Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2020 May 15;30(10):5560–5577. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06909-3

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting nodal metastases.

Sensitivity Specificity

Anatomic Location Analysis level Modality No. of studies Publication Years Summary estimate 95% CI* I2 (%) Summary estimate 95% CI* I2 (%) Cochran’s Q P-value

All Any US 1 2015 N/A 0.43 N/A 0.96
CT 8 2000–2019 0.51 0.36–0.67 81.5 0.87 0.81–0.92 74.8 15.264 <0.001
MRI 37# 2000–2019 0.57 0.49–0.64 85.5 0.93 0.89–0.95 96.5 590.416 <0.001
PET 42 2001–2019 0.57 0.48–0.65 80.3 0.95 0.93–0.97 91.0 198.715 <0.001

Pelvic Patient US 1 2015 N/A 0.43 N/A 0.96
CT 3 2002–2019 N/A 0.15–0.79 N/A 0.63–0.97
MRI 19 2001–2019 0.61 0.51–0.70 72.6 0.88 0.82–0.92 91.0 115.860 <0.001
PET 18 2001–2019 0.60 0.48–0.70 73.8 0.93 0.87–0.96 82.9 70.132 <0.001

Pelvic Site CT (per side) 2 2000, 2017 N/A 0.51–0.65 N/A 0.86–0.97
MRI 12 2000–2019 0.59 0.43–0.74 90.4 0.94 0.88–0.97 97.3 253.112 <0.001
 per side 3 2000–2017 N/A 0.24–0.71 N/A 0.80–0.96
 per region 3 2010–2012 N/A 0.25–0.83 N/A 0.93–0.98
 per node 6 2007–2019 0.66 0.44–0.82 93.8 0.92 0.80–0.97 98.4 213.770 <0.001
PET 7 2005–2018 0.44 0.35–0.54 56.1 0.98 0.93–0.99 92.1 18.478 <0.001
 per side 4 2005–2018 0.38 0.24–0.54 53.6 0.95 0.88–0.98 70.5 5.818 0.027
 per region 2 2009, 2010 N/A 0.36–0.46 N/A 0.94–0.99
 Per node 1 2006 N/A 0.72 N/A 1.00

Paraaortic Patient CT 4 2002–2019 0.29 0.06–0.71 64.8 0.91 0.83–0.96 49.1 2.403 0.150
MRI 4 2002–2018 0.40 0.17–0.68 60.1 0.91 0.79–0.97 76.9 8.431 0.007
PET 15 2001–2019 0.59 0.37–0.77 78.8 0.96 0.92–0.98 83.5 26.834 <0.001

Paraaortic Site MRI (per region) 1 2010 N/A 0.25 N/A 0.94
PET 2 2005, 2010 N/A 0.40–0.67 N/A 0.99–1.00
 per side 1 2005 N/A 0.40 N/A 0.99
 per region 1 2010 N/A 0.67 N/A 1.00

Pelvic or paraaortic Patient CT 3 2005–2017 N/A 0.31–0.76 N/A 0.62–0.88
MRI 10 2001–2018 0.55 0.41–0.69 79.5 0.90 0.81–0.95 88.7 48.196 <0.001
PET 15 2007–2017 0.69 0.53–0.81 81.3 0.90 0.84–0.94 83.1 49.770 <0.001

Pelvic or paraaortic Site MRI 8 2001–2014 0.39 0.29–0.50 92.6 0.96 0.94–0.98 99.1 213.842 <0.001
 per region 6 2001–2012 0.37 0.26–0.49 91.4 0.97 0.94–0.98 91.5 100.231 <0.001
 per node 2 2006, 2014 N/A 0.37–0.58 N/A 0.88–0.99
PET 7 2001–2015 0.53 0.33–0.73 91.6 0.98 0.96–0.99 92.0 45.766 <0.001
 per region 6 2001–2015 0.44 0.30–0.58 77.5 0.98 0.96–0.99 93.0 30.214 <0.001
 per node 1 2014 N/A 0.91 N/A 0.98

CI = confidence interval; N/A = none available

*

ranges for endpoints with ≤3 included studies

#

1 of 38 studies (Kang S et al, 2013) assessing nodal metastasis using MRI was excluded due to instability of hierarchical modeling