Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;11(4):437–447. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_96_21

Table 3.

Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test of the pullout force values for each group in the two block models used

Group comparison PCF 10 PCF 20
95% CI of diff. P value 95% CI of diff. P value
DCs1 vs. DCs2 −10.43 to −3.934 0.0001* −92.83 to −71.73 <0.0001*
DCs1 vs. DCs3 −33.63 to −27.13 <0.0001* −142.5 to −121.5 <0.0001*
DCs2 vs. DCs3 −26.45 to −19.95 <0.0001* −60.27 to −39.17 <0.0001*
Ms1 vs. Ms2 −20.25 to −13.75 0.0002* −108.1 to −86.99 <0.0001*
Ms1 vs. Ms3 −32.85 to −26.35 0.0002* −146.5 to −125.4 0.0002*
Ms2 vs. Ms3 −32.85 to −26.35 <0.0001* −48.97 to −27.87 <0.0001*
DCs1 vs. Ms1 −4.326 to 2.166 0.2890 −4.947 to 16.15 0.2799
DCs2 vs. Ms2 −14.15 to −7.654 <0.0001* −20.21 to 0.8872 0.0820
DCs3 vs. Ms3 −3.546 to 2.946 0.7047 −8.907 to 12.19 0.4488

CI = confidence interval, DC = Duo Cone, diff. = difference, M = Maestro, PCF = pounds per cubic foot, s1 = sequence 1, s2 = sequence 2, s3 = sequence 3

*Statistically different