Table 2.
Total n = 1758 |
Tertiles of total red and processed red meat (TRPRM) (g/d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (0–39) n = 582 |
2 (40–85) n = 593 |
3 (86–344) n = 583 |
P | ||
Total red and processed red meat, g/d | 71.5 ± 71.4 | 15.6 ± 17.7 | 61.6 ± 17.7 | 132.9 ± 57.7 | 0.0001 |
Red meat, g/d | 36.8 ± 48.8 | 7.9 ± 14.3 | 32.1 ± 27.4 | 68.0 ± 56.8 | 0.0001 |
Processed red meat, g/d | 34.8 ± 48.9 | 7.7 ± 13.0 | 29.6 ± 26.3 | 64.9 ± 60.2 | 0.0001 |
Total red and processed meat < or = 70 g/d, % | 57 | 100 | 74 | 0 | |
Age, y | 40.8 ± 12.1 | 40.7 ± 12.2 | 41.1 ± 12.4 | 40.6 ± 11.7 | 0.789 |
Men, % | 46 | 32 | 39 | 65 | 0.0001 |
Qualifications, % | 0.0001 | ||||
Degree or equivalent | 27 | 34 | 24 | 22 | |
Higher education, below degree level | 12 | 12 | 14 | 10 | |
GCE, A level or equivalent | 18 | 13 | 20 | 20 | |
GCSE grades A–C or equivalent | 19 | 17 | 19 | 22 | |
GCSE grades D–G/Commercial qualifications/apprenticeship/foreign/other qualifications | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | |
No qualifications/no response/still in education | 19 | 18 | 19 | 19 | |
Equalized annual household income, £b | 28,880 ± 25,214 | 28,880 ± 27,489 | 28,671 ± 24,170 | 29, 070 ± 23, 898 | 0.964 |
Socio-economic classification, %c | 0.016 | ||||
Higher managerial and professional occupations | 16 | 20 | 16 | 14 | |
Lower managerial and professional occupations | 25 | 24 | 28 | 24 | |
Intermediate occupations | 10 | 9 | 11 | 9 | |
Small employers and own account workers | 11 | 11 | 9 | 13 | |
Lower supervisory and technical occupations | 9 | 7 | 8 | 12 | |
Semi-routine occupations | 13 | 13 | 12 | 13 | |
Routine occupations | 11 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
Never worked/other | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | |
Ethnic group, % | 0.0001 | ||||
White | 92 | 88 | 93 | 94 | |
Any other group | 9 | 13 | 7 | 6 | |
Number of daily cigarettes, % | 0.0001 | ||||
Non-smoker | 54 | 61 | 57 | 46 | |
Ex-smoker | 18 | 17 | 17 | 19 | |
Current smoker | 28 | 22 | 26 | 35 | |
Has longstanding illness, % yes | 20 | 21 | 19 | 19 | 0.779 |
aValues are means ± SD or percentages unless otherwise stated. NS, not significant. Differences between total red and processed red meat tertiles (TRPRM) for continuous variables were assessed using ANOVA and for categorical variables Chi-square test for independence was used
bThe calculation of the equivalised income involves calculating a McClement score for each household (dependent on number, age and relationships of adults and children in the household), and then dividing the total household income by this score to get an equivalised household income
cBased on national statistics socioeconomic classification [40]