Table 1.

Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test of the insertion torque values collected data for each group in the two block models used

Group comparison	PCF 10		PCF 20
	95% CI of diff.	P value	95% CI of diff.	P value
DCs1 vs. DCs2	−4.156 to −1.084	0.0011*	−24.55 to −20.61	0.0002*
DCs1 vs. DCs3	−4.796 to −1.724	0.0010*	−28.67 to −24.73	0.0002*
DCs2 vs. DCs3	−2.176 to 0.8957	0.3443	−6.093 to −2.147	0.0003*
Ms1 vs. Ms2	−2.966 to −0.8737	0.0013*	−21.87 to −19.35	<0.0001*
Ms1 vs. Ms3	−2.686 to −0.5937	0.0032*	−24.98 to −22.46	<0.0001*
Ms2 vs. Ms3	−0.7663 to 1.326	0.4027	−4.366 to −1.854	0.0002*
DCs1 vs. Ms1	−1.181 to 1.981	0.1974	1.630 to 5.610	0.0004*
DCs2 vs. Ms2	−0.4811 to 2.681	0.0101*	3.600 to 7.580	0.0003*
DCs3 vs. Ms3	0.4389 to 3.601	0.0170*	4.610 to 8.590	0.0002*

CI = confidence interval, DC = Duo Cone, diff. = difference, M = Maestro, PCF = pounds per cubic foot, s1 = sequence 1, s2 = sequence 2, s3 = sequence 3

*Statistically different