Table 3.
Group comparison | PCF 10 | PCF 20 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
95% CI of diff. | P value | 95% CI of diff. | P value | |
DCs1 vs. DCs2 | −10.43 to −3.934 | 0.0001* | −92.83 to −71.73 | <0.0001* |
DCs1 vs. DCs3 | −33.63 to −27.13 | <0.0001* | −142.5 to −121.5 | <0.0001* |
DCs2 vs. DCs3 | −26.45 to −19.95 | <0.0001* | −60.27 to −39.17 | <0.0001* |
Ms1 vs. Ms2 | −20.25 to −13.75 | 0.0002* | −108.1 to −86.99 | <0.0001* |
Ms1 vs. Ms3 | −32.85 to −26.35 | 0.0002* | −146.5 to −125.4 | 0.0002* |
Ms2 vs. Ms3 | −32.85 to −26.35 | <0.0001* | −48.97 to −27.87 | <0.0001* |
DCs1 vs. Ms1 | −4.326 to 2.166 | 0.2890 | −4.947 to 16.15 | 0.2799 |
DCs2 vs. Ms2 | −14.15 to −7.654 | <0.0001* | −20.21 to 0.8872 | 0.0820 |
DCs3 vs. Ms3 | −3.546 to 2.946 | 0.7047 | −8.907 to 12.19 | 0.4488 |
CI = confidence interval, DC = Duo Cone, diff. = difference, M = Maestro, PCF = pounds per cubic foot, s1 = sequence 1, s2 = sequence 2, s3 = sequence 3
*Statistically different