Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 11;112(8):3018–3028. doi: 10.1111/cas.14971

TABLE 2.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 131)

Factor DFS OS
Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Age, years 0.991 0.962‐1.022 .6000 0.995 0.959‐1.032 .790
Sex Male 0.667 0.347‐1.278 .2400 1.027 0.458‐2.302 .940
Tumor location Ce and Ut 1.508 0.908‐2.507 .1100 1.171 0.640‐2.143 .610
Histopathology Poorly differentiated 1.487 0.734‐3.012 .2900 1.754 0.816‐3.772 .170
pStage II‐III 2.587 1.378‐4.856 .0012 2.811 1.475‐5.357 <.001 1.909 0.948‐3.844 .055 2.039 0.994‐4.183 .0400
Effect of preoperative treatment Grade 2‐3 0.360 0.164‐0.790 .0038 0.281 0.127‐0.622 <.001 0.334 0.131‐0.847 .008 0.265 0.102‐0.683 .0013
SIRPα expression High 1.775 1.017‐3.096 .0350 1.600 0.907‐2.821 .090 2.056 1.045‐4.042 .027 1.988 0.998‐3.959 .0400
PD‐L1 expression Positive 1.425 0.867‐2.343 .1500 1.151 0.649‐2.043 .620
SIRPα/PD‐L1 Coexpression 1.624 0.992‐2.658 .0550 1.627 0.916‐2.887 .090

Abbreviations: Ce, cervical esophagus; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PD‐L1, programmed cell death‐ligand 1; pStage, pathological stage; SIRPα, signal regulatory protein alpha; Ut, upper thoracic esophagus; –, not included in analysis.