Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;21:786. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06719-3

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of interviewed participants in the Cardiac Care Bridge program

Patient Age Sex Residency status Educational level MMSEa DSMSb Hospitali-zation ≤ 6 months Primary diagnosis Charlson comorbidity indexc
1 87 Female With partner Primary 21 1 No Valve deficit 2
2 86 Female Alone Primary 29 1 No Acute coronary syndrome 2
3 81 Male With partner Primary 27 1 No Heart failure 4
4 85 Female Alone Secondary 24 2 No Acute coronary syndrome 0
5 76 Male With partner Higher 27 3 Yes Rhytm or conduction disorder 4
6 87 Male Alone Secondary 29 1 No Heart failure 4
7 84 Female Alone Higher 28 3 No Heart failure 2
8 82 Male With partner Higher 28 1 No Rhytm or conduction disorder 6
9 89 Male With child Higher 27 1 No Heart failure 4
10 82 Female With partner Primary 29 2 Yes Heart failure 1
11 79 Male With partner Higher 29 2 No Rhytm or conduction disorder 1
12 87 Female Alone Primary 29 1 Yes Valve deficit 3
13 73 Male Alone Primary 24 1 Yes Heart failure 5
14 86 Male Alone Secondary 27 4 No Heart failure 2
15 84 Female Alone Primary 24 1 No Heart failure 4
16 71 Female With partner Primary 24 3 Yes Heart failure 5

a Mini-Mental State Examination [21]: the score ranges between 0 and 30 points. In the CCB program, only patients with a MMSE ≥15 were included. A MMSE-score < 24 indicates cognitive impairment. b Dutch Safety Management System [22]: the score between 0 and 4 points, based on four domains of frailty (malnutrition, risk of impairments in daily functioning, risk on delirium and fall risk). A higher score on the DSMS indicates a higher risk of functional loss. c Charlson comorbidity index [23]: a weighted index to classify comorbid conditions based on their 1-year mortality prognosis