Table 7.
the impact of energy, financial, environmental, and social development
| Energy and environment | Financial and social development | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classes | The specific impact of energy and environmental | The specific impact of energy and environmental | The general effect of financial and social development | The general effect of financial and social development | ||||||||
| Demand-pull | Demand push | Balanced | Demand-pull | Demand push | Balanced | |||||||
| Dependent variables | ln(E. C.F, t) | E. C.f, t | ln(E. C.f, t) | ln(ECOf, t) | ECOf, t | ln(ECOf, t) | ||||||
| Methods | i. | ii. | iii. | iv | v | vi | vii | viii | ix | x | xi | xii |
| Mix of policies | -0.0865*** | -0.0832*** | -1.399*** | -0.0542 | -0.0874*** | -0.410*** | 0.131*** | 0.126*** | 0.392*** | 0.199*** | 0.101*** | 0.121 |
| (0.0321) | (0.0256) | (0.312) | (0.0626) | (0.0317) | (0.112) | (0.0326) | (0.0188) | (0.0823) | (0.0519) | (0.0352) | (0.129) | |
| Constant | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yeses | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| φ1 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| φ2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| φ3 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| φ4 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||||
| Supporting Volunteer CSR | Yes | Yeses | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||
| R2 | 0.019 | 0.023 | 0.015 | 0.023 | 0.014 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.032 | 0.042 | 0.031 | ||
| Observations (N) | 59,039 | 59,042 | 60,065 | 60,748 | 62,400 | 48496 | 58,521 | 65,521 | 64,521 | 54,188 | 59,212 | 50,769 |
a*, **, and *** Specify statistical importance at the 10 %, 5%, and1% Significance a respectively
bThe inflation factor is modified according to all the dependent variables based on 1998
cModels (3) and (9) are calculated using generalized linear models (GLM) with gamma distribution and log relation functionality.