Table 1.
Characteristics and Appraisal of Included Articles (n = 11)
Author | Place of Study | Variable Investigated | Quality Level | Summary of Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jetelina KK19 | USA | Intimate Partner Violence | High | 18% prevalence of violence and 1.63-fold increase |
Gebrewahd GT20 | Ethiopia | Intimate Partner Violence | Medium | 26.6% prevalence of violence against women |
Sediri S21 | Tunisia | Intimate Partner Violence | Medium | 14.4% prevalence of pandemic holidays and 19.34-fold increase in violence against women who were exposed to violence before the pandemic |
Gosangi B22 | USA | Intimate Partner Violence | High | 1.8-times more violence than before the pandemic |
Agüero JM23 | Pro | Intimate Partner Violence | Medium | 48% increase in calls during the pandemic compared to before |
Panzeri M13 | Italy | Sexual Function | High | Decreased sexual desire, decreased sexual intercourse, decreased sexual satisfaction, decreased orgasm |
Hensel DJ24 | USA | Sexual Function | Medium | 22.7% decrease in hugging, kissing, and touching; 19.4% decrease in romantic sex; 8.9% decrease in sending sexually explicit messages or images by intimate partner |
Schiavi MC2 | Italy | Sexual Function | High | Decreased score of sexual function components during pandemic compared to before |
Fuchs A25 | Poland | Sexual Function | High | Decreased score of sexual function components during pandemic compared to before |
Yuksel B14 | Turkey | Sexual Function | Medium | Decreased score of sexual function components during pandemic compared to before |
Luetke M26 | USA | Sexual Function | Medium | 34% difference between sexual partners in the components of romantic relationships |