Table 2.
Image similarity measures achieved for the selected sample mages.
| Image | Method | TPR | FNR | TNR | FPR | Jaccard | Dice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image 1 | Otsu | 0.8035 | 0.1965 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.8032 | 0.8909 |
| Kapur | 0.1348 | 0.8652 | 0.9999 | 0.0001 | 0.1345 | 0.2372 | |
| Shannon | 0.8804 | 0.1196 | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 0.8201 | 0.9012 | |
| Tsallis | 0.8800 | 0.1200 | 0.9996 | 0.0004 | 0.8518 | 0.9200 | |
| Image 2 | Shannon | 0.7907 | 0.2093 | 0.9992 | 0.0008 | 0.7454 | 0.8541 |
| Tsallis | 0.8339 | 0.1661 | 0.9996 | 0.0004 | 0.8078 | 0.8937 | |
| Image 3 | Shannon | 0.8405 | 0.1595 | 0.9993 | 0.0007 | 0.7841 | 0.8790 |
| Tsallis | 0.4450 | 0.1555 | 0.9993 | 0.0007 | 0.7876 | 0.8812 | |
| Image 4 | Shannon | 0.8912 | 0.1088 | 0.9991 | 0.0009 | 0.8281 | 0.9060 |
| Tsallis | 0.8482 | 0.1581 | 0.9988 | 0.0012 | 0.7750 | 0.8732 | |
| Image 5 | Shannon | 0.8535 | 0.1465 | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.8270 | 0.9053 |
| Tsallis | 0.8261 | 0.1739 | 0.9995 | 0.0005 | 0.7705 | 0.8704 | |
| Image 6 | Shannon | 0.9133 | 0.9986 | 0.0014 | 0.0867 | 0.8019 | 0.8901 |
| Tsallis | 0.8396 | 0.1604 | 0.9998 | 0.0002 | 0.8263 | 0.9049 |