Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 27;13:679933. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.679933

Table 4.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify the less complex models.

Model CLIN Model CLIN-F Model CLIN-COG Model CLIN-COG-F
Basic information N (N with delirium) 771 (181); 23.48% 771 (181); 23.48 771 (181); 23.48 771 (181); 23.48%
Nagelkerke's pseudo-R2 0.242 0.256 0.304 0.313
F 30.41 29.09 30.14 28.78
p <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* <.001*
AUC [95%-CI] 0.760 [0.721–0.800] 0.769 [0.731–0.808] 0.798 [0.762–0.835] 0.801 [0.765–0.838]
Variable Categories N ( N with delirium); Percentage OR [95%-CI] p OR [95%-CI] P OR [95%-CI] p OR [95%-CI] P
Clinical ASA Score I + II 215 (17); 7.91%
Score III 477 (116); 24.32% 2.25 [1.24–4.24] 0.009* 2.09 [1.15–3.96] 0.019* 2.22 [1.20–4.28] 0.013* 2.08 [1.12–4.02] 0.024*
Score IV 79 (48); 60.76% 7.75 [3.55–17.42] <0.001* 7.02 [3.19–15.90] <0.001* 6.98 [3.12–16.09] <0.001* 6.44 [2.86–14.93] <0.001*
Multimorbidity ≤4 diseases 210 (26); 12.38%
5–8 diseases 489 (126); 25.77% 1.85 [1.13–3.09] 0.016* 1.83 [1.13–3.06] 0.017* 1.79 [1.08–3.04] 0.027* 1.77 [1.07–3.01] 0.029*
≥9 diseases 72 (29); 40.28% 3.61 [1.81–7.26] <0.001* 3.27 [1.62–6.64] <0.001* 3.36 [1.63–6.94] 0.001* 3.07 [1.48–6.40] 0.003*
Cut-to-suture time <90 min 260 (41); 15.77%
90–180 min 256 (38); 14.84% 0.67 [0.38–1.15] 0.145 0.62 [0.35–1.07] 0.088(*) 0.63 [0.35–1.11] 0.114 0.59 [0.33–1.05] 0.077(*)
>180 min 255 (102); 40.00% 1.69 [0.93–3.03] 0.082(*) 1.62 [0.89–2.93] 0.112 1.69 [0.92–3.10] 0.093(*) 1.63 [0.88–3.01] 0.120
Renal failure >45 mmol/ml 672 (148); 22.02%
<45 mmol/ml 99 (33); 33.33% 1.58 [0.94–2.61] 0.080(*) 1.46 [0.86–2.44] 0.155 1.49 [0.87–2.53] 0.139 1.40 [0.81–2.38] 0.227
Polypharmacy ≤5 drugs 339 (60); 17.70%
6–10 drugs 338 (88); 26.04% 1.18 [0.77–1.81] 0.447 1.08 [0.70–1.66] 0.743 1.03 [0.66–1.61] 0.886 0.96 [0.61–1.51] 0.866
> 10 drugs 94 (33); 35.11% 1.66 [0.90–3.05] 0.101 1.34 [0.71–2.51] 0.358 1.37 [0.72–2.60] 0.332 1.16 [0.59–2.22] 0.666
Cardio-pulmonary Bypass No 544 (90); 16.54%
Yes 227 (91); 40.09% 1.45 [0.77–2.80] 0.252 1.59 [0.84–3.10] 0.159 1.54 [0.81–3.00] 0.191 1.66 [0.87–3.26] 0.129
Surgery type Ortho./Visc. 464 (70); 15.09%
Cardio-vasc. 307 (111); 36.16% 1.09 [0.56–2.07] 0.804 1.26 [0.64–2.43] 0.503 1.32 [0.67–2.54] 0.420 1.49 [0.74–2.91] 0.253
Cognition MoCA ≥23 points 517 (100); 19.34%
<23 points 254 (81); 31.89% 1.95 [1.28–2.98] 0.002* 1.82 [1.19–2.80] 0.006*
Digit span ≥5 points 460 (86); 18.70%
<5 points 311 (95); 30.55% 1.50 [1.01–2.25] 0.047* 1.49 [0.99–2.24] 0.053(*)
Pre-existing dementia No 761 (172); 22.60%
Yes 10 (9); 90.00% 26.17 [4.49–498.64] 0.003* 28.35 [4.82–541.97] 0.002*
Frailty Clinical frailty score Score 1–3 441 (89); 20.18%
Score 4–8 330 (92); 27.89% 1.88 [1.23–2.90] 0.004* 1.74 [1.12–2.72] 0.015*

Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis comparing four possible models with higher economical practicability. All the data were grouped into the categories stated. To ensure the possibility of statistical comparison of all models, only the patients were included, for whom data in all the models were available. Statistically significant tests results are highlighted in bold type, significant p-values are marked with *, and p-values at a significance level of .05 to 0.1 are marked with (*).