Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 6;7(9):e744. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001194

TABLE 3.

Comparison of participant knowledge scores before and after animation viewing

Knowledge score (IQR, 1–8) Pretest, mean ± SD Posttest, mean ± SD Change, % z score Effect size (R)a
Total cohort (n = 24) 5.7 ± 2.0 7.0 ± 1.4 23 3.34 0.48
Black race (n = 8) 4.8 ± 1.3 6.6 ± 1.1 38 2.41 0.60
Non-Black race (n = 16) 6.1 ± 2.1 7.2 ± 1.5 18 2.39 0.42
Education, less than college (n = 11) 5.6 ± 2.0 7.2 ± 0.9 29 2.39 0.51
Education, college level (n = 13) 5.8 ± 2.0 6.9 ± 1.7 19 2.39 0.47
<Median literacy/numeracy (n = 10)b 5.4 ± 2.3 7.1 ± 1.0 31 2.23 0.50
≥Median literacy/numeracy (n = 14) 5.9 ± 1.7 6.9 ± 1.6 17 2.55 0.48
Age ≥60 y (n = 9) 4.6 ± 2.3 6.4 ± 1.9 39 2.23 0.53
Age <60 y (n = 15) 6.3 ± 1.5 7.3 ± 0.8 16 2.55 0.47
Income ≤$50 000 (n = 9) 5.0 ± 2.6 6.7 ± 1.9 34 2.04 0.48
Income >$50 000 (n = 11) 5.8 ± 1.5 7.0 ± 1.0 21 2.41 0.51
Transplant candidate (n = 12) 4.8 ± 2.1 6.5 ± 1.7 35 2.41 0.49
Potential live kidney donor (n = 12) 6.6 ± 1.4 7.5 ± 0.8 14 2.41 0.49
<Median technology access (n = 5)c 5.6 ± 3.1 7.6 ± 0.5 36 1.34 0.42
≥Median technology access (n = 19) 5.7 ± 1.7 6.8 ± 1.5 19 3.12 0.51

aEffect size, interpretation: 0.10 = small effect, 0.24 = medium effect, and 0.37 = large effect.

bLow health literacy/numeracy was defined as a score <10 on the summed score of 4 items.

cLow technology access was defined as a score <6 on the summed score of 6 items.

IQR, interquartile range.