TABLE II.
Selected Commentary from Candidate Respondents
| Candidate Commentary |
|---|
| Pro in-person • Top candidates are able to undergo significantly more interviews since they do not have to travel. • The lower tier applicants received less opportunities. • Something to prevent hoarding (should be done). It is unfair that a top 5 program for me would rather interview someone who will not even rank them. • After being sent home from clinical rotations for 2 months, I decided to apply to a back-up program other than orthopaedics. I couldn't imagine the thought of not matching/sitting at home for a year. • Interviewed at same program virtually and in-person. More awkward virtually for that program. • The biggest con is the inability to meet the residents and faculty in-person and get a literal feel. • Virtual socials (“meet and greets”) seem minimally effective from an applicant perspective. • I think programs are going to have more positions unfilled. Neutral • Should be optional for applicants going forward (have a virtual interview day option) to save money. • There are definitely pros and cons to the virtual interview format Pro virtual • I felt the virtual rotations provided insight to candidates about a given program. • I think virtual interviews offer a lot of benefits that I believe will continue even after the pandemic. • I would implore the leadership to keep interviews virtual in subsequent years. A strong application cap would limit the total number of applications crossing the desks of selection committees. |