Skip to main content
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology : JGC logoLink to Journal of Geriatric Cardiology : JGC
. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):523–533. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.07.003

Prevalence and modifiable risk factors of degenerative valvular heart disease among elderly population in southern China

Shang-Fei HE 1,2, Jun-Rong JIANG 1,2, Fang-Zhou LIU 2, Hong-Tao LIAO 2, Yu-Mei XUE 2, Mu-Rui ZHENG 3, Huo-Xing LI 2, Hai DENG 2,4,*, Shu-Lin WU 2,*
PMCID: PMC8352778  PMID: 34404989

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the prevalence and modifiable risk factors of degenerative valvular heart disease (DVHD) among elderly population in southern China.

Methods

A stratified multistage sampling method was used to recruit subjects. The contents of the survey included the questionnaire, laboratory examination, echocardiography, and other auxiliary examinations. The possible risk factors of DVHD were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 3538 subjects ≥ 65 years of age were enrolled. One thousand three hundred and seven subjects (36.9%) were diagnosed with DVHD. Degenerative was the most common etiology of VHD. Prevalence of DVHD increased with advancing age. The prevalence of DVHD differed by living region (χ2 = 45.594, P < 0.001), educational level ( χ2 = 50.557, P < 0.001), and occupation ( χ2 = 36.961, P < 0.001). Risk factors associated with DVHD included age (two-fold increased risk for each 10-year increase in age), elevated level C-reactive protein (OR = 1.346, 95% CI: 1.100−1.646), elevated level low density lipoprotein (OR = 1.243, 95% CI: 1.064−1.451), coronary artery disease (OR = 1.651, 95% CI: 1.085−2.513), smoking (OR = 1.341, 95% CI: 1.132−1.589), and hypertension (OR = 1.414, 95% CI: 1.221−1.638). Other significant risk factors included reduced or elevated level red blood cell (OR = 1.347, 95% CI: 1.031−1.761; OR = 1.599, 95% CI: 1.097−2.331; respectively), elevated level platelets (OR = 1.891, 95% CI: 1.118−3.198), elevated level uric acid (OR = 1.282, 95% CI: 1.112−1.479), and stroke (OR: 1.738, 95% CI = 1.085−2.513).

Conclusions

The survey characterized the baseline conditions of DVHD cohort of elderly population in Guangzhou city. The established and emerging risk factors for DVHD may represent challenges and opportunities for therapy.


Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a common condition that is strongly associated with heart dysfunction in elderly population.[1] In developed countries, the etiology of VHD has changed in parallel with socio-economic development and an increasing aging population. In the Euro Heart Survey, etiology of VHD was mostly degenerative, which is present in approximately 63% of patients.[2] In developing countries, rheumatic heart disease remains the primary cause of VHD.[3] A retrospective hospital-based survey in China suggested that rheumatic fever and degenerative valvular changes remained predominant etiologies in patients < 65 and ≥ 65 years of age, respectively. [4]

Guangzhou city, a modern city of China, includes 11 administrative regions, which can be roughly divided into urban region and rural region according to the level of economic development. At present in China, there is a lack of large-scale epidemiological survey. With socio-economic development and an increasing aging population, the etiology of VHD in Chinese population may have changed. Therefore, the study was conducted to collect epidemiological data and risk factors of DVHD in elderly population in Guangzhou city.

METHODS

Study Population

We conducted a community-based survey of elderly population with DVHD in southern China (The Guangzhou Valvular Heart Disease Study) from July 2015 to August 2017. A 5-stage, stratified multistage random sampling method was used to recruit subjects. Initially, all the 11 districts (Yuexiu, Haizhu, Liwan, Tianhe, Huangpu, Baiyun, Panyu, Nansha, Huadu, Conghua, and Zengchen districts) in Guangzhou city were divided into urban group and rural group, from which one urban and one rural district were selected by simple random sampling method. This stage leaded to the selection of Yuexiu district (urban region) and Panyu district (rural region). Later, the second stage of sample selection consisted of streets or townships. This stage leaded to the selection of Xinzao town, Nancun town and Xiaoguwei street to conduct the survey in Panyu district while Dadong street and Baiyun street were chosen in Yuexiu district. The third stage of sample selection consisted of residential committees or village committees. This stage leaded to the selection of 7 residential committees in Dadong street and Baiyun street while 17 village committees in Xinzao town, Nancun town and Xiaoguwei street were chosen to conduct the survey. The fourth stage of sample selection consisted of households. This stage leaded to the selection of households from a listing of all households in a selected community. Finally, the fifth stage leaded to the selection of people within the selected households. Every subject who was eligible to fit the inclusive criteria in a household was all included for the study.

Subjects were enrolled if they met all of the following inclusion criteria: (1) residents who had Guangzhou household register and had lived in selected communities for at least 6 months by the day they participated in the survey; (2) ≥ 65 years of age. Subjects were excluded if they had any of the following exclusion criteria: (1) residents who had mental or cognitive disorders, disturbance of understanding, deaf-mutters, mobility difficulties; (2) residents with malignant tumors who need to be treated; and (3) temporary residents who lived in Guangzhou for less than 6 months.

Transthoracic Echocardiography Protocol

All subjects underwent echocardiography, which was performed using a Vivid-i-Cardiovascular-Ultrasound-System (GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway). Cardiac structure and function were visualized along the standard parasternal long-axis, short-axis, suprasternal, subcostal, and apical four-chamber views.[5] Cardiac dimensions were measured by according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography.[6] The position and number of valvular leaflet, valvular thickness, echo, calcification and blood flow of each valve orifice were detailed recorded. All echocardiograms were judged and confirmed by two ultrasound specialists with > 10 years of experience to ensure quality. Poor echocardiograms were excluded.

Degeneration is characterized by increased echogenicity, thickness, and stiffness of the valvular leaflet, with no commissural fusion.[5] Degenerative mitral valve calcification is defined as increased valvular thickness, stiffness, and echogenicity on the fibrous base of the mitral valve. Degenerative aortic valve sclerosis is defined as increased valvular thickness, stiffness, and echogenicity without restriction of leaflet motion. Degenerative aortic valve stenosis was defined as thickened leaflets with increased anterograde jet velocity of aortic valve orifice.[7] Severe valvular heart disease was defined as follows:[8,9] (1) severe aortic valve stenosis with anterograde transvalvular blood flow velocity ≥ 4 m/s or mean; (2) tansvalvular pressure gradient ≥ 40 mmHg; (3) Severe mitral stenosis with a valve orifice area ≤ 1.5 cm2; (4) severe mitral regurgitation with a grade ≥ 3/4; and (5) severe aortic regurgitation with a grade ≥ 3/4.

Questionnaire, Physical, Laboratory and Other Auxiliary Examinations

A structured and interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to survey each participant, including personal information (name, gender, date of birth, residential address, educational level, and occupation [classification intensity of physical work is classified on the basis of the National standard of the people’s Republic of China [GB3869-83], and the Clinical Modification code [GB3869-1997]), living and eating habits (cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary preferences, sleep habits, and physical exercise), medical history (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hyperuricaemia [HUA], chronic kidney disease [CKD], coronary artery disease [CAD], congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease), and physical examination (body mass index [BMI], average systolic and diastolic blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, height, and weight).

Laboratory examination included serum biochemistry determinations and assessment of levels of fasting plasma lipids. Other auxiliary examinations included standard 12-lead electrocardiogram and single lead 24 h-holter electrocardiogram. Definition of suspicious risk factors as follow:[10] hypertension was defined as a blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg or a history of hypertension and the use of antihypertensive medications. Diabetes was defined as a level of fasting blood glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or taking antidiabetic medications. Dyslipidemia was defined as presence of TC level ≥ 6.22 mmol/L (240 mg/dL), TG ≥ 1.70 mmol/L (150 mg/dL), LDL-C ≥ 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL), HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), or taking medications to treat dyslipedemia. HUA was defined as serum uric acid level > 420 μmol/L in male gender and > 360 μmol/L in female gender. CKD was defined as serum creatinine level ≥ 2 mg/dL. BMI was defined as weight divided by height squared (kg/m 2). CAD was deemed to be present based on the following: a history of angina pectoris or; myocardial infarction; positive stress test results; angiographic evidence of CAD; coronary intervention; coronary artery bypass surgery; or the presence of significant Q waves on a surface electrocardiogram. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference > 88 cm for female and 102 cm for male. Overall obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2.

Written Informed Consent and Ethics Approval

The written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Guangzhou Medical Ethics Committee of the Chinese Medical Association (No. GDREC2015306H) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statistical Methods

Statistical analysis of all collected data was performed using SPSS (version 20.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). First of all, the research variables were described and characterized to exhibit the general profile of the sample. Then the results were analyzed by descriptive and related-statistics analysis. Categorical data were presented as number (percentage). Continuous data were presented as mean ± SD. Statistical tests were Pearson’s Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Trends across uric acid level, red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb) count, and platelet (PLT) count were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Initially, univariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess DVHD-associated risk factors. Later, a P value ≤ 0.1 was used for entry into the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the associations. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics

As shown in Table 1, of the 3538 subjects aged 72 ± 5.8 years, 61.9% were female gender, and 48.2% were from urban region. Of these, 36.9% subjects were diagnosed with DVHD by echocardiography; in addition, 3.3% subjects had AF, 50.5% had hypertension, 7.7% had CAD, and 15.1% had diabetes mellitus. Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was the most frequent (n = 528, 14.9%) followed by moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (n = 464, 13.1%), moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (n = 275, 7.8%), and aortic stenosis (n = 31, 0.9%). As shown in Table 2, excluding rheumatic and other causes of valvular disease, further comparison of valvular abnormalities between DVHD and non-DVHD, DVHD had significantly greater prevalence of moderate-severe aortic regurgitation, moderate- severe mitral regurgitation, and aortic stenosis (P < 0.001).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

Variables Value
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, n (%) or median (IQR). CRP: C-reactive protein; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR: interquartile range; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TIA: transient ischemic attacks.
Age, yrs 72 ± 5.8
Female gender 2190 (61.9%)
Urban region 1705(48.2%)
Marital status
 Married 2564 (72.5%)
 Divorced 22 (0.6%)
 Separated 11 (0.3%)
 Widowed 890 (25.2%)
 Single 51 (1.4%)
Education
 Primary school or less 2113 (59.7%)
 Middle school 1062 (30.0%)
 College or more 363 (10.3%)
Occupation
 Light manual laborer 1064 (30.0%)
 Medium manual laborer 1265 (35.8%)
 Heavy manual laborer 1209 (34.2%)
Smoking 822 (23.2%)
Drinking 592 (16.7%)
Measures of adiposity
 Height, cm 156.3 ± 8.5
 Weight, kg 58.6 ± 10.5
 Body mass index, kg/m2 24.0 ± 3.7
 Obesity 188 (5.3%)
 Waist, cm 86.7 ± 9.9
 Abdominal obesity 1799 (50.8%)
Glucose metabolism
 Fasting blood glucose, mmol/L 5.8 ± 1.6
 Diabetes mellitus 534 (15.1%)
Blood pressure
 Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 139.7 ± 20.4
 Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 80.5 ± 11.4
 Hypertension 1788 (50.5%)
Lipids
 Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.7 ± 1.2
 Triglyceride ≥1.70 mmol/L 1193 (33.7%)
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L 5.5 ± 1.1
 Total cholesterol ≥ 6.22 mmol/L 852 (24.1%)
 LDL-C, mmol/L 3.7 ± 1.0
 LDL-C ≥ 4.14 mmol/L 1047 (29.6%)
 HDL-C, mmol/L 1.5 ± 0.4
 HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L 371 (10.5%)
 Dyslipidemia 917 (25.9%)
Inflammation
 hs-CRP, mg/L 1.6 (0.6−3.5%)
 hs-CRP > 3 mg/L 920 (26.0%)
Uric acid
 Uric acid, mmol/L 0.4 ± 0.1
 Hyperuricemia 1635 (46.2%)
Renal insufficiency
 Creatinine, µmol/L 83.9 ± 29.1
 Estimated glomerular filtration rate, mL/min per 1.73 m2 70.4 ± 16.9
 Chronic kidney disease 49 (1.4%)
Valvular heart disease
 Non-valvular heart disease 2151 (60.8%)
 Degenerative valvular heart disease 1307 (36.9%)
 Rheumatic valvular heart disease 11 (0.3%)
 Others 69 (2.0%)
Atrial fibrillation 115 (3.3%)
Coronary artery disease 201 (5.7%)
Stroke 138 (3.9%)
TIA 113 (3.2%)
Heart failure 280 (7.9%)
Echocardiographic variables
 Left ventricular ejection fraction 69.2 (5.2%)
 Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, mm 45.7 ± 4.6
 Left ventricular end-systolic dimension, mm 27.5 ± 3.8
 Left ventricular posterior wall thickness, mm 9.4 ± 1.1
 Ventricular septal thickness, mm 10.1 ± 1.2
 Left atrial dimension, mm 33.9 ± 4.9
 Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation 275 (7.8%)
 Moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation 464 (13.1%)
 Moderate or severe aortic regurgitation 528 (14.9%)
 Aortic stenosis 31 (0.9%)

Table 2. Comparison of valvular abnormalities between DVHD and non-DVHD.

Characteristic Overall Non-DVHD DVHD P-value
Data are presented as n or n (%). DVHD: degenerative valvular heart disease.
Moderate-severe aortic regurgitation 528 214 (9.9%) 297 (22.7%) < 0.001
Moderate-severe mitral regurgitation 275 132 (6.1%) 131 (10.0%) < 0.001
Aortic stenosis 31 0 31 (2.4%) < 0.001

DVHD Prevalence Differed by Demography, Serum Biochemistry, and Medical History

As shown in Table 3, prevalence of DVHD increased with advancing age (P < 0.001), and up to 53.0% among those ≥ 75 years of age. DVHD prevalence were shown to be higher in rural region than urban region ( P < 0.001). Compared to low educational level, subjects with higher educational level had higher DVHD prevalence ( P < 0.001). Additionally, subjects served as heavy manual laborer had the highest DVHD prevalence ( P < 0.001). Relative to never smoking, present smoking was associated with higher prevalence of DVHD ( P < 0.01).

Table 3. Prevalence of DVHD based on the selected variables.

Variables Groups Frequency Prevalence (%) P
CRP: C-reactive protein; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TIA: transient ischemic attacks.
Demographic
 Age, yrs < 0.001
65–74 748 30.1
75–84 480 51.6
≥ 85 79 64.2
 Gender > 0.05
Male 524 39.1
Female 783 36.6
 Region < 0.001
Rural 769 42.0
Urban 538 31.6
 Educational level < 0.001
Primary school or less 877 41.5
Middle school 319 30.0
College or more 111 30.6
 Occupation < 0.001
Light manual laborer 288 32.6
Medium manual laborer 365 33.7
Heavy manual laborer 451 43.9
 Cigarette smoking < 0.01
No 963 35.5
Yes 344 41.8
 Alcohol consumption > 0.05
No 1103 37.4
Yes 204 34.5
 Body mass index, kg/m2 > 0.05
< 18.5 68 36.0
18.5–25 727 36.5
25–30 428 39.3
≥ 30 84 44.7
Serum biochemical
 Red blood cell > 0.05
Normal 1094 37.6
Reduced 121 47.3
Elevated 90 30.9
 Hemoglobin > 0.05
Normal 1239 37.8
Reduced 23 33.8
Elevated 42 39.3
 Platelet > 0.05
Normal 1145 37.2
Reduced 29 29.3
Elevated 131 47.5
 CRP, mg/L < 0.001
Elevated 216 46.0
Not-elevated 1091 36.5
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L > 0.05
Elevated 764 37.9
Not-elevated 543 37.7
 HDL-C, mmol/L > 0.05
Reduced 168 40.5
Not-reduced 1139 37.4
 LDL-C, mmol/L > 0.05
Elevated 409 40.1
Not-elevated 898 36.8
 Triglyceride, mmol/L > 0.05
Elevated 219 37.7
Not-elevated 1088 37.8
 Uric acid, mmol/L < 0.01
Normal 580 34.9
Reduced 5 50.0
Elevated 722 40.4
 Blood glucose, mmol/L > 0.05
Elevated 317 39.4
Not-elevated 990 37.3
Medical history
 Atrial fibrillation < 0.01
No 1247 47.8
Yes 60 52.2
 Hypertension < 0.001
No 519 32.4
Yes 788 42.4
 Diabetes > 0.05
No 1092 37.3
Yes 215 40.7
 Dyslipidemia > 0.05
No 987 38.6
Yes 320 35.6
 Chronic kidney disease > 0.05
No 1288 37.8
Yes 19 38.8
 Stroke < 0.001
No 1235 37.2
Yes 72 53.7
 TIA > 0.05
No 1256 37.5
Yes 51 46.4
 Coronary artery disease < 0.05
No 1213 37.2
Yes 94 47.2
 Heart failure < 0.05
No 1186 37.3
Yes 121 43.5

Among the routine serum biochemical variables we examined, subjects with elevated levels of CRP and uric acid tend to have higher prevalence (P < 0.01). For medical history, there are significant differences for subjects whether have history of hypertension, CAD, stroke, heart failure, and AF ( P < 0.05).

Analysis of DVHD Risk and Prevalence

As shown in Table 4, multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluated the risk factors for DVHD. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (two-fold increased risk for each 10-year increase in age), living region (OR = 1.801; 95% CI: 1.557−2.082), intensity of physical work (OR = 1.672; 95% CI: 1.385−2.018 and OR = 1.718; 95% CI: 1.414−2.087, respectively), cigarette smoking (OR = 1.341; 95% CI: 1.132−1.589), hypertension (OR = 1.414; 95% CI: 1.221−1.638), stroke (OR = 1.738; 95% CI: 1.085−2.513), CAD (OR = 1.651; 95% CI: 1.085−2.513), reduced or elevated level RBC (OR = 1.347; 95% CI: 1.031−1.761 and OR = 1.599; 95% CI: 1.097−2.331, respectively), elevated level platelets (OR = 1.891; 95% CI: 1.118−3.198), elevated level CRP (OR = 1.346; 95% CI: 1.100−1.646), elevated level LDL-C (OR = 1.243; 95% CI: 1.064−1.451), and elevated level uric acid (OR = 1.282; 95% CI: 1.112−1.479), while the risk of subjects with higher educational level significantly reduce (OR = 0.792; 95% CI: 0.644−0.975 and OR = 0.772; 95% CI: 0.563−0.876, respectively).

Table 4. Analysis of risk factors of DVHD in multivariate logistic regression model.

Variables Group Multivariate logistic regression
OR (95% CI) P-value
CRP: C-reactive protein; DVHD: degenerative valvular heart disease; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Age, yrs 65–74 Reference
75–84 2.393 (2.035–2.814) 0.000
≥ 85 4.018 (2.713–5.951) 0.000
Residential region Urban Reference
Rural 1.801 (1.557–2.082) 0.000
Educational level Primary school or less Reference
Middle school 0.792 (0.644-0.975) 0.028
College or more 0.772 (0.563-0.876) 0.000
Occupation Light manual laborer Reference
Medium manual laborer 1.672 (1.385–2.018) 0.000
Heavy manual laborer 1.718 (1.414–2.087) 0.000
Cigarette smoking No Reference
Yes 1.341 (1.132–1.589) 0.001
Red blood cell Normal Reference
Reduced 1.347 (1.031–1.761) 0.029
Elevated 1.599 (1.097–2.331) 0.015
Platelet Normal Reference
Reduced 1.397 (0.890-2.191) 0.146
Elevated 1.891 (1.118–3.198) 0.018
CRP, mg/L Not-elevated Reference
Elevated 1.346 (1.100-1.646) 0.004
LDL-C, mmol/L Not-elevated Reference
Elevated 1.243 (1.064–1.451) 0.006
Uric acid, mmol/L Normal Reference
Reduced 1.807 (0.516–6.323) 0.355
Elevated 1.282 (1.112–1.479) 0.001
Hypertension No Reference
Yes 1.414 (1.221–1.638) 0.000
Stroke No Reference
Yes 1.738 (1.085–2.513) 0.016
Coronary artery disease No Reference
Yes 1.651 (1.085–2.513) 0.008

DISCUSSION

There were three main findings from the present survey. First, the prevalence of DVHD in the elderly population in Guangzhou was 36.9%. Second, the prevalence of DVHD increased with advancing age, especially when the age was ≥ 75 years of age. Third, the prevalence of DVHD differed based on demography, serum biochemistry, and medical history, which were also shown to be independent risk factors for DVHD.

DVHD Prevalence

In developing countries, etiology of VHD was mostly rheumatic. The prevalence of rheumatic VHD ranged from 46%−72% according to previous reports depending on the enrolled cohorts, or survey method. A survey of South African center, the prevalence of rheumatic VHD was reported at 72% of subjects.[11] In another survey in Turkey that included 1300 patients hospitalized in 42 centers in 2009, rheumatic VHD accounted for 46% of subjects.[12] In developed countries, since the 1950s, the predominance of VHD has a significant shifted from a rheumatic towards a degenerative etiology. Due to the superior social and economic status and favorable living environment found in Guangzhou compared to the rest of China, our survey was conducted to collect epidemiological data in Guangzhou. In the present study, we conducted Guangzhou City in which urban region and rural region were involved. All subjects underwent echocardiography for VHD screening. Degenerative was the most common etiology of VHD. Prevalence of DVHD increased with advancing age. Compared to 65−74 years of age, the prevalence of DVHD in age of 75−84 and ≥ 85 increased 2- and 3-fold, respectively. Because a stratified multistage sampling method was used to recruit subjects. DVHD prevalence and characteristic should be considered representative. In subjects ≥ 75 years of age, DVHD was present in 53.0% in our survey, which was slightly lower than the global average,[13] and slightly lower than the previous study in hospital in southern China, as reported by Liu, et al.[1] In agreement with previous reports, DVHD was the most common VHD. Nevertheless, the DVHD prevalence in present study was neither extremely low nor high, which differed from previous findings. Because the cohorts in our study were from community; additionally, we only chosed those subjects ≥ 65 years of age. DVHD causes stenosis or insufficiency of single or multiple heart valves, resulting in limited blood flow or regurgitation.[4] In present study, DVHD had significantly greater prevalence of moderate-severe aortic regurgitation, moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, and aortic stenosis, which was consistent with the results of the Pasca study.[14]

DVHD Prevalence and Relative Risk Factors

Age, smoking, and hypertension were not unexpected predictors, having been noted in previous studies. Chen, et al.[15] described hypertension, age, smoking, and gender were independent predictors of valvular calcification. Opposing results reported by the Helsinki Aging Study[16] showed that smoking was not a risk factor respect to the prevalence of DVHD. In our present study, 1307 subjects were diagnosed with DVHD. Of these, 41.8% subjects had smoking, which was much higher when compared with the prevalence of approximately 30% found in the study by the Helsinki Aging Study.[16]

Aronow, et al.[17] described an association between hypercholesterolemia and aortic valve calcification. Opposing results reported by Hsu, et al.[18] showed that there was no association between hypercholesterolemia and aortic valve calcification. In our present study, the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia registered in current study was 37.9%, which was similar to the results found in the study by Aronow and colleagues,[17] but much lower when compared with the prevalence of 65% found in the study by Hsu and colleagues.[18] This variable did not present statistical significance. The absence of significance in hypercholesterolemia was a surprise, since the presence of cholesterol is an important factor in the process of valvular degeneration. We speculate that the difference can be attributed to the low number of diagnoses established in the cohort.

Studies have shown that platelets are activated in calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) and promote the progression of the disease. The process relies on the activation of P2RY1-GPIIb/IIIa-LysoPA pathway, which drives an osteogenic program in valvular interstitial cells (VICs),[19] which explains an association between platelets and higher prevalence of DVHD in our study. Interestingly, our study also showed an association between red blood cell and higher prevalence of DVHD. This is the first report of a significant increase in the DVHD prevalence among the elderly residing in Guangzhou City. Although the proportion of red blood cell was small (approximately 30%) in the present study, the difference was statistically significant. How red blood cell affected the prevalence of DVHD has not been established.

Uric acid (UA) is the end product of purine metabolism in humans. Although the causal relationship between uric acid and DVHD remains unclear, many epidemiological studies suggest the existence of a significant association between high uric acid levels and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases as well as CKD.[20] In the Framingham Heart Study,[21] 284 subjects (9.3%) were diagnosed with valve/annular calcification; of these, 20% subjects had CKD, which had a 60% increased odds of mitral annular calcification (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.03−2.5). Mehta and colleagues demonstrated that serum uric acid was independently associated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CF PWV) and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (CR PWV) in a Framingham Heart Study.[22] This positive correlation between uric acid and CF PWV and CR PWV suggests that uric acid may play a role in increasing arterial stiffness. In our study, hyperuricemia was defined according to the criteria adopted by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Our data indicated that 40.4% of elderly are hyperuricemia in Guangzhou residents. Logistic regression was used to examine the odds of valvular calcification among subjects with hyperuricemia. After adjustment for age, participants with hyperuricemia had a approximately 30% increased odds of DVHD (OR = 1.282; 95% CI: 1.112−1.479). Further studies are needed to evaluate whether serum uric acid is an independent predictor of increased vascular stiffness in prospective analysis and to define populations in which lowering serum uric acid levels may reduce the cardiovascular burden.

DVHD was prevalent among the elderly. As we known, DVHD might be mainly relevant considering the socioeconomic development and improvements in quality of life, as well as an increasing aging population. Interestingly, we found a two-fold increased prevalence of DVHD in elderly who lived at rural region compared to elderly who lived at urban region. This finding could be due to the following reasons: (1) the gap between urban and rural region in Southern China has gradually narrowed; and the prevalence of DVHD is increasing progressively. (2) Echocardiography is one of the most effective methods for assessment of valvular structure and function. In the past, compared with urban areas, residents in rural areas were not screened; in present study, echocardiography screening was routinely performed, so more and more valvular diseases were detected, especially in rural areas. (3) The subjects who lived in rural region often with more risk factors, such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus.

In addition, stroke appears to be a most common risk factor of DVHD in Guangzhou elderly. The prevalence of stroke with DVHD in our study was 53.7%, which is much higher than the rate found by Marmelo, et al.[10] in which the prevalence of stroke in individuals with aortic valve sclerosis was 8%. Although the difference in rate of stroke from both studies, stroke appears to be a common risk factor of degenerative VHD in both studies. We speculate that the influence of stroke in the development of DVHD may be explained by the fact that some same risk factors exist both in DVHD and stroke. However, further investigations are needed to clarify the relationship between stroke and DVHD development.

Study Limitations

The study had some limitations. First, this study are that it is a cross-sectional analysis and includes only subjects ≥ 65 years of age, which may bias the results against an even stronger relation between these risk factors and DVHD. Second, the number of cases of some risk factors for DVHD in present study is too small, resulting in weakening the effectiveness of logistic regression analysis prediction; therefore, long-term follow-up is necessary to determine the risk factors regarding the prevalence of DVHD.

Conclusion

Degenerative is the most common etiology of VHD in elderly population in southern China. The prevalence of DVHD differed by living region, educational level, and occupation. Emerging evidence indicates RBC, PLT, uric acid and stroke are likely contributors. More attention should be paid to DVHD in order to detect the disease earlier and improve the quality life of patients.

FUNDING

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81370295), Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (No. 201508020261), Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2017A020215054) and Science and Technology Planning of Guangzhou City, China (No. 2014B070705005).

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

None

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Hai Deng and Shulin Wu conceived the study. Shangfei He and Junrong Jiang collected data, drafted the manuscript, and completed the survey. Fangzhou Liu, Yumei Xue, and Hongtao Liao analysed data and interpreted results. Murui Zheng and Huoxing Li collected data and completed the survey.

Contributor Information

Hai DENG, Email: doctordh2020@163.com.

Shu-Lin WU, Email: wushulincn@126.com.

References

  • 1.Liu F, Xue Y, Liao H, et al Five-year epidemiological survey of valvular heart disease: changes in morbidity, etiological spectrum and management in a cardiovascular center of Southern China. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:1724–1730. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.11.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00201-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marijon E, Ou P, Celermajer DS, et al Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease detected by echocardiographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:470–476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hu P, Liu XB, Liang J, et al A hospital-based survey of patients with severe valvular heart disease in China. Int J Cardiol. 2017;231:244–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:630–634. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00563-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:233–270. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wasilewski J, Mirota K, Wilczek K, et al Calcific aortic valve damage as a risk factor for cardiovascular events. Pol J Radiol. 2012;77:30–34. doi: 10.12659/PJR.883626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–e185. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:2440–2492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marmelo FC, Mateus SM, Pereira AJ Association of aortic valve sclerosis with previous coronary artery disease and risk factors. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103:398–402. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sliwa K, Carrington M, Mayosi BM, et al Incidence and characteristics of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease in urban African adults: insights from the heart of Soweto study. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:719–727. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Demirbağ R, Sade LE, Aydın M, et al The Turkish registry of heart valve disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2013;41:1–10. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2013.71430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Iung B, Vahanian A Epidemiology of acquired valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:962–970. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pasca I, Dang P, Tyagi G, Pai RG Survival in patients with degenerative mitral stenosis: results from a large retrospective cohort study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29:461–469. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen HY, Engert JC, Thanassoulis G Risk factors for valvular calcification. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019;26:96–102. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lindroos M, Kupari M, Valvanne J, et al Factors associated with calcific aortic valve degeneration in the elderly. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:865–870. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aronow WS, Schwartz KS, Koenigsberg M Correlation of serum lipids, calcium, and phosphorus, diabetes mellitus and history of systemic hypertension with presence or absence of calcified or thickened aortic cusps or root in elderly patients. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:998–999. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91144-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hsu SY, Hsieh IC, Chang SH, et al Aortic valve sclerosis is an echocardiographic indicator of significant coronary disease in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59:72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-504X.2005.00342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bouchareb R, Boulanger MC, Tastet L, et al Activated platelets promote an osteogenic programme and the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1362–1373. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Uchida S, Kumagai T, Chang WX, et al Time to target uric acid to retard chronic kidney disease progression. Contrib Nephrol. 2018;192:56–68. doi: 10.1159/000484279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fox CS, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al Cross-sectional association of kidney function with valvular and annular calcification: the Framingham heart study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:521–527. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mehta T, Nuccio E, McFann K, et al Association of uric acid with vascular stiffness in the framingham heart study. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:877–883. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Geriatric Cardiology : JGC are provided here courtesy of Institute of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital

RESOURCES