Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 1;2021:5524637. doi: 10.1155/2021/5524637

Table 2.

Image similarity measures achieved for the selected sample mages.

Image Method TPR FNR TNR FPR Jaccard Dice
Image 1 Otsu 0.8035 0.1965 1.0000 0.0000 0.8032 0.8909
Kapur 0.1348 0.8652 0.9999 0.0001 0.1345 0.2372
Shannon 0.8804 0.1196 0.9992 0.0008 0.8201 0.9012
Tsallis 0.8800 0.1200 0.9996 0.0004 0.8518 0.9200
Image 2 Shannon 0.7907 0.2093 0.9992 0.0008 0.7454 0.8541
Tsallis 0.8339 0.1661 0.9996 0.0004 0.8078 0.8937
Image 3 Shannon 0.8405 0.1595 0.9993 0.0007 0.7841 0.8790
Tsallis 0.4450 0.1555 0.9993 0.0007 0.7876 0.8812
Image 4 Shannon 0.8912 0.1088 0.9991 0.0009 0.8281 0.9060
Tsallis 0.8482 0.1581 0.9988 0.0012 0.7750 0.8732
Image 5 Shannon 0.8535 0.1465 0.9998 0.0002 0.8270 0.9053
Tsallis 0.8261 0.1739 0.9995 0.0005 0.7705 0.8704
Image 6 Shannon 0.9133 0.9986 0.0014 0.0867 0.8019 0.8901
Tsallis 0.8396 0.1604 0.9998 0.0002 0.8263 0.9049