (4)), we measured antibody response following vaccination in over 4000 hospital healthcare workers (HCW), coupled with a questionnaire about previous symptoms and confirmed infection. We measured anti-S and anti-N antibodies using Roche Elecsys total antibody assays to determine both serological response to vaccination and to natural infection. Twenty-three participants reported a breakthrough infection post-vaccination, defined as PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥14 days after completion of vaccination (5). This represented 0.6% (23/4111) of all fully vaccinated participants in the study. All had received Pfizer vaccine (which was the vaccine received by most study participants). For these 23 participants, the median number of days between second vaccine dose and positive PCR was 30 days (IQR 25–50 days). Five (22%) had symptoms at the time of the positive PCR test and 18 (78%) did not have symptoms (they were tested as close contacts or as part of hospital outbreaks). All 23 participants had detectable anti-S antibodies, as expected post vaccination (6). Notably, only 6/23 (26%, 95%CI: 11–49) had detectable anti-N antibodies in response to their infection, compared to 663/812 (82%, 95%CI: 79–84, p-value= <0.001 (Chi-squared) of all participants in the study with previous PCR-confirmed infection having detectable anti-N antibodies. Of the 17 that were anti-N negative, median number of days between PCR positivity and sampling mid-point was 52 (range 9–67) so it is surprising that the majority of these had not mounted an anti-N antibody response (7). This low number of seroconversions might suggest that anti-N antibodies may be insensitive as a marker of natural infection post vaccination. It is possible that early viral neutralisation, perhaps even at mucosal surfaces, might modify the natural humoral response and limit the development of anti-N antibodies.

There are a very limited number of studies evaluating the production of anti-N post infection in vaccinated individuals; Demmer et al., in a study awaiting peer-review, have commented on high sensitivity and specificity of anti-N antibody assays in detecting infection in vaccinated individuals (8), however the infection in these individuals pre-dated their vaccination. Studies such as that conducted by Whittaker et al. that we are here responding to, are continuing to rely on anti-N as a marker of seropositivity related to natural infection, including in vaccinated individuals (1). Vaccine effectiveness studies will also incorporate periodic serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as a marker of breakthrough infection (9). To the best of our knowledge there are no published data to date that have identified a comparative reduction in anti-N seroconversion following natural infection in vaccinated individuals. Whilst our numbers are small, even in large seroprevalence studies numbers of breakthrough infections will be small (5), and further research of individuals with well-defined vaccine breakthrough infections are required. This information will be critical in informing optimal assessment of seroprevalence in vaccinated cohorts.

References

  • 1.Whitaker H.J., Elgohari S., Rowe C., Otter A.D., Brooks T., Linley E. Impact of COVID-19 vaccination program on seroprevalence in blood donors in England, 2021. J Infect. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.037. S0163445321002243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Okba N.M.A., Müller M.A., Li W., Wang C., GeurtsvanKessel C.H., Corman V.M. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2−Specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):1478–1488. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dörschug A., Frickmann H., Schwanbeck J., Yilmaz E., Mese K., Hahn A. Comparative assessment of sera from individuals after S-Gene RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with spike-protein-based and nucleocapsid-based serological assays. Diagnostics. 2021;11(3):426. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 natural infection and post-vaccination in Irish Hospital Healthcare Workers (PRECISE 2) [Internet]. Health Protection Surveillance Centre of Ireland (HPSC); 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/research/precise/PRECISE%202%20Report.pdf
  • 5.CDC morbidity and mortality weekly report (MMWR) - interim estimates of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers — Eight U.S. locations, December 2020–March 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Eyre D.W., Lumley S.F., Wei J., Cox S., James T., Justice A. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike responses to Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines by previous infection status. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.041. S1198743X21002895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Algaissi A., Alfaleh M.A., Hala S., Abujamel T.S., Alamri S.S., Almahboub S.A. SARS-CoV-2 S1 and N-based serological assays reveal rapid seroconversion and induction of specific antibody response in COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73491-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Demmer R.T., Baumgartner B., Wiggen T.D., Ulrich A.K., Strickland A.J., Naumchik B.M. Identification of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in seroprevalence studies among vaccinated populations [Internet] Infect Dis (except HIV/AIDS) 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.02.002. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.04.12.21255330 [cited 2021 Jul 8]. Available from. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organisation; evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccine_effectiveness-measurement-2021.1

Articles from The Journal of Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES