Table 6.
Enzyme typeb | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single | Multi | Phytased | Pig BWe | P valuef | |||||||||||
Item, % | Xyl | Man | Pro | Car | Cock | SEc | – | + | SE | Nursery | G-F | SE | ENZ | PHY | BW |
Corn–SBM-based diets | |||||||||||||||
Studies | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 13 | ||||||
Observations | 6 | 13 | 6 | 20 | 9 | 45 | 9 | 22 | 32 | ||||||
ADG | 2.48abc | 1.50bc | 7.29**a | 0.97c | 2.64*ab | 1.53 | 3.31** | 2.64 | 1.12 | 3.00** | 2.96** | 1.02 | 0.05 | 0.68 | 0.98 |
ADFI | –0.53 | –0.50 | 0.51 | –0.93 | 1.53 | 1.14 | –0.44 | 0.47 | 0.84 | –0.48 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.12 | 0.46 | 0.34 |
G:F | 3.10 | 1.83 | 6.84** | 2.17 | 1.65 | 1.64 | 3.55** | 2.64 | 1.30 | 3.67** | 2.52* | 1.20 | 0.10 | 0.66 | 0.47 |
cDDGS-based diets | |||||||||||||||
Studies | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | ||||||
Observations | 7 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 21 | 9 | 21 | 9 | ||||||
ADG | 1.64 | 3.32** | 2.33 | 2.54 | 3.20** | 1.26 | 2.26** | 2.95** | 0.84 | 2.51 | 2.70** | 1.01 | 0.70 | 0.36 | 0.91 |
ADFI | –0.48 | –0.42 | 1.77 | 1.25 | 0.45 | 1.27 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 0.36 | 1.01 | 0.60 | 0.99 | 0.84 |
G:F | 3.01** | 2.82** | 1.35 | 0.97 | 2.82** | 1.17 | 2.12** | 2.26** | 0.76 | 2.62* | 1.77* | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.44 |
a– cLeast square means with a different superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).
**Mean values differ from 0 (P < 0.01).
*Mean values differ from 0 (P < 0.05).
aImprovement = (enzyme – control)/control × 100%.
bDifferent combination of enzymes: single (Xyl = xylanase, Man = mannanase, or Pro = protease), and multi (Car = mixture of carbohydrases; Cock = cocktail mixture of protease plus single or multiple carbohydrases).
cStandard error.
dSupplementing carbohydrases/protease in the presence (+) or absence (–) of phytase in the diet.
ePig BW = nursery (nursery pigs, <25 kg BW) and G–F (growing–finishing pigs, >25 kg BW).
fProbability value of enzyme (ENZ), phytase (PHY), and pig BW (BW).