Table 2.
Impact of Fagerstöm Test related to the lockdown and correlation to FTCQ-12.
| FTCQ-12 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | Mean | SD | p-value | |
| Fagerström test before the lockdown | 0.094 | ||||
| Not addicted to nicotine | 63 | 48.8 | 39.27 | 12.57 | |
| Weakly dependent to nicotine | 37 | 28.7 | 42.35 | 13.34 | |
| Moderately dependent to nicotine | 24 | 18.6 | 42.76 | 12.61 | |
| Strongly dependent on nicotine | 5 | 3.9 | 53.60 | 14.72 | |
| Fagerström test since the lockdown | <0.001 | ||||
| Not addicted to nicotine | 54 | 41.9 | 36.88 | 10.32 | |
| Weakly dependent to nicotine | 29 | 22.5 | 38.30 | 11.70 | |
| Moderately dependent to nicotine | 32 | 24.8 | 46.68 | 13.02 | |
| Strongly or very heavily dependent on nicotine | 14 | 10.9 | 56.85 | 10.81 | |
| <0.001 | |||||
| Increased Fagerström score | 30 | 24.4 | 50.33 | 12.23 | |
| No change in Fagerström score | 88 | 71.5 | 39.08 | 11.78 | |
| Lower Fagerström score | 5 | 4.1 | 36.25 | 11.59 | |