Table 3.
ΔcPWV | ΔcPWVcorr | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
β (95% CI) (m/s/mm Hg) |
P value |
β (95% CI) (m/s/mm Hg) |
P value | |
Crude | 0.023 (0.000; 0.045) | 0.047 | −0.018 (−0.040; 0.003) | 0.091 |
Model 2 | 0.027 (0.005; 0.050) | 0.019 | −0.018 (−0.039; 0.004) | 0.105 |
Model 3 | 0.026 (0.002; 0.050) | 0.035 | −0.019 (−0.042; 0.004) | 0.104 |
ΔE | ΔEcorr | |||
Crude | 0.007 (0.003; 0.012) | 0.001 | −0.001 (−0.005; 0.002) | 0.446 |
Model 2 | 0.007 (0.003; 0.011) | 0.001 | −0.002 (−0.005; 0.002) | 0.398 |
Model 3 | 0.007 (0.002; 0.012) | 0.003 | −0.002 (−0.006; 0.002) | 0.350 |
Abbreviations: Δ denotes β, unstandardized regression coefficient; BMI, body mass index; CI, 95% confidence interval; cPWV, carotid pulse wave velocity; cPWVcorr, pressure-corrected cPWV according to equation (S1); E, Young’s modulus; Ecorr, pressure-corrected Young’s modulus according to equation (S6); MAP, mean arterial pressure. For ΔcPWV model 2: crude model + ΔIMT, ΔHR, use of antihypertensive drugs at the first visit. Model 3: model 2 + age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, diabetes status, and hypercholesterolemia. For ΔE model 2: crude model + ΔHR and use of antihypertensive drugs at the first visit. Model 3: model 2 + age, sex, smoking status, BMI, diabetes status, and hypercholesterolemia. In models 2 and 3 for ΔcPWV the change in intima–media thickness ΔIMT was used. Correspondingly, in the models for ΔcPWVcorr the pressure-corrected ΔIMTcorr was used.