Table 2.

Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test of the implant stability quotient values collected data for each group in the two block models used

Group comparison	PCF 10		PCF 20
	95% CI of diff.	P value	95% CI of diff.	P value
DCs1 vs. DCs2	−8.971 to −1.829	0.0012*	−8.813 to −3.587	0.0002*
DCs1 vs. DCs3	−16.47 to −9.329	0.0002*	−11.81 to −6.587	0.0002*
DCs2 vs. DCs3	−11.07 to −3.929	0.0002*	−5.613 to −0.3872	0.0060*
Ms1 vs. Ms2	−10.37 to −3.229	0.0002*	−9.013 to −3.787	0.0002*
Ms1 vs. Ms3	−10.37 to −3.229	0.0002*	−12.91 to −7.687	0.0002*
Ms2 vs. Ms3	−10.37 to −3.229	0.0003*	−6.513 to −1.287	0.0007*
DCs1 vs. Ms1	−1.181 to 1.981	0.2884	−1.913 to 3.313	0.7296
DCs2 vs. Ms2	−0.4811 to 2.681	0.9688	−2.113 to 3.113	0.4137
DCs3 vs. Ms3	0.4389 to 3.601	0.7886	−3.013 to 2.213	0.9683

CI = confidence interval, DC = Duo Cone, diff. = difference, M = Maestro, PCF = pounds per cubic foot, s1 = sequence 1, s2 = sequence 2, s3 = sequence 3

*Statistically different