Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 10;11:16198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91759-2

Table 4.

Relationship between EDE complement proteins and clinical factors.

Molecules Systolic blood pressure White matter hyperintensity Processing speed
R2 adjusted Prob > F AICc BIC Beta p-value R2 adjusted Prob > F AICc BIC Beta p-value R2 adjusted Prob > F AICc BIC Beta p-value
C1q 0.53 0.0006 38 39 0.46 0.05 0.45 0.0008 155 157 0.40 0.05 0.21 0.05 23 25 0.59 0.05
C4b 0.06 0.60 43 44 0.08 0.80 0.33 0.006 159 162 0.08 0.70 0.04 0.60 29 31 0.08 0.70
C3b 0.32 0.01 46 48 0.31 0.20 0.62  < 0.0001 146 149 0.65 0.001 0.03 0.30 28 29 0.33 0.20
C5b-9 0.33 0.01 33 34 0.20 0.40 0.56  < 0.0001 149 152 0.64 0.005 0.04 0.60 29 31 0.13 0.70
Bb 0.52 0.0008 53 54 0.58 0.02 0.47 0.0005 153 156 0.40 0.03 0.37 0.006 18 20 0.71 0.005
Factor B 0.08 0.20 48 50 0.41 0.10 0.57 0.001 149 151 0.52 0.004 0.02 0.50 29 30 0.17 0.50
Factor D 0.01 0.90 28 30 0.02 0.90 0.37 0.003 158 160 0.22 0.20 0.05 0.60 29 31 0.05 0.80
CD59 0.43 0.003 58 59 − 0.62 0.02 0.36 0.003 158 161 − 0.21 0.20 0.14 0.10 25 27 − 0.48 0.06
Factor I 0.10 0.16 40 41 − 0.60 0.07 0.33 0.006 159 162 − 0.09 0.60 0.15 0.09 25 26 − 0.44 0.10
CR1 0.06 0.60 35 36 − 0.17 0.60 0.32 0.007 160 162 0.05 0.80 0.03 0.30 28 29 − 0.28 0.20
DAF 0.07 0.20 15 17 − 0.49 0.09 0.37 0.003 158 161 − 0.21 0.20 0.08 0.20 26 28 − 0.35 0.10
CD46 0.004 1.0 36 37 − 0.05 0.90 0.32 0.007 160 162 0.01 1.0 0.001 0.40 28 30 − 0.22 0.30
MBL 0.06 0.20 50 51 − 0.44 0.10 0.32 0.007 160 162 0.006 1.0 0.02 0.30 28 29 − 0.27 0.20

Illustrated in this table are results of standard least square models with: (1) systolic blood pressure as independent variable and complement factors as dependent; (2) complement factors as independent and global volume of white matter hyperintensity as dependent; (3) complement factors as independent and cognitive processing speed (based on time taken to complete the modified Trails test) as dependent. Age was adjusted for in all models. All p-values are FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons.