TABLE 3.
Comparison of participant knowledge scores before and after animation viewing
Knowledge score (IQR, 1–8) | Pretest, mean ± SD | Posttest, mean ± SD | Change, % | z score | Effect size (R)a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total cohort (n = 24) | 5.7 ± 2.0 | 7.0 ± 1.4 | 23 | 3.34 | 0.48 |
Black race (n = 8) | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 38 | 2.41 | 0.60 |
Non-Black race (n = 16) | 6.1 ± 2.1 | 7.2 ± 1.5 | 18 | 2.39 | 0.42 |
Education, less than college (n = 11) | 5.6 ± 2.0 | 7.2 ± 0.9 | 29 | 2.39 | 0.51 |
Education, college level (n = 13) | 5.8 ± 2.0 | 6.9 ± 1.7 | 19 | 2.39 | 0.47 |
<Median literacy/numeracy (n = 10)b | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 7.1 ± 1.0 | 31 | 2.23 | 0.50 |
≥Median literacy/numeracy (n = 14) | 5.9 ± 1.7 | 6.9 ± 1.6 | 17 | 2.55 | 0.48 |
Age ≥60 y (n = 9) | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 6.4 ± 1.9 | 39 | 2.23 | 0.53 |
Age <60 y (n = 15) | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | 16 | 2.55 | 0.47 |
Income ≤$50 000 (n = 9) | 5.0 ± 2.6 | 6.7 ± 1.9 | 34 | 2.04 | 0.48 |
Income >$50 000 (n = 11) | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 7.0 ± 1.0 | 21 | 2.41 | 0.51 |
Transplant candidate (n = 12) | 4.8 ± 2.1 | 6.5 ± 1.7 | 35 | 2.41 | 0.49 |
Potential live kidney donor (n = 12) | 6.6 ± 1.4 | 7.5 ± 0.8 | 14 | 2.41 | 0.49 |
<Median technology access (n = 5)c | 5.6 ± 3.1 | 7.6 ± 0.5 | 36 | 1.34 | 0.42 |
≥Median technology access (n = 19) | 5.7 ± 1.7 | 6.8 ± 1.5 | 19 | 3.12 | 0.51 |
aEffect size, interpretation: 0.10 = small effect, 0.24 = medium effect, and 0.37 = large effect.
bLow health literacy/numeracy was defined as a score <10 on the summed score of 4 items.
cLow technology access was defined as a score <6 on the summed score of 6 items.
IQR, interquartile range.